Answer:
9670 feet
Step-by-step explanation:
The height given (8219.5 ft) is 85% OF ORIGINAL, hence original is much higher. But how do we figure this out?
we translate word problem to equation.
8219.5 IS 85% of TOTAL
Firstly, 85% = 85/100 = 0.85
Remember, is means =
of means multiplication
So we have:
8219.5 = 0.85 * Total
Hence, total = [let total be 7]
8219.5 = 0.85 * t
t = 8219.5/0.85 = 9670 feet
Is the table above proportional or non-proportional?
Answer: I think you should divide them all and if you get the same answer it’s proportional if you don’t get the same answer it’s non-proportional
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
It is non-proportional.
Step-by-step explanation:
The table is non-proportional because it expresses a curved line instead of a straight line.
Kevin went to see his favorite sports team play. His car can go 400 miles on one tank of gas. If he used 30% of a full tank of gas, how many miles did he travel?
(answer this and show your work)
Kevin traveled _answer here_ miles.
(Type an integer or a decimal.)
Answer: 120
120
Step-by-step explanation:
I honestly can’t explain but I think you have to do this (actually I did the work so I’m right)
P/w = part/whole = ?/400
%/100= percent/100 = 30%/100
These numbers are equivalent
If you don’t understand the top then here is how to do the work-
400x30=12000
12000/100=120
Therefore it’s 120
Sarah thinks that the
following expressions are
equivalent:
2x + 3 = x/2+ 3/4
Is she right? If so, prove
that these two expressions
are equivalent. If not, what
error(s) did she make?
please help! i’m having a rough time on this, could someone answer this question?
Answer:
y= -18
a= -18
Step-by-step explanation:
2y+3 = 3(y+7)
2y+3=3y+21
-21 -21
2y-18=3y
-2y -2y
-18=y