Answer:
Plasma, which constitutes 55% of blood fluid, is mostly water (92% by volume), and contains proteins, glucose, mineral ions, hormones, carbon dioxide (plasma being the main medium for excretory product transportation), and blood cells themselves.
Explanation:
Capillary motion is crucial for circulating water. Your body's cells would not hydrate without this flow, and crucial communication between your brain and body would slack off, hence blood contains water 92% water helps in capillary action.
What is Capillary action?Capillary action, also known as capillary effect or motion, is the process by which liquid moves through constricted areas without the aid of external forces like gravity but rather with the help of intermolecular forces that exist between the liquid and solid surface (s).
Adhesion: The attraction of two different molecules, such as the hydrogen and oxygen molecules found in water and plastic drinking straws.
Proteins, glucose, mineral ions, hormones, carbon dioxide (plasma is the principal medium for excretory product transfer), and blood cells themselves are contained in plasma, which makes up 55% of blood fluid. Plasma is mostly water (92% by volume) and contains water as well as several other substances.
Therefore, the water contains in the blood helps in capillary action.
To know more about Capillary action:
https://brainly.com/question/13228277
#SPJ2
Compare the amount of thermal energy required to MELT a solid with the amount of thermal energy released when the same liquid becomes a solid.
Consider a 50-turn circular loop with a radius of 1.55 cm in a 0.35-T magnetic field. This coil is going to be used in a galvanometer that reads 45 μA for a full-scale deflection. Such devices use spiral springs which obey an angular form of Hooke's law, where the restoring torque is:
τs = -κ θ.
Here κ is the torque constant and θ is the angular displacement, in radians, of the spiral spring from equilibrium, where the magnetic field and the normal to the loop are parallel.
Required:
a. Calculate the maximum torque, in newton meters, on the loop when the full-scale current flows in it.
b. What is the torque constant of the spring, in newton meters per radian, that must be used in this device?
Complete Question
Consider a 50-turn circular loop with a radius of 1.55 cm in a 0.35-T magnetic field. This coil is going to be used in a galvanometer that reads 45 μA for a full-scale deflection. Such devices use spiral springs which obey an angular form of Hooke's law, where the restoring torque is:
τs = -κ θ.
Here κ is the torque constant and θ is the angular displacement, in radians, of the spiral spring from equilibrium, where the magnetic field and the normal to the loop are parallel.
Required:
a. Calculate the maximum torque, in newton meters, on the loop when the full-scale current flows in it.
b. What is the torque constant of the spring, in newton meters per radian, that must be used in this device? Assume the full scale deflection is 60° from the spring's equilibrium position
Answer:
a
[tex]\tau_{m} = 5.95 *10^{-7} \ N \cdot m[/tex]
b
[tex]\beta = 2.83 *10^{-7} \ N \cdot m / rad [/tex]
Explanation:
From the question we are told that
The number of turns is N = 50
The radius is r = 1.55 cm = 0.0155 m
The magnetic field is B = 0.35 T
The induced current is [tex]I = 45 \mu A = 45 *10^{-6} \ A[/tex]
Generally the area of loop is mathematically represented as
[tex]A = \pi r^2[/tex]
=> [tex]A =3.142 * 0.0155^2[/tex]
=> [tex]A =0.000755\ m^2[/tex]
Generally the maximum torque is mathematically represented as
[tex]\tau_{m} = N * B * I * A[/tex]
=> [tex]\tau_{m} = 50 * 0.35 * 45 *10^{-6} * 0.000755[/tex]
=> [tex]\tau_{m} = 5.95 *10^{-7} \ N \cdot m[/tex]
Generally the torque 60° from the spring's equilibrium position is mathematically represented as
[tex]\tau = N * B * I * A * sin (60)[/tex]
=> [tex]\tau = 50 * 0.35 * 45 *10^{-6} * 0.000755 * sin (60)[/tex]
=> [tex]\tau = 2.973 *10^{-7} \ N \cdot m [/tex]
Generally the toque constant of the spring is mathematically represented as
[tex]\beta = \frac{\tau}{60}[/tex]
=> [tex]\beta = \frac{\tau}{\frac{\pi}{3}}[/tex]
=> [tex]\beta = \frac{2.973 *10^{-7}}{\frac{\pi}{3}}[/tex]
=> [tex]\beta = 2.83 *10^{-7} \ N \cdot m / rad [/tex]
A 126 N force is applied at an angle of 25.00 to a 8.50 kg block pressed against a rough vertical wall and the block slides down the wall at constant velocity. Calculate the coefficient of kinetic friction between the block and the wall.
