why did the united states lag behind europe in implementing key social welfare programs during the first three decades of the twentieth century?
The United States lagged behind Europe in implementing key social welfare programs during the first three decades of the twentieth century due to the dominance of individualism and laissez-faire economic ideology.
During the early twentieth century, European countries, such as Germany and Great Britain, began to implement social welfare programs, including old-age pensions, unemployment insurance, and health care. However, the United States did not follow suit until much later.
One of the main reasons for this was the dominance of individualism and laissez-faire economic ideology in the United States. These beliefs held that the government should not interfere in the economy and that individuals should be responsible for their own welfare. This led to resistance to government intervention in social welfare programs.
For more questions like Twentieth century click the link below:
https://brainly.com/question/8447969
#SPJ4
Astronomers proposed what about the earth?
Famous astronomer proposed a model of the solar system that involved the Earth revolving around the sun, which is also according to NASA provision.
What were the famous astronomer proposal about?Copernicus, who was the father of modern astronomy, was a Polish astronomer and mathematician was the first European scientist to propose the heliocentric theory of the solar system, which states that Earth and other planets revolve around the sun.
Prior to the publication of his major astronomical work, "On the Revolutions of the Heavenly Spheres," in 1543, European astronomers argued that Earth was at the center of the universe, as most ancient philosophers did. Therefore, most astronomer proposed a model of the solar system that involved the Earth revolving around the sun, which is also according to NASA provision.
Read more about astronomer
brainly.com/question/28855574
#SPJ1
Read and analyze the quote below. Explain how and why the context of it relates to the "Revolution of 1800". Use content in the Alan Taylor reading to support your answer. Be sure to cite the pages
of the information you use.
###
The Reverend Timothy Dwight (1752-1817), president of Yale College, predicted that in the event of Jefferson’s election “the Bible would be cast into a bonfire, our holy worship changed into a dance of
[French] Jacobin phrensy, our wives and daughters dishonored, and our sons converted into the disciples
of Voltaire and the dragoons of Marat."
The quote is from the Reverend Timothy Dwight, who was a prominent figure in the Federalist Party and the President of Yale College in the late 18th century. He is expressing his fear and opposition to the election of Thomas Jefferson, who was the candidate of the Democratic-Republican Party, in the "Revolution of 1800".
The context of the quote relates to the political and cultural divisions between the Federalist Party and the Democratic-Republican Party during the "Revolution of 1800". The Federalists, of which Dwight was a member, were generally more conservative and advocated for a strong central government, while the Democratic-Republicans, led by Jefferson, were more liberal and advocated for states' rights and a smaller, less powerful central government.
Dwight's fear that "the Bible would be cast into a bonfire" and "our holy worship changed into a dance of [French] Jacobin phrensy" reflects the Federalists' belief that the Democratic-Republicans, who were seen as more secular and influenced by the ideals of the French Revolution, would undermine traditional religious values and morals in the United States. This sentiment is also reflected in Alan Taylor's reading "The Internal Enemy: Slavery and War in Virginia, 1772-1832" where he writes "Federalists warned that the election of Jefferson would bring atheism and anarchy" (Taylor, pg. 59).
In addition, Dwight's reference to "Voltaire and the dragoons of Marat" highlights the Federalists' fear that the Democratic-Republicans would import the radical and violent ideas of the French Revolution to the United States. This fear is also reflected in Taylor's reading where he writes "Federalists warned that the election of Jefferson would bring the Reign of Terror to America" (Taylor, pg. 59).
Overall, Dwight's quote reflects the Federalists' fear and opposition to the political and cultural changes that they believed would occur if Thomas Jefferson and the Democratic-Republican Party came to power during the "Revolution of 1800".
How did Truman's Loyalty Review Board pose a threat to civil liberties in postwar America?
Truman's Loyalty Review Board looked into government workers, and those found to be unfaithful were fired. Individuals under investigation were not permitted to view the evidence against them, which is a violation of their constitutional rights.
The fundamental components of Truman's directive created the foundation for an extensive and potent government organization to conduct loyalty checks. In every federal department and agency, loyalty boards were to be established. These boards were tasked with reviewing each employee using lists of "totalitarian, fascist, communist, or subversive" organizations that the attorney general had provided. They also relied on FBI investigations. A worker would be fired if there were "reasonable grounds" to question their commitment. The Civil Service Commission established a Loyalty Review Board to handle employee appeals.
Only a few employees whose loyalty could be "reasonably" questioned were found, thanks to Truman's loyalty program. Although some of the allegations that his administration was "soft" on communists did go away temporarily due to his decision. In 1949–1950, things underwent a significant transformation. The Soviet Union created the atomic bomb, the Communists conquered China, and Senator Joseph McCarthy delivered his infamous speech in which he claimed that the Department of State employed over 200 "known communists." The Red Scare was in full swing as a result of accusations that the Truman administration was "coddling" communists.
To learn more about Truman, click below:
https://brainly.com/question/1235801
#SPJ4
What does "blessed are those who mourn for they shall be comforted" mean?
This means we should avoid a common fundamental misunderstanding about the teaching of Jesus by realizing that God begins the Beatitudes with a guarantee that the kingdom of heaven belongs solely to those who acknowledge their spiritual poverty, repent, and believe the gospel (Matt. 5:3).
When thinking about the second beatitude, "Blessed are those who weep, for they shall be comforted," it is crucial to keep this in mind (gospel Matt. 5:4). When we read this, we might assume that God is consoling us in our grief over the loss of a loved one. In times of loss, believers undoubtedly feel God's comfort, but this is only one way the second beatitude's promise is realized.
Scripture mentions more causes for mourning among the Lord's people, and He keeps His promise to ease our pain in these circumstances as well.
To know more about God:
brainly.com/question/14172409
#SPJ4
in 1974, former president richard nixon was pardoned by select one: a. the supreme court. b. the federal court of appeals. c. the attorney general. d. congress. e. the president.
Answer:
E. The President
Which president mandated vaccinations during the American Revolution?
Answer: George Washington
Explanation:
Why could someone say "Britain was irresponsible in their handling of the bloodless German advancement"?
Britain was responsible for the running of the German advance during the interwar period( 1919- 1939).
During this period, Britain had a policy of conciliation towards Germany, which allowed Germany to rearm and take back homes lost in WWI without any consequences. This lack of action, combined with Britain's turndown to form alliances with other European countries, encouraged Germany to come more aggressive and eventually led to the launch of WWII.
Britain's reckless running of the German advancement during this time period allowed an aggressive, militaristic nation to gain power and launch a ruinous war that could have been averted.
To know more about German advance visit:
https://brainly.com/question/29842988
#SPJ4
Western settlement after the Revolutionary War was in part due to the federal government's lack of money. The federal government sold western land to settlers through the following laws.
CHECK ALL THAT APPLY!
Western settlement after the Revolutionary War was in part due to the federal government's lack of money. The federal government sold western land to settlers through the following laws.
CHECK ALL THAT APPLY!
The Ordinance of 1775
The Northwest Ordinance
The Ordinance of 1785
Land Act of 1800
The Northeast Ordinance
Land Act of 1805
What was the significant difference between Elizabeth I and Charles I?
Even though Elizabeth was next in line after Charles, she did not have English support because she was a woman.
Elizabeth was a Catholic who was tolerant to Protestants, while Charles was an intolerant Protestant.
Elizabeth did not directly challenge the authority of parliament, while Charles tried to rule defying parliament.
Elizabeth had to establish a new royal line, while Charles was part of a well-established family.What was the significant difference between Elizabeth I and Charles I?
Even though Elizabeth was next in line after Charles, she did not have English support because she was a woman.
Elizabeth was a Catholic who was tolerant to Protestants, while Charles was an intolerant Protestant.
Elizabeth did not directly challenge the authority of parliament, while Charles tried to rule defying parliament.
Elizabeth had to establish a new royal line, while Charles was part of a well-established family.What was the significant difference between Elizabeth I and Charles I?
Even though Elizabeth was next in line after Charles, she did not have English support because she was a woman.
Elizabeth was a Catholic who was tolerant to Protestants, while Charles was an intolerant Protestant.
Elizabeth did not directly challenge the authority of parliament, while Charles tried to rule defying parliament.
