The correct option is (B), a federal court has no discretion to exercise supplemental (pendent) jurisdiction over the state law claim; it must transfer all claims to the state court.
In some situations, the plaintiff will be able to sue the defendant on both federal and state grounds. The federal court has the option to exercise supplemental (pendent) jurisdiction over the claim based on state law even though there may not be diversity. This is possible if the two claims are sufficiently connected to constitute one case or controversy and are such that a plaintiff would typically be expected to try them all in one court proceeding.
If the claims are unrelated, a federal court cannot exercise its discretion to exercise jurisdiction. Therefore, it is incorrect to say that the court has discretion regardless of how closely related the claims are. It is up to the court to decide whether or not to use its additional jurisdiction in this case.
As a result, neither of the answer options that claim the court has the authority to exercise additional (pendent) jurisdiction over the state law claim is true. It is not required to use discretion or to refer the claims to state court.
To learn more about Diversity Jurisdiction, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/14598342
#SPJ4
Which of these statements is true?
a. Citizens who are governed by the absolute decisions of the ruler are always happy.
b. As long as the nation is prospering and the people are safe, it is totally possible for the citizens to
accept the rule of a fearful and authoritarian ruler and be happy.
c. Oftentimes people may not accept their leader because they are tired of being governed.
d. According to Machiavelli, it is better for a leader of a government to be loved than feared.
the last-minute judicial appointments by adams were called
Answer:The midnight judges I hope this helps
Explanation:
After the Senate confirmed these appointments on March 3, Adams signed the official commissions, not finishing until late into the night of his last day in office (hence the group came to be known as the midnight judges).The new judges were known as the Midnight Judges because Adams was said to be signing their appointments at midnight prior to President Thomas Jefferson's inauguration. The famous Supreme Court case of Marbury v.
injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere speech
We are woven together in an unbreakable web of reciprocity and bound by our shared fate. Anything that directly impacts one also indirectly impacts everyone.
In social psychology, reciprocity is the social custom of rewarding good deeds by performing good deeds in return. Reciprocity is a social construct that states that, contrary to what the self-interest model would suggest, individuals are usually considerably kinder and more cooperative in reaction to friendly activities. Conversely, in response to hostile actions, people are frequently much more nasty and even violent. Building lasting connections and exchanges is made possible by reciprocity.
Learn more about reciprocity here
https://brainly.com/question/18575915
#SPJ4
How does the structure and operations of Congress reflect the republican ideal of limited government via elected representatives?
The structure and operations of Congress are designed to reflect the republican ideal of limited government via elected representatives. This means that the legislative branch is responsible for creating laws that govern the nation, while the executive branch is responsible for carrying out those laws. The judiciary is responsible for interpreting the law and ensuring that it is applied fairly and evenly.
Congress is made up of two chambers: the House of Representatives and the Senate. Each state has a certain number of representatives based on its population, while each senator represents an entire state. Representatives are elected to two-year terms, while senators are elected to six-year terms. This staggered election cycle ensures that one chamber is always up for reelection, providing voters with a constant opportunity to hold their representatives accountable.The Constitution grants Congress a number of specific powers, including the power to tax, borrow money, declare war, and regulate interstate commerce. In addition, Congress has the power to pass any law necessary and proper for carrying out its other constitutional powers. This expansive view of congressional authority was affirmed by the Supreme Court in McCulloch v. Maryland (1819), which held that Congress has implied powers in addition to its express powers. The structure of Congress thus reflects the republican ideal of limited government via elected representatives. The separation of powers between the legislative and executive branches ensures that no one branch becomes too powerful, while the staggered election cycles provide voters with a way to hold their representatives accountable.
Learn more about Congress here
https://brainly.com/question/4736734
#SPJ4
A recently enacted federal statute requires the President to make each appointment of a United States ambassador to a foreign country from a list of three individuals. The list is to be compiled by the Senate Foreign Relations Committee and approved by the full Senate in advance of the appointment. The statute also provides that Senate confirmation of the appointment is deemed to occur automatically 30 days after the time the President names an appointee from the list, unless the full Senate determines otherwise within the 30-day period. Is this statute constitutional?
Answers:
No, because the statute violates the constitutional requirements for appointment of principal officers of the United States.
No, because the statute impermissibly restricts the plenary foreign affairs powers of the President.
Yes, because the statute is consistent with the constitutional requirement that the presidential appointment of ambassadors be with the advice and consent of the Senate.
Yes, because the statute is a necessary and proper measure in furtherance of Congress's power to regulate commerce with foreign states.
Yes, because the statute is consistent with the constitutional requirement that the presidential appointment of ambassadors is with the advice and consent of the Senate.
The House of Representatives is the lower body of the United States Congress, and the United States Senate is its upper chamber. Together, they make up the United States' national bicameral legislature.
The Senate is the only body with the authority to give advice and consent to treaty ratification and to approve presidential appointments that call for it. However, there are two exceptions to this rule: any contract involving international trade and the nominations to the Vice Presidency must also be approved by the House.
Learn more about Senate here brainly.com/question/26503288
#SPJ4
are the laws in the cities and counties, and they are lower than the state constitution and statutes in the hierarchy of the sources of law at the state level
The Rule of Law are the laws in the cities and counties, and they are lower than the state constitution and statutes in the hierarchy of the sources of law at the state level that regulates the affairs of a nation's constitution.