Answer:
μk = 0.58
Explanation:
If the block is sliding down at constant speed, this means that no net force is acting upon it in the vertical direction.As the block is pressed on the wall, this means that it doesnt accelerate in the horizontal direction either, so no net force acts upon it in this direction also.In this direction, we have only two forces acting, equal and opposite each other, one is the normal force (exerted by the wall) and the other is the horizontal component of the applied force.If the applied force forms an angle of 25º with the wall (which is vertical), this means that we can get its projection along the horizontal direction, using simple trigonometry , as follows:[tex]F_{apph} = F_{app} * sin\theta = 126 N * sin 25 = 53.3 N[/tex]
⇒ [tex]F_{n} = - F_{apph} = -53.3 N[/tex]
In the vertical direction, we have three forces acting on the block: the weight pointing downward, the kinetic friction force (as we know that the block is sliding), and the vertical component of the applied force, in the same direction as the friction one.As we have already said, the sum of these forces must be 0.[tex]F_{g} + F_{appv} + F_{ff} = 0 (1)[/tex] where Fg is the weight of the block, Fappv is the vertical component of the applied force, and Fff is the kinetic friction force.Replacing these forces by their mathematical expressions, we have:[tex]F_{g} = m_{b} * g = 8.5 Kg * (-9.8 m/s2) = -83.3 N[/tex]
[tex]F_{appv} = F_{app}* cos\theta = 126 N * cos 25 = 114.2 N[/tex]
[tex]F_{ff} = \mu_{k}* F_{n} =\mu_{k} * (-53.3 N)[/tex]
Replacing in (1), and solving for μk, we finally get:μk = 0.58
HELP PLS GIVING BRAINLIEST!!
Radio station KBOB broadcasts at a frequency of 85.7 MHz on your dial using radio waves that travel at 3.00 × 108 m/s. Since most of the station's audience is due south of the transmitter, the managers of KBOB don't want to waste any energy broadcasting to the east and west. They decide to build two towers, transmitting in phase at exactly the same frequency, aligned on an east-west axis. For engineering reasons, the two towers must be AT LEAST 10.0 m apart. What is the shortest distance between the towers that will eliminate all broadcast power to the east and west?
Answer:
12.5 m
Explanation:
The first thing we would do is to calculate the wavelength. To do this, we use the formula
v = fλ, where
v = wave speed
f = frequency
λ = wavelength
If we make wavelength the formula, we have
wavelength = speed / frequency
Now, we substitute the values we had been given and we have
wavelength = (3 * 10^8 m/s) / (85.7 * 10^6 Hz) wavelength = 3.50 m
half of this said wavelength will be
= 3.50 / 2
= 1.75 m
As a result of the engineering constraints with the towers being more than 10 m apart, the distance can't be 1.75 m and as such, it has to be a multiple of 1.75m. So we say,
(10 / 1.75) = 5.7
So the separation will have to be 7 half wavelengths
= (7 * 1.75) = 12.5 m
A stone is thrown horizontally with an initial speed of 10m/s from the edge of the cliff. A stop watch measures the stone’s trajectory with time from the top of the hill to the bottom to be 6.7s. What is the height of the cliff?
Answer:
Answer and steps in the pic
use the hubble's law to determine the distance to a quasar receding at 75% the speed of light. The speed of light is 300,000 km/sec. assume Hubble's constant is
Complete question:
use the hubble's law to determine the distance to a quasar receding at 75% the speed of light. The speed of light is 300,000 km/sec. assume Hubble's constant is 2.2 x 10⁻⁵ km/s/Lyr
Answer:
The distance to the quasar is 1.02 x 10¹⁰ Lyr
Explanation:
Given;
speed of light, v = 300, 000 km/sec
Hubble's constant, H₀ = 2.2 x 10⁻⁵ km/s/Lyr
percentage of the quasar recession = 75% of speed of light
Hubble's Law is given by;
[tex]v =H_od\\\\d = \frac{v}{H_o}\\\\d= \frac{(0.75*300,000)}{2.2*10^{-5}}.Lyr\\\\d = 1.02*10^{10} \ Lyr[/tex]
Therefore, the distance to the quasar is 1.02 x 10¹⁰ Lyr
my heart strike him to dead.what figure of speech is that?
Answer:
Hyperbole
Explanation:
this is an extreme exaggeration or overstatement/ magnification
At a distance of 10.0 m from a loudspeaker, the sound intensity level is measured to be 70 dB. At what distance from the source will the intensity be 40 dB?
Answer:
At a distance of 100 m from the source the intensity will be 40 dB.
Explanation:
Sound intensity is the acoustic power transferred by a sound wave per unit area normal to the direction of propagation.
The sound intensity depends on the power of the sound source, where the higher the power the greater the intensity, the distance to the sound source, the greater the distance being the lower the intensity, and the nature of the transmission medium.
The conversion between intensity and decibels corresponds to:
[tex]L=10*log\frac{I}{I0}[/tex]
where I0 = 10⁻¹² W/m² and corresponds to a level of 0 decibels therefore.
In this case, you can apply the following relationship between two intensities and distance, considering that the intensity of the sound level decreases with distance:
[tex]L1 - L2=10*log\frac{I1}{I0} - 10*log\frac{I2}{I0}[/tex]
[tex]L1 - L2=10*(log\frac{I1}{I0} - *log\frac{I2}{I0})[/tex]
[tex]L1 - L2=10*[log(\frac{I1}{I0}\frac{I0}{I2})][/tex]
[tex]L1 - L2=10*[log(\frac{I1}{I2})][/tex]
Being L1= 70 dB and L2= 40 dB
[tex]70 dB - 40 dB=10*[log(\frac{I1}{I2})][/tex]
[tex]30=10*[log(\frac{I1}{I2})][/tex]
[tex]\frac{30}{10} =log(\frac{I1}{I2})[/tex]
[tex]3=log(\frac{I1}{I2})[/tex]
[tex]10^{3} =\frac{I1}{I2}[/tex]
[tex]1,000=\frac{I1}{I2}[/tex]
The intensity is inversely proportional to the square of the distance to the source. The relationship between the intensities I1 and I2 at distances d1 and d2 respectively is:
[tex]\frac{I1}{I2} =\frac{d2^{2} }{d1^{2} }[/tex]
Then:
[tex]1,000=\frac{d2^{2} }{d1^{2} }[/tex]
Being d1= 10 m
[tex]1,000=\frac{d2^{2} }{10^{2} }[/tex]
[tex]1,000=\frac{d2^{2} }{100}[/tex]
1,000*100= d2²
10,000= d2²
√10,000= d2
100 m= d2
At a distance of 100 m from the source the intensity will be 40 dB.
a. In one short sentence, explain why we call the force of gravity an attractive force.
b. Does a force of gravity exist between any two objects
Answer:
Explanation:
(a) The force of gravity is called an attractive force because it is the force (although weak) in which a planetary body or matter uses to attract an object towards itself.
(b) Yes, it does and the formula for force of gravity between any two object is
F = G[tex]\frac{m1m2}{r}[/tex]
where m1 and m2 are masses of the first and second object respectively
r is the distance between the center of the two masses
G is the gravitational constant
To practice Problem-Solving Strategy 17.1 for wave interference problems. Two loudspeakers are placed side by side a distance d = 4.00 m apart. A listener observes maximum constructive interference while standing in front of the loudspeakers, equidistant from both of them. The distance from the listener to the point halfway between the speakers is l = 5.00 m . One of the loudspeakers is then moved directly away from the other. Once the speaker is moved a distance r = 60.0 cm from its original position, the listener, who is not moving, observes destructive interference for the first time. Find the speed of sound v in the air if both speakers emit a tone of frequency 700 Hz .
Complete Question
The compete question is shown on the first uploaded question
Answer:
The speed is [tex] v = 350 \ m/s [/tex]
Explanation:
From the question we are told that
The distance of separation is d = 4.00 m
The distance of the listener to the center between the speakers is I = 5.00 m
The change in the distance of the speaker is by [tex]k = 60 cm = 0.6 \ m[/tex]
The frequency of both speakers is [tex]f = 700 \ Hz[/tex]
Generally the distance of the listener to the first speaker is mathematically represented as
[tex]L_1 = \sqrt{l^2 + [\frac{d}{2} ]^2}[/tex]
[tex]L_1 = \sqrt{5^2 + [\frac{4}{2} ]^2}[/tex]
[tex]L_1 = 5.39 \ m [/tex]
Generally the distance of the listener to second speaker at its new position is
[tex]L_2 = \sqrt{l^2 + [\frac{d}{2} ]^2 + k}[/tex]
[tex]L_2 = \sqrt{5^2 + [\frac{4}{2} ]^2 + 0.6}[/tex]
[tex]L_2 = 5.64 \ m [/tex]
Generally the path difference between the speakers is mathematically represented as
[tex]pD = L_2 - L_1 = \frac{n * \lambda}{2}[/tex]
Here [tex]\lambda[/tex] is the wavelength which is mathematically represented as
[tex]\lambda = \frac{v}{f}[/tex]
=> [tex] L_2 - L_1 = \frac{n * \frac{v}{f}}{2}[/tex]
=> [tex] L_2 - L_1 = \frac{n * v}{2f}[/tex]
=> [tex] L_2 - L_1 = \frac{n * v}{2f}[/tex]
Here n is the order of the maxima with value of n = 1 this because we are considering two adjacent waves
=> [tex] 5.64 - 5.39 = \frac{1 * v}{2*700}[/tex]
=> [tex] v = 350 \ m/s [/tex]
The speed of sound in air is 350 m/s
Since the distance between both speakers is 4 m, and the listener is standing 5 m away from halfway between them, the distance L from each loudspeaker to the listener, since the arrangement forms a right-angled triangle, using Pythagoras' theorem,
L = √[(5 m)² + (4/2 m)²]
= √[25 m² + (2 m)²]
= √[25 m² + 4 m²]
= √29 m² = 5.39 m.
Now, when one speaker is moved 60 cm = 0.6 m away from its original position, its distance from the listener is now
L' = √[(5 m)² + (4/2 + 0.6 m)²]
= √[25 m² + (2 m + 0.6 m)²]
= √[25 m² + (2.6 m)²]
= √[25 m² + 6.76 m²]
= √31.76 m²
= 5.64 m.
Now, the path difference when we first have destructive interference is
ΔL = L' - L
= 5.64 - 5.39
= 0.25
Since we have destructive interference for the first time when the speaker is moved, the path difference, ΔL = (n + 1/2)λ where λ = wavelength = v/f where v = speed of sound in air and f = frequency = 700 Hz.
Now, since we have destructive interference for the first time, n = 0.
So, ΔL = (n + 1/2)λ
ΔL = (0 + 1/2)v/f
ΔL = v/2f
Making v subject of the formula, we have
v = 2fΔL
Substituting the values of the variables into the equation, we have
v = 2fΔL
v = 2 × 700 Hz × 0.25 m
v = 350 m/s
So, the speed of sound in air is 350 m/s
Learn more about interference of sound here:
https://brainly.com/question/1346741
What is the car’s average velocity (in m/s) in interval between t=1.0s to t=1.5s?
Answer:
This question is incomplete
Explanation:
This question is incomplete. However, the formula for velocity is;
Velocity (in m/s) = distance/time
The distance the car covered in the completed question is divided by the difference in the time interval
The difference in the time interval will be = 1.5s - 1.0s = 0.5s
NOTE: the distance must be in meters or be converted to meters
An electric drill starts from rest and rotates with a constant angular acceleration. After the drill has rotated through a certain angle, the magnitude of the centripetal acceleration of a point on the drill is 7.9 times the magnitude of the tangential acceleration. What is the angle
Answer:
The angle is 3.95 rad.
Explanation:
The angle can be calculated as follows:
[tex] \omega_{f}^{2} = \omega_{0}^{2} + 2\alpha \theta [/tex]
Where:
[tex]\omega_{f}[/tex]: is the final angular speed
ω₀: is the initial angular speed = 0 (it starts from rest)
α: is the angular acceleration
θ: is the angle=?