Elizabeth had to establish a new royal line, while Charles was part of a well-established family.What was the significant difference between Elizabeth I and Charles I?
Even though Elizabeth was next in line after Charles, she did not have English support because she was a woman.
Elizabeth was a Catholic who was tolerant to Protestants, while Charles was an intolerant Protestant.
Elizabeth did not directly challenge the authority of parliament, while Charles tried to rule defying parliament.
Elizabeth had to establish a new royal line, while Charles was part of a well-established family.What was the significant difference between Elizabeth I and Charles I?
Even though Elizabeth was next in line after Charles, she did not have English support because she was a woman.
Elizabeth was a Catholic who was tolerant to Protestants, while Charles was an intolerant Protestant.
Elizabeth did not directly challenge the authority of parliament, while Charles tried to rule defying parliament.
Elizabeth had to establish a new royal line, while Charles was part of a well-established family.What was the significant difference between Elizabeth I and Charles I?
Even though Elizabeth was next in line after Charles, she did not have English support because she was a woman.
Elizabeth was a Catholic who was tolerant to Protestants, while Charles was an intolerant Protestant.
Elizabeth did not directly challenge the authority of parliament, while Charles tried to rule defying parliament.
Elizabeth had to establish a new royal line, while Charles was part of a well-established family.What was the significant difference between Elizabeth I and Charles I?
Even though Elizabeth was next in line after Charles, she did not have English support because she was a woman.
Elizabeth was a Catholic who was tolerant to Protestants, while Charles was an intolerant Protestant.
Elizabeth did not directly challenge the authority of parliament, while Charles tried to rule defying parliament.
Elizabeth had to establish a new royal line, while Charles was part of a well-established family.What was the significant difference between Elizabeth I and Charles I?
Even though Elizabeth was next in line after Charles, she did not have English support because she was a woman.
Elizabeth was a Catholic who was tolerant to Protestants, while Charles was an intolerant Protestant.
Elizabeth did not directly challenge the authority of parliament, while Charles tried to rule defying parliament.
Elizabeth had to establish a new royal line, while Charles was part of a well-established family.What was the significant difference between Elizabeth I and Charles I?
What do you think the photographer wants you to notice? To think? To feel?
• What choices has he or she made in taking the picture for example, in lighting or the placement of the camera--that convey a point of view?
Whose idea was it to take this picture? Who do you think paid for it?
1) The photographer intends for the audience to notice the setting of the picture. The photographer wants the observer to be able to go back in time to see what it meant to have an agrarian culture.
2) The choices that were made in taking the picture include ensuring that very good-looking horses were selected, yoked with agricultural equipment and positioned such that the perspective indicates a farmhouse at the background
3) It is not clear who exactly coined the idea for the picture but the person must have grown up in Mary land as this is a picture of a place in Beltsville, Maryland, in 1935.
4) It is very possible that the owner of the farmland paid for the picture.
What is Agrarian Culture?An agrarian civilization, often known as an agricultural society, is any community whose economy is centered on the production and upkeep of crops and farms.
Another method to characterize an agricultural society is to look at how percent of a country's overall output comes from agriculture.
Learn more about Settings:
https://brainly.com/question/11678414
#SPJ1
Which disease theory suggested that diseases could arise in localised areas and be affected by things such as poor drainage or sudden changes in weather?
Germ theory
Spontaneous generation
Pasteurisation
Homeopathy
Koch’s postulates
According to the germ hypothesis, diseases could develop locally and be influenced by things like poor drainage or abrupt changes in the weather. As a result, answer option (A) is correct.
What is germ theory?Many diseases have a currently recognized scientific theory, which is the germ theory of disease. It claims that pathogens, or "germs," are microorganisms that cause disease. They invade people, other animals, and other live hosts because they are too small to be noticed without magnification.
Within their hosts, they can multiply and expand, potentially causing disease. The term "germ" encompasses not only bacteria but also other microorganisms like fungus and protists, as well as dead pathogens like viruses, prions, and viroids that can still spread disease.
Hence, option (A) is accurate.
Learn more about germ theroy, from:
brainly.com/question/17636153
#SPJ1
after becoming a buddha siddhartha gautama challenged the hindu belief that
He then sent missionaries to other countries to spread Buddha's message where it was received so well that Buddhism became more popular in countries like Sri Lanka, China, Thailand, and Korea than it was in India - a situation which, actually, is ongoing – and Buddhist thought developed further after that.
How did imperialim and nationalim competition among nation lead to 2 major world war
Imperialism is a system in which a strong nation occupies, governs, and takes advantage of weaker nations. Before World War I, a number of European countries held imperial positions. Early in the 20th century, nationalism was a powerful force in Europe and a major factor in the outbreak of World War I.
Imperial rivalry and the quest for additional lands and possessions fueled friction between the major European powers and contributed to the start of the conflict. Colonies are ruled by the imperial nation, a puppet administration, or local allies. In the colony, there is frequently a military presence to uphold law and order, put down uprisings and opposition, and discourage imperial competitors.
A strong sense of patriotism or loyalty to one's country is known as nationalism. Nationalists elevate their own country's interests above those of other nations by exaggerating its significance or qualities.
Through their statements and language, politicians, diplomats, and royals helped to foster this nationalism. Additionally, press coverage and popular culture were heavily influenced by nationalist sentiment. Nationalist rhetoric and provocative articles, like rumors about rival countries and their sinister intentions, were commonplace in many periodicals. Literature, music, theater, and visual arts all contained nationalist concepts.
To learn more about nationalism, click below:
https://brainly.com/question/1018147
#SPJ4
Compare and contrast the revolts against the Ottoman empire in Greece and Armenia.
The main differences between the Greek and Armenian revolts was their timing. The Greek War of Independence began in 1821 and lasted until 1832, while the Armenian national movement did not gain momentum until the late 19th century, with the main revolt taking place between 1894 and 1896.
Essay on the revolts against the Ottoman empire in Greece and Armenia:The revolts against the Ottoman Empire in Greece and Armenia were both driven by the desire for independence and self-government, but there were also significant differences between the two movements.
The Greek War of Independence was led by a coalition of leaders and was largely focused on military action. The Greek rebels were able to gain support from European powers, especially Russia, which helped to weaken the Ottoman Empire's hold on the region. But, the Armenian national movement was more of a peaceful protest against Ottoman rule, which was met with brutal repression by Ottoman government.
Read more about revolts
brainly.com/question/18317211
#SPJ1
the dred scott decision convinced more people, especially republicans that there really were no states that could be called what?
The dred scott decision convinced more people, especially republicans that there really were no states that could be free state.
ABOUT FREE STATEThe Free State, known as Orange Free State until the 28th of June 1995 when its name was changed, is a province of South Africa. Its capital is Bloemfontein, which is also South Africa's judicial capital. Its historical origins lie in the Boer republic called the Orange Free State and later Orange Free State Province.
HistoryThe current borders of the province date from 1994 when the Bantustans were abolished and reincorporated into South Africa. It is also the only one of the four original provinces of South Africa not to undergo border changes, apart from the reincorporation of Bantustans, and its borders date from before the outbreak of the Boer War.
Learn more about free states at
https://brainly.com/question/1238899.
#SPJ4
most medieval europeans believed that when natural disasters like earthquakes occurred, the cause was
Most medieval Europeans believed that natural disasters such as earthquakes were caused by God's wrath or the devil's influence.
They believed that natural disasters were a sign of divine displeasure or were caused by malevolent forces. Earthquakes were seen as punishments for sins committed by the people and were taken as warnings to repent and return to the right path.
Natural disasters were also sometimes interpreted as signs of the end of the world, or a sign of impending disaster.
People of the time often tried to appease God or the devil through prayer and sacrifice, hoping to avert disaster and bring about peace and prosperity. Some communities even built churches or shrines in locations prone to natural disasters, hoping to protect themselves from the wrath of God or the devil.
Learn more about medieval europeans :
https://brainly.com/question/20850350
#SPJ4
it's true or false differing views on what the nation should be come led to factions and the rise of political parties
The statement differing views on what the nation should be come led to factions and the rise of political parties is true.
What is meant by political factions?An individual or group that works toward a similar political goal but varies in certain ways from the rest of the political body is called a political faction.
Its activities might be more dependable and steady due to the factional system's presence. The organization is able to function without having to appease the whims of several uncompromising people who may otherwise lead to a split by reaching compromises and engaging in give-and-take amongst groups.
Read more on political factions here: https://brainly.com/question/25815264
#SPJ1
democrat introduces legislation to make white people criticizing minorities a federal crime
In a free and fair democratic election that stunned the globe in 1994, South Africans replaced president F. W. de Klerk with Nelson Mandela.
The nonviolent revolution in South Africa began 25 years ago. Even in the 1980s, experts predicted that any shift away from black dominant part authority and white minority mastery would hasten a foolish common war. In a free and fair democratic election that stunned the globe in 1994, South Africans replaced president F. W. de Klerk with Nelson Mandela. The future of South Africa held a huge guarantee in 1991. After a protracted period of the ruthless, legalized racial segregation known as apartheid, Nelson Mandela was released from prison, the African National Congress (ANC) was no longer subject to restrictions, and negotiations for a new constitution had begun. Political animosity between the ANC and its rivals remained an unavoidable fact, although
Learn more about Democratic election here:
https://brainly.com/question/20304452
#SPJ4
The complete question is:
Democrat introduces legislation to make white people criticizing minorities a federal crime: True/False
How did ancient farmers in the tropical lowlands of mesoamerica cope with poor soils and thick forest?
Answer:
In the explanation:
Explanation:
Ancient farmers in the tropical lowlands of Mesoamerica, such as the Maya, developed a number of techniques to cope with the poor soils and thick forests of the region. One such technique was terrace agriculture, in which farmers built terraces on the sides of hills to create level areas for planting. This allowed them to take advantage of thin soils and increased sunlight while also preventing soil erosion. Another technique was the creation of raised fields or chinampas, which were small plots of land created by piling up soil and then flooding it. This method allowed farmers to grow crops in nutrient-rich soil that was artificially created and took advantage of the water table.
Additionally, ancient Mesoamerican farmers used a complex system of irrigation, canals, dams, and reservoirs to manage water resources and control flooding. They also used slash-and-burn agriculture, clearing small areas of forest, planting crops, and then moving on when the soil was depleted. They also developed a variety of crop rotation methods, intercropping and agroforestry, which allowed them to sustainably use the land over time.
The ancient Mesoamerican farmers were also skilled in identifying and cultivating a wide range of crops suitable for the tropical lowlands, for example, maize, beans, squash, and manioc. They also domesticated a number of animals such as turkeys, dogs, and also developed a system of trade and exchange to get the resources they couldn't produce themselves.
In summary, ancient farmers in the tropical lowlands of Mesoamerica coped with poor soils and thick forests through a combination of techniques including terrace agriculture, raised fields, irrigation systems, slash-and-burn agriculture, crop rotation, agroforestry, and the cultivation of a wide range of crops and domestication of animals.
Has anyone done the Student Guide "Create a poster of a medieval manor. " If so, does anyone have any examples of theirs?
The Dark Passing was the most important of the many factors that caused the middle age estate system to collapse down a long time ago.
The massive bequest that the ruler gave to a master for the medieval-era home. The villa served as both the master's and his family's residence as well as the estate's central gathering place. Workers were given permission to live on the estate in exchange for working the demesne, or land set aside for the master. The fortified lodge emerged around the fourteenth century. These mid-strengthened mansions had a lumber rooftop and weren't quite palaces, but they were more advanced than the Saxon corridor. The base materials were block or stone. The Dark Passing was the most important of the many factors that caused the middle age estate system to collapse a long time ago.
Learn more about Medieval-era home here:
https://brainly.com/question/29746146
#SPJ4
what occured after the liberation of the death camps when people found out about the holocaust
A small number of those who survived the Nazi camp complex came back to make sure the location wouldn't be erased from history.
What is the holocaust?The word "holocaust," which means "burnt offering," is derived from ancient Greek. The phrase was occasionally used to describe the deaths of huge groups of individuals before the Second World War, but since 1945, it has almost exclusively been associated with the extermination of European Jews during the conflict. Because of this, we refer to it as "the Holocaust." Jews often use the Hebrew word "Shoah," which means "catastrophe," to describe it.