The source of all laws in the american legal system is state Constitution in the United States. It establishes that the federal law or federal constitution and take precedence over state laws and even state constitutions. It is commonly referred to as the Supremacy Clause.
Constitutional law is considered the highest and should not be supplanted by either of the other two sources law and it is the most preeminent source of law and protections the federal supremacy. A principle of moral law or divine that is considered to be superior to constitutions and enacted legislation.
Learn more about state constitution click on the link here:
https://brainly.com/question/150922
#SPJ4
Pam just bought her first home and wants to budget for upcoming expenses. She will need money for all of the following home-related expenses EXCEPT which one?
Personal property tax
Maintenance
Heating and air conditioning
Property insurance
If Pam just bought her first home and wants to budget for upcoming expenses. She will need money for all of the following home-related expenses EXCEPT which one: C. Heating and air conditioning
What are expenses?Expenses can simply be defined as the cost incurred or money spent on items .
Home related expenses on the other hand are those expenses or expenditure incurred on the property that a person acquired.
Example of home- related expenses includes the following:
Personal property taxMaintenanceProperty insuranceTherefore the correct option is C.
Learn more about expenses here:https://brainly.com/question/14697297
#SPJ1
An investment adviser has decided to change its fee structure and will begin charging a prepaid advisory fee for new clients, but will keep its pre-existing fee structure for its existing clients. Under the requirements of the Investment Advisers Act of 1940, which statements are TRUE?
I A revised brochure must be provided to new clients
II Prompt amendment of Form ADV filed with the SEC is required
III Approval of the investment adviser's existing clients must be obtained
IV Filing with the SEC of the fee change must be completed within 30 days
I and II only
III and IV only
I and IV only
II and III only
I and II are the only options that are correct.
The Investment Advisers Act of 1940 stipulates that whenever an investment adviser changes its fee structure, it must promptly submit an amended Form ADV with the SEC (II) and distribute a new brochure to prospective customers (I).
This is done to make sure that the SEC is made aware of the change in fee structure and that new clients are fully informed about the advisory fee they will be paid.
Existing clients of the investment adviser (III) do not need to approve the fee change because it only applies to new clients. Charge changes must be made in a timely manner, not necessarily within 30 days (IV).
To learn more about Investment,
https://brainly.com/question/27717275
#SPJ4
the criminal investigative process gives too many rights to defendants and not enough power to police to solve crimes
The criminal investigative process is designed to balance the rights of defendants with the need to solve crimes and bring criminals to justice.
While some argue that the process gives too many rights to defendants, it is important to remember that these rights are put in place to protect individuals from unjust prosecution and to ensure a fair trial. For example, the right to remain silent and the right to an attorney are designed to safeguard against self-incrimination and to provide legal representation to those who may not be able to afford it. Additionally, the exclusionary rule, which prohibits the use of evidence obtained illegally, is intended to deter police misconduct and protect citizens' rights. The process also provides a variety of tools to the police, such as search and arrest warrants, and the ability to collect and analyze evidence. Overall, while the criminal investigative process may not always lead to swift justice, it is necessary to protect individual rights and maintain the integrity of the legal system.
Find more about criminal investigative process
brainly.com/question/14445589
#SPJ4
Following the armed robbery of a local bank, the police identified the defendant as a suspect and brought him to the police station for questioning. As soon as they sat down in the interrogation room, the police read the defendant his Miranda rights. The defendant noted that "this seems like the kind of thing where you should have a lawyer." The police responded that the defendant had that right. The defendant noted that he "didn't even know a good lawyer," and dropped the issue. In response to each question, the defendant simply repeated, "I don't know anything about it." Frustrated, the police discontinued questioning after an hour and left the defendant in the interrogation room alone. Three hours later, the police returned and, without repeating the Miranda warnings, told the defendant that his best friend, who was also a suspect, had already told them all about the robbery and the defendant's involvement. In fact, the police were searching for the defendant's best friend to bring him in for questioning but had not been able to locate him. The defendant immediately blurted out, "It was all his idea. I didn't even want to rob that bank."
What is the defendant's best argument that his statement was taken in violation of his Fifth Amendment rights?
The defendant did not receive fresh Miranda warnings after the break in questioning.
The defendant did not sign a written waiver of his Miranda rights.
The lie regarding his best friend's statement rendered the defendant's statement involuntary.
The police continued to question the defendant after he invoked his right to counsel.
A is the right response option. Before any questioning starts, the Miranda warnings must be read. The warnings need to be repeated if the interrogation is halted for an extended period of time. The defendant in this case might contend that after spending three hours alone in the questioning room, he was entitled to a new Miranda warning.
Answer option B is inaccurate since there is no legal necessity that a waiver of a defendant's Miranda rights must be in writing, even though it must be aware, informed, and voluntary.
Because lying about a co-confession conspirator's or engaging in other forms of interrogator deception do not by themselves constitute an involuntary confession, answer option C is false.
Answer option D is erroneous because the defendant did not express his wish for counsel to be present in a clear-cut manner, as is necessary to invoke counsel under the Fifth Amendment. The police are not compelled to stop questioning the suspect, ask more questions, or get more specific about whether they wish to exercise their right to counsel if the suspect makes a vague comment about it.
To know more about Amendment, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/12124635
#SPJ4
Based on your own subjective experience and knowledge of differences between males and females why does this happen? What are the limitations to this theