In a population of subjects who died from lung cancer following exposure to asbestos, it was found that the mean number of years elapsing between exposure and death was 25. The standard deviation was 7 years. Consider the sampling distribution of sample means based on samples of size 35 drawn from this population.

Required:
What will be the standard deviation of the sampling distribution?

Answer:

-1

Step-by-step explanation:

When you make the number line, go to the middle then move left once. Then mark that  " -1 " and you put the dot over that.

It's hard to explain how to write number lines.

Anyways, the problem equals -1 because 6-7 is negative 1. The + is there to confuse you.

Mark brainliest if possible please :)

Step-by-step explanation:

−2x+5y=−15 and 5x+2y=−6

Rewrite equations:

−2x+5y=−15;5x+2y=−6

Step: Solve−2x+5y=−15for x:

−2x+5y=−15

−2x+5y+−5y=−15+−5y(Add -5y to both sides)

−2x=−5y−15

−2x−2=−5y−15−2(Divide both sides by -2)

x=52y+152

Step: Substitute52y+152forxin5x+2y=−6:

5x+2y=−6

5(52y+152)+2y=−6

292y+752=−6(Simplify both sides of the equation)

292y+752+−752=−6+−752(Add (-75)/2 to both sides)

292y=−872

292y292=−872292(Divide both sides by 29/2)

y=−3

Step: Substitute−3foryinx=52y+152:

x=52y+152

x=52(−3)+152

x=0(Simplify both sides of the equation)

Answer:

x=0 and y=−3

Answer:

the anwer is 5*6

Answer:when he was doing the multipleis of 8 he put 20 when there is no 20

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

x=-7

Step-by-step explanation:

4(1-x)+2x=-3(x+1)

4-4x+2x=-3x-3

4-2x=-3x-3

-2x=-3x-7

x=-7

Answer: −2x+y=−11

(4,-3) = −2x+y=−11.

Answer: −2x+y=−11.

Answer:

a) -16

b)7

c) -4

d) 9

Step-by-step explanation:

by solving

Answer:

6 1/6

Step-by-step explanation:

six goes into 42 seven times that leaves you with one number so it can go in six times evenly and that leaves you with 1/6

Answer:

904

Step-by-step explanation:

8 x 113 = 904

Answer:

1

General Formulas and Concepts:

Order of Operations: BPEMDAS

Step-by-step explanation:

Step 1: Define

a - b + c

a = 4

b = 2

c = -1

Step 2: Solve

Answer:

which one equals 12? option C

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

-12/3

Step-by-step explanation:

Whole numbers can't be negative!

Answer:

d. your welcome

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

940,000

Step-by-step explanation:

Since there is a 6 in 936,292, that gives you the right to make the ten thousandth higher if that makes sense

Step-by-step explanation:

Perimeter of a rectangle = 2(L+W)

L is the length of the rectangle:

W is the width of the rectangle.

Given

Perimeter = 214feet

If the length is 41 ft longer than the width, then L = 41+W

Substitute L = 41+W into the formula:

P = 2(L+W)

214 = 2(41+W+W)

214 = 2(41+2W)

214 = 82+4W

4W = 214-82

4W = 132

W = 132/4

W = 33 feet

Since L = 41+W

L = 41+33

L = 74 feet

Hence the dimension of the field is 74ft by 33ft

The width of the playing field is 33feet

Answer:

c = 4

Step-by-step explanation:

Solve for"c" in the following equation:

- 8 c + 7 = - 25

Subtract 7 from both sides:

- 8 c = - 25 - 7

combine like terms

- 8 c = -32

divide both sides by "-8" to isolate c on the left

c = - 32 / (-8)

c = 4

Answer:

y-int = -10, x-int = 15/2

Step-by-step explanation:

y int:

-4(0)+3y=-30

3y=-30

y=-10

x int:

-4x+3(0)=-30

-4x=-30

x=30/4=15/2

Answer:

3⁷

Step-by-step explanation:

When you multiplying or dividing numbers with exponents, you keep the base the same and specifically with dividing, you subtract the exponents themselves. So, you would be doing 3-(-4), which is 7.

[tex]\mathfrak{\huge{\pink{\underline{\underline{AnSwEr:-}}}}}[/tex]

Actually Welcome to the Concept of the Exponents and power,

Since we know the concept that, any power in denominator of a fraction is shows as negative power when it comes to the Numerator of the fraction,like eg:-

[tex]1 \div ( {5}^{8} ) = {5}^{ - 8} [/tex]

so we apply here same,

also

[tex]1 \div ({5}^{ - 8} ) = {5}^{8} [/tex]

so we get as,

[tex] {3}^{3} \div {3}^{ - 4} = {3}^{3} \times {3}^{4} [/tex]

this is the answer.