The Holocaust, often spelled as the Shoah, was World War II's mass murder of Jews in Europe. Six million Jews, or roughly two-thirds of the Jewish population in Europe, were methodically murdered by Nazi Germany and its allies between 1941 and 1945 while living under German occupation.
Learn more about holocaust here:
https://brainly.com/question/12962
#SPJ1
You learned about the importance of a personal budget and a number of ways to achieve your financial goals and to budget for them.
Talk to a mentor, family member, or relative between the ages of mid-thirties to mid-forties and who is employed. Ask them how they have worked
toward achieving their financial goals. Base your questions on the following prompts:
1. A strategy for Increasing savings each year
2. Two types of employee incentives that could help save money
3. Three anticipated and three unanticipated expenses
Budgeting is important because it allows you to control your spending, keep track of your expenses, and save more money. Budgeting can also help you make better financial decisions, plan for emergencies, get out of debt, and stay on track with your long-term financial goals.
What are the importance of personal budget to individual or family?The first step in regaining control of your personal financial wellness is to understand how much money comes in each month and how much is spent. The ideal situation is, of course, to have more income than expenses.
A personal or household budget is essentially a financial plan that is used to allocate expected income toward paying monthly expenses and debts. Spending history influences how much money is allocated to each budget item. A budget should include a provision for saving.
The foundation of budgeting is always the same: tracking your money, not only to know where it is going but also to plan how to spend or save it better.
Read more about personal budget
brainly.com/question/3743472
#SPJ1
in what year did the nazis come to power in germany?
The Nazi Party's precipitous climb to power began in 1930 when it won 107 seats in the Reichstag, Germany's parliament. Hitler became chancellor in January 1933 and quickly established himself as Germany's ultimate dictator.
The year 1933 was important in terms of Nazi political achievement. Traditionally, the Chancellor was appointed by the leader of the party with the most seats in the Reichstag. President Paul von Hindenburg, on the other hand, was hesitant to appoint Hitler as chancellor.
Following lengthy backroom talks involving businessmen, Hindenburg's son, former chancellor Franz von Papen, and Hitler, Hindenburg acquiesced and formally named Adolf Hitler as Germany's next chancellor on 30 January 1933. Hitler, despite being chancellor, was not yet an absolute dictator.
To learn more about Hitler, Click here:
https://brainly.com/question/12778492
#SPJ4
7. Why did Plato believe tyrants would be problems for the people?
Plato believed that tyrants would be problems for the people because he believed that tyrants were individuals who sought power for their own personal gain, rather than for the benefit of the community. In his work, "The Republic," Plato argues that tyrants are driven by their own desires for wealth, power, and pleasure, and that they will use their power to exploit and oppress the people.
What was an effect of the brutality of World War I on writers such as F. Scott Fitzgerald and Ernest Hemingway?
a. They questioned the positive, optimistic picture of humanity with which they had grown up.
b. They decided that American values and ideals should be imposed on the rest of the world.
c. They focused their attention on accurately describing the horrible violence they saw on the battlefield.
d. They believed that art and literature were meaningless and offered humanity nothing.
Answer: They had lost their faith in the goodness of humanity as a result of the violence of World War I.
Explanation: Honestly, it has got to be either c. or d., but I think it's d. in my thought.
martin luther king jr. challenges and accomplishments ?
Martin Luther King Jr. was the driving force behind watershed events such as the Montgomery Bus Boycott and the 1963 March on Washington, which helped bring about such landmark legislation as the Civil Rights Act and the Voting Rights Act.
About Martin Luther King Jr.Martin Luther King Jr. Day (officially Birthday of Martin Luther King, Jr.,and often referred to shorthand as MLK Day) is a federal holiday in the United States marking the birthday of Martin Luther King Jr. It is observed on the third Monday of January each year.
Born in 1929, King's actual birthday is January 15 (which in 1929 fell on a Tuesday). The holiday is similar to holidays set under the Uniform Monday Holiday Act. The earliest Monday for this holiday is January 15 and the latest is January 21.