The centripetal acceleration is:
[tex]a_{c} = \omega_{f}^{2}*r[/tex]
And the tangential acceleration is:
[tex] a_{T} = \alpha*r [/tex]
Since the magnitude of the centripetal acceleration is 7.9 times the magnitude of the tangential acceleration:
[tex]a_{c} = 7.9a_{T}[/tex]
[tex]\omega_{f}^{2}*r = 7.9*\alpha*r \rightarrow \alpha = \frac{\omega_{f}^{2}}{7.9}[/tex]
Now, the angle is:
[tex]\omega_{f}^{2} = 2(\frac{\omega_{f}^{2}}{7.9})\theta[/tex]
[tex] \theta = \frac{7.9}{2} = 3.95 rad [/tex]
Therefore, the angle is 3.95 rad.
I hope it helps you!
The angular distance traveled by the electric drill is 3.95 radians.
The given parameters;
initial angular speed, [tex]\omega_i[/tex] = 0centripetal acceleration, [tex]a_c[/tex] = 7.9aThe angular distance traveled by the electric drill is calculated as follows;
[tex]\omega_f^2 = \omega_i^2 + 2\alpha \theta[/tex]
The relationship between centripetal acceleration, tangential acceleration and angular speed is given as;
[tex]a_c = \omega ^2 r\\\\a = \alpha r\\\\a_c = 7.9a= 7.9\alpha r\\\\7.9\alpha r = \omega^2 r\\\\\alpha = \frac{\omega ^2}{7.9}[/tex]
Substitute the value of angular acceleration into the first equation;
[tex]\omega _f^2 = 0 + 2(\a (\frac{\omega _f^2}{7.9})\theta\\\\2\theta \omega_f^2 = 7.9\omega_f ^2\\\\\theta = \frac{7.9}{2} \\\\\theta = 3.95 \ rad[/tex]
Thus, the angular distance traveled by the electric drill is 3.95 radians.
Learn more about angular distance here: https://brainly.com/question/12680957
Which is a belief held by sociologists who work from a social-conflict
perspective?
O A. The best approach for a study is from a micro-level orientation.
O B. Personal background has little impact on how individuals react
with one another.
C. Some social patterns are helpful, while others are harmful.
D. Data are irrelevant to the study of sociology.
SUBMIT
Answer:
C. Some social patterns are helpful, while others are harmful.
Explanation:
Hope this was helpful, Have an amazing,spooky Halloween!!
When driving at slower speeds you need to use what type of steering
wheel movements compared to when driving at faster speeds? *
Answer:
slower speeds = larger and faster steering wheel movements
faster speeds = small and slow steering wheel movements
Explanation:
When driving at slower speeds you need to use larger and faster steering wheel movements. This is because at slow speeds the car does not have enough momentum to make certain maneuvers with small steering wheel movements in a given amount of time, therefore making large and faster steering wheel movements gives the car enough time with the momentum it has to make the desired maneuver. At faster speeds only small and slow steering wheel movements are needed and while cause the car to quickly change to the desired direction due to the increased momentum of the car.
How can you tell if hair was forcibly removed?
Answer:Explanation:
A microscopic hair examination can also determine if a hair was forcibly removed, artificially treated or diseased. A comparison microscope can be used to compare a questioned hair to a known hair sample in order to determine if the hairs are similar and if they could have come from a common source.
A shell is fired with a horizontal velocity in the positive x direction from the top of an 80 m high cliff. The shell strikes the ground 1330 m from the base of the cliff. What is the speed of the shell as it hits the ground
Answer:
V = 331.59m/s
Explanation:
First we need to calculate the time taken for the shell fire to hit the ground using the equation of motion.
S = ut + 1/2at²
Given height of the cliff S = 80m
initial velocity u = 0m/s²
a = g = 9.81m/s²
Substitute
80 = 0+1/2(9.81)t²
80 = 4.905t²
t² = 80/4.905
t² = 16.31
t = √16.31
t = 4.04s
Next is to get the vertical velocity
Vy = u + gt
Vy = 0+(9.81)(4.04)
Vy = 39.6324
Also calculate the horizontal velocity
Vx = 1330/4.04
Vx = 329.21m/s
Find the magnitude of the velocity to calculate speed of the shell as it hits the ground.
V² = Vx²+Vy²
V² = 329.21²+39.63²
V² = 329.21²+39.63²
V² = 108,379.2241+1,570.5369
V² = 109,949.761
V = √ 109,949.761
V = 331.59m/s
Hence the speed of the shell as it hits the ground is 331.59m/s
A ball of mass m is found to have a weight Wx on Planet X. Which of the following is a correct expression for the gravitational field strength of Planet X?