Step-by-step explanation:

The measure of CED is p degree.

In triangle ABC and EDC,(Given)(Vertical opposite angles)

By AA rule of similarity,

Corresponding angles of similar triangles are same.

Therefore the measure of CED is p degree.

pls give brainest

Answer:

the first one

Step-by-step explanation: it is your answer because when you solve it i gt that answer i calculated it in a calculator and then showed to the teahcre and said that it was crrect please mark me as brainlist

Answer: 0.038

Step-by-step explanation:

Given: Total games : n= 375

Number of games won by  the team that was winning the game at the end of the third quarter. = 300

The proportion (p) of the team that was winning the game at the end of the third quarter: [tex]p=\dfrac{300}{375}=0.8[/tex]

Critical z-value for 90% confidence: z* = 1.645

Margin of error =[tex]z^*\sqrt{\dfrac{(1-p)p}{n}}[/tex]

The margin of error in a 90% confidence interval estimate of p [tex]=1.645\sqrt{\dfrac{0.2\times0.8}{300}}\\= 1.645\times\sqrt{0.00053333}\\\\=1.645\times0.0231\\\\=0.0379995\approx$$0.038[/tex]

Hence, the required margin of error = 0.038

Answer:

a) 20 - 3^2 = 11

b) 5th, 20 - 5^2 = -5

Step-by-step explanation:

The answer assumes your terms begin at 1. If the terms begin at zero

a) 16

b) 6th term

if you chose to be extremely technical you would take the square root of 20.1 or 20.00000009 but I'm assuming they want whole numbers

Answer:

a)11

b)5th term

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

Decision rule  is  

Fail to reject the null hypothesis

 The conclusion is  

There is sufficient evidence that indicate that there is a significant difference between the two treatments

Step-by-step explanation:

From the question we are told that  

    The sample size is  n =  12

    The first  mean is  [tex]M_1  =  55[/tex]

    The variance is  [tex]s^2_1 =  8[/tex]

    The second mean is  [tex]M_2  =  52[/tex]

     The second variance is [tex]s^2_2 =  4[/tex]

Let the level of significance be  [tex]\alpha  =  0.05[/tex]

The null hypothesis is  [tex]H_o  :  M_1 = M_2[/tex]

The alternative hypothesis is [tex]H_a  :  M_1 \ne M_2[/tex]

  Generally the test statistics is mathematically

     [tex]t = \frac{M_1 - M_2 }{ \sqrt{\frac{s_1^2}{n_1} +\frac{s_2^2}{n_2}} }[/tex]

=>   [tex]t = \frac{55 - 52 }{ \sqrt{\frac{8}{12} +\frac{4}{12 }} }[/tex]

=>   [tex]t = 1.1619 [/tex]

Generally the degree of freedom is mathematically represented as

      [tex]df = 12 -1[/tex]

=>    [tex]df = 11 [/tex]

Generally  from the t- distriibution table the critical  value  of  [tex]\alpha[/tex] at a degree of freedom of [tex]df = 11 [/tex]  is

    [tex]t_{0.05 , 11} =  2.20098516[/tex]

Here given that the critical value is greater than the t statistics value the

Decision rule  is  

Fail to reject the null hypothesis

 The conclusion is  

There is sufficient evidence that indicate that there is a significant difference between the two treatments

-4 is the x intercept.as in the values on the x-axis

Answer:

Im pretty sure it the first one

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

6.333

Step-by-step explanation:

Our triangle vertices are

(1,1)(5,1)(2,9)

We are to perform interpolation at point(3,5)

x and y values are interpolated

On vertices (5,1)(2,9)

x = 3

x1 = 5

X2 = 2

Y1 = 1

Y2 = 9

Formula for interpolation

Y = [y1+(x-x1)(y2-y1)]/x2-x

Y = 1+(3-5)(9-1)/2-5

Y = 1+[-2*8/-3]

Y = 1+16/3

From here we use use LCM to get:

19/3 = 6.333

Answer:

1000-20

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

the fraction and its decimal equivalent for the mark on the ruler

= 59/64 = 0.921875

Step-by-step explanation:

Given that;

A CARPENTER 's ruler is marked in thirty  seconds

mark on the ruler between 29/32 and 30/32​ is the average of the values

we know that average is the summation of all terms divided by the number of appearance of terms

so

= (29/32 + 30/32​) / 2

= ((29 + 30) / 32) / 2

= (59 / 32) / 2

= 59 / 64

= 0.921875

therefore the fraction and its decimal equivalent for the mark on the ruler = 59/64 = 0.921875