King was the chief spokesperson for nonviolent activism in the Civil Rights Movement, which protested racial discrimination in federal and state law. The campaign for a federal holiday in King's honor began soon after his assassination in 1968.
President Ronald Reagan signed the holiday into law in 1983, and it was first observed three years later on January 20, 1986. At first, some states resisted observing the holiday as such, giving it alternative names or combining it with other holidays. It was officially observed in all 50 states for the first time in 2000.
Learn more about Martin Luther King Jr. at https://brainly.com/question/393404.
#SPJ4
Based on information in the article, which of these happened after the passage of the Civil Rights Act?
The effect of the passage of the Civil Rights Act was that A. Democrats lost political support in the South
What happened after the passage of the Civil Rights Act ?The Dixiecrats, a term for Southern Democrats who opposed the civil rights movement's advancements, persisted in their opposition. Prior to the Republican Party's founding in the previous century, the Democratic Party had a propensity to rule the South. But when Democrats Kennedy and Johnson sided with the civil rights movement, party bonds were tested and shattered.
The same voters gravitated toward Republican candidates like Richard Nixon in subsequent elections. With the exception of Georgia Governor Jimmy Carter in 1976, no Democratic candidate for president has been able to win the majority of southern states since 1960.
Find out more on the civil rights act at https://brainly.com/question/385896
#SPJ1
Options for this question include:
A. Democrats lost political support in the south
B. Democrats lost any chance of winning the presidency
C.Republicans became the dominant party in the northeast
d. Republicans lost political support in the south
the crew of the starship enterprise encounters the floating head of zsa zsa gabor.
It is true that the crew of starship enterprise encounters floating head of Zsa Zsa Gabor.
What is a crew?In an organized or hierarchical organization, a crew is a group or a class of people who collaborate on the same project. Where a crew works is known as a crewyard or workyard. The word has nautical implications, alluding to ship operations, particularly those of a sailing ship, which usually involve a chain of command and call for a range of crew members with different skills. Despite the fact that the two teams together make up the ship's company, officers and crew are clearly separated in traditional nautical jargon. Members of a crew are usually referred to as crewmen or crew-members. The rowing sport known as crew also refers to teams competing in racing shells.
To learn more about company, visit:
https://brainly.com/question/714966
#SPJ1
Question 4
Now think about the information you learned in all three passages. How do you think Las Casas would
feel about the respective actions of Columbus and Cortés toward the people in Hispaniola and
Tenochtitlan? Why? Your answer should be in the form of a 75 to 100 word paragraph.
It is most likely that Las Casas would have been deeply critical of the actions of Columbus and Cortés towards the indigenous peoples of Hispaniola and Tenochtitlan.
How did Las Casas felt about the actions of Columbus and Cortés?Las Casas was a strong advocate for the rights of indigenous peoples and was critical of the violence and exploitation that was inflicted upon them by Spanish colonizers. He believed that the indigenous peoples should be treated with respect and dignity and that forced labor and violence were unacceptable methods of colonization.
Also, he stated that the natives were innocent sheep and that they were devoid of craft and malice. Therefore, it is likely that he would have condemned the actions of Columbus and Cortés as cruel and unjust because they explored and violated the indigenous peoples.
Read more about Las Casas
brainly.com/question/17177002
#SPJ1
Explain what the Joint-Stock Trading Company in the European Age of Exploration is in ONLY ONE sentence.
With investors purchasing stock in a company, the joint-stock company operated similarly to the modern corporation. It entailed several people pooling their resources for a single objective.
What were European joint stock companies?The first joint-stock firms appeared in Europe during the Middle Ages, and their use increased throughout the Renaissance and the first wave of European colonialism. In order for investors to pool their resources and reduce personal risk, joint-stock firms were developed.
The contemporary corporation's predecessor was the joint-stock company. Stock was sold to high net worth investors who contributed funds and carried little risk in a joint stock company. These businesses had previously shown success in trading endeavors. The rewards came in very quickly, and the risk was little.
Thus, With investors purchasing stock in a company, the joint-stock company operated similarly to the modern corporation.
For more information about European joint stock companies, click here
https://brainly.com/question/29493498
#SPJ1