A. The gravitational field strength of Planet X is mg.
B. The gravitational field strength of Planet X is Wx/m.
C. The gravitational field strength of Planet X is 9.8 N/kg.
D. The gravitational field strength of Planet X is mWx.
Answer: B. The gravitational field strength of Planet X is Wx/m.
Explanation:
Weight is a force, and as we know by the second Newton's law:
F = m*a
Force equals mass times acceleration.
Then if the weight is:
Wx, and the mass is m, we have the equation:
Wx = m*a
Where in this case, a is the gravitational field strength.
Then, isolating a in that equation we get:
Wx/m = a
Then the correct option is:
B. The gravitational field strength of Planet X is Wx/m.
A cart with an unknown mass is at rest on one side of a track. A student must find the mass of the cart by using Newton’s second law. The student attaches a force probe to the cart and pulls it while keeping the force constant. A motion detector rests on the opposite end of the track to record the acceleration of the cart as it is pulled. The student uses the measured force and acceleration values and determines that the cart’s mass is 0.4kg . When placed on a balance, the cart’s mass is found to be 0.5kg . Which of the following could explain the difference in mass?
Answer choices:
A) The track was not level and was tilted slightly downward.
B) The student did not pull the cart with a force parallel to the track.
C) The wheels contain bearings that were rough and caused a significant amount of friction.
D) The motion sensor setting was incorrect. The student set it up so that motion away from the sensor would be the negative direction.
Answer: The correct answer is A) The track was not level and was tilted slightly downward.
Explanation: This is because of the two values: 0.4 kg and 0.5 kg. I won't go into much detail but due to this difference of mass, we know that the track was not level.
"The track was not level and was tilted slightly downward" could explain the difference in the mass.
Mostly because the university student or learners calculates a mass of just over the spring quantity, the vehicle speed seems to have been higher than there would have had to be.Option B, as well as Option C, are wrong because the acceleration would've been smaller in each of these 2 circumstances, so that computed mass would've been larger.
Thus Option A is appropriate.
Learn more:
https://brainly.com/question/11839345
See Conceptual Example 6 to review the concepts involved in this problem. A 12.0-kg monkey is hanging by one arm from a branch and swinging on a vertical circle. As an approximation, assume a radial distance of 86.4 cm is between the branch and the point where the monkey's mass is located. As the monkey swings through the lowest point on the circle, it has a speed of 1.33 m/s. Find (a) the magnitude of the centripetal force acting on the monkey and (b) the magnitude of the tension in the monkey's arm.
Answer:
(a) 24.56 N
(b) 142.28 N
Explanation:
(a)
The designation assigned to something like the net force pointed toward the middle including its circular route seems to be the centripetal force. The net stress only at lowest point constitutes of the strain throughout the arm projecting upward towards the middle as well as the weight pointed downwards either backwards from the center.
The centripetal function is generated from either scenario by Equation:
⇒ [tex]Fc = \frac{mv^2}{r}[/tex]
On putting the values, we get
⇒ [tex]=\frac{12\times 1.33^2}{0.864}[/tex]
⇒ [tex]=24.56 \ N[/tex]
(b)
Use T to denote whatever arm stress we can get at the bottom including its circle:
⇒ [tex]Fc = T - mg =\frac{ mv^2}{r}[/tex]
⇒ [tex]T = mg + Fc[/tex]
⇒ [tex]=12\times 9.81+24.56[/tex]
⇒ [tex]=142.28 \ N[/tex]
In this circuit, all the resistors are identical, they are assigned voltage V1, V2 and V3 which correspond to R1 R2 and R3.
Put the volume in order of lowest to highest.
PLEASE HELP, WILL GIVE BRAINLIEST, NEED A GOOD EXPLANATION NOT JUST ANSWER AS IM VERY CONFUSED.
for an emitted wavelength of 500 nanometers and a redshift of 0.4 what will be the observed wavelength g
Answer:
The observed wavelength is [tex] \lambda = 700nm[/tex] (color - Red)
Explanation:
From the question we are told that
The wavelength of the emitter is [tex]\lambda_ e = 500 nm = 500 *10^{-9} \ m[/tex]
The redshift is R = 0.4
Generally red shift is mathematically represented as
[tex]R = \frac{ \lambda - \lambda_e }{\lambda_e}[/tex]
=> [tex]0.4 = \frac{ \lambda - 500 *10^{-9} }{500 *10^{-9} }[/tex]
=> [tex] \lambda - 500*10^{-9} = 200*10^{-9} [/tex]
=> [tex] \lambda = 700 *10^{-9}[/tex]
=> [tex] \lambda = 700nm[/tex]
If 2000 kg cannon fires 2 kg projectile having muzzle velocity 200 m/s than the recoil speed of the cannon will be *
A. 0.2 m/s
B. 2 m/s
C. 4 m/s
D. 10 m/s
Answer:
D. 10 m/s
Explanation:
1 (4 points) A 2-kg ball is moving with a constant speed of 5 m/s in a horizontal circle whose radius is 50 cm. What is the magnitude of the net force on the ball
Answer:
100 N
Explanation:
The following data were obtained from the question:
Mass (m) = 2 Kg
Velocity (v) = 5 m/s
Radius (r) = 50 cm
Force (F) =.?
Next, we shall convert 50 cm to metre (m). This can be obtained as follow:
100 cm = 1 m
Therefore,
50 cm = 50 cm × 1 m / 100 cm
50 cm = 0.5 m
Therefore, 50 cm is equivalent to 0.5 m.
Finally, we shall determine the magnitude of the net force on the ball by using the following formula:
F = mv²/r
Mass (m) = 2 Kg
Velocity (v) = 5 m/s
Radius (r) = 0.5 m
Force (F) =.?
F = mv²/r
F = 2 × 5²/ 0.5
F = 2 × 25/ 0.5
F = 50 / 0.5
F = 100 N
Therefore, the magnitude of the net force on the ball is 100 N.
The magnitude of the net force on the ball will be "100 N".
Force and speedAccording to the question,
Mass, m = 2 kg
Velocity, v = 5 m/s
Radius, r = 50 cm or,
= 50 × [tex]\frac{1}{100}[/tex]
= 0.5 m
We know the relation,
Force, F = [tex]\frac{mv^2}{r}[/tex]
By substituting the values, we get
= [tex]\frac{2\times (25)^2}{0.5}[/tex]
= [tex]\frac{2\times 25}{0.5}[/tex]
= [tex]\frac{50}{0.5}[/tex]
= 100 N
Thus the above response is appropriate.
Find out more information about force here:
https://brainly.com/question/6504879
which statement is correct about the strength of forces?
-Electrostatic forces are exactly 10 times stronger than gravitational forces.
-Electrostatic forces are exactly 10 times weaker than gravitational forces.
-Electrostatic forces are trillions of times stronger than gravitational forces.
-Electrostatic forces are trillions of times weaker than gravitational forces.
Answer:
Thanks!!!!! adding this so it doesn’t get deleted.
Explanation:
1. Electrostatic forces are trillions of times stronger than gravitational forces. 2. normal force and friction 3. contact forces 4. The electrostatic forces from the contact of the hands with the paper causes the paper molecules to separate. 5. The electrostatic forces between the molecules of the board prevent the force of gravity from breaking the board apart.
The correct statement over here is that electrostatic forces are trillions of times stronger than gravitational forces. Hence, option C is correct.
What is an Electrostatic Force?One of the basic forces in the cosmos is electrostatic force. In the universe, there are four basic forces. These include gravitational force, electromagnetic force, weak nuclear force, and strong nuclear force. Under the umbrella of electromagnetic force is electrostatic force. Two charges placed apart are subject to the electrostatic force. The size of each charged and the separation between them determines how much electrostatic force there will be.
When two charges of the same type are brought together, whether positive or negative, they repel one another. It is known as the electrostatic force of repelling when it operates among two charges that are similar.
Therefore, the electrostatic forces are trillions of times stronger than the gravitational forces.
To know more about Electrostatic Force:
https://brainly.com/question/9774180
#SPJ2
A 50 kg bicyclist starts his ride down the road with an acceleration of 1m/s2 in air with a density of 1.2 kg/m3. If his velocity at a given moment is 2m/s, how much force is he exerting? Assume the area of his body is 0.5m^2.
a. The bicyclist is exerting 1.1 N of force.
b. The bicyclist is exerting 49 N of force.
c. The bicyclist is exerting 50 N of force.
d. The bicyclist is exerting 51 N of force.
Answer:
b. The bicyclist is exerting 49 N of force
Explanation:
Given;
mass of bicyclist start, m = 50 kg
acceleration, a = 1 m/s²
density of air, ρ = 1.2 kg/m³
velocity, v = 2 m/s
Area of the bicyclist body, A = 0.5 m²
The drag force on the bicyclist is given by ;
Fd = 0.5CρAv²
where;
C is drag coefficient = 0.9 for bicycle
Fd = 0.5 x 0.9 x 1.2 x 0.5 x 2²
Fd = 1.1 N
The force of the bicyclist is given by;
F = ma
F = 50 x 1
F = 50 N
The effective force exerted by the bicyclist is given by;
Fe = F - Fd = 50 N - 1.1 N
Fe = 49 N
Therefore, the force exerted by the bicyclist is 49 N
What are the standard international (si) units of distance
Answer:
meter
Explanation:
Answer: The International System of Units is a system of measurement based on 7 base units
Explanation: the metre, kilogram, second, ampere, Kelvin, mole, and candela. These base units can be used in combination with each other.
A 1000-turn solenoid is 50 cm long and has a radius of 2.0 cm. It carries a current of 18.0 A. What is the magnetic field inside the solenoid near its center
Answer:
The value is [tex]B = 0.0452 \ T [/tex]
Explanation:
From the question we are told that
The number of turns is N = 1000
The length is L = 50 cm = 0.50 m
The radius is r = 2.0 cm = 0.02 m
The current is I = 18.0 A
Generally the magnetic field is mathematically represented as
[tex]B = \mu_o * \frac{N }{L} * I[/tex]
Here [tex]\mu_o[/tex] is the permeability of free space with value
[tex]\mu_o = 4\pi * 10^{-7} N/A^2[/tex]
So
[tex]B = 4\pi * 10^{-7} * \frac{1000}{0.50} * 18.0[/tex]
=> [tex]B = 0.0452 \ T [/tex]
A man with a mass of 86.5 kg stands up in a 61-kg canoe of length 4.00 m floating on water. He walks from a point 0.75 m from the back of the canoe to a point 0.75 m from the front of the canoe. Assume negligible friction between the canoe and the water. How far does the canoe move?
Answer:
The displacement of the canoe is 1.46 m
Explanation:
Given that,
Mass of canoe = 61 kg
Mass of man = 86.5 kg
Length = 4 m
Let the the displacement of the canoe is x'
We need to calculate the displacement of the man
Using formula of displacement
[tex]x=x_{2}-x_{1}[/tex]
Put the value into the formula
[tex]x=4-(0.75+0.75)[/tex]
[tex]x=2.5\ m[/tex]
We need to calculate the displacement of the canoe
Using conservation of momentum
[tex]M_{m}v_{m}=(M_{c}+M_{m})v_{c}[/tex]
[tex]M_{m}\dfrac{x}{t}=(M_{c}+M_{m})\dfrac{x'}{t}[/tex]
[tex]86.5\times2.5=(61+86.5)\times x'[/tex]
[tex]x'=\dfrac{86.5\times2.5}{61+86.5}[/tex]
[tex]x'=1.46\ m[/tex]
Hence, The displacement of the canoe is 1.46 m
Hollywood and video games often depict the bad guys being "blown away" when they’re shot by a bullet (i.e. once hit, their feet leave the ground and they fly backwards). Assuming that even if a handgun cartridge did generate enough momentum for the bullet to do this, why is it still nonsense on-screen?
Answer:
Taking a look at Newton's third law of motion which states "for every force exerted, their is an opposite force equal in magnitude and opposite in direction on the first force".
Similarly if a bullet had enough forces behind it to hurl someone through the air when they were hit, a similar force would act on the person holding the gun that fired the bullet.
What we load into the gun is called a 'cartridge' Each piece is composed of four basic substance the casing, the bullet, the primer, and the powder.
The primer explodes lighting the powder which causes a buildup of pressure behind the bullet. This powder can be used in rifle cartages because the bullet chamber is designed to withstand greater pressures.
It is difficult in practice to measure the forces within a gun bagel, but the one easily measured parameter is the velocity with which the bullet exits muzzle velocity, therefore assuming that even if a handgun cartridge which generate enough momentum for the bullet to do this, it is still nonsense on screen in Hollywood and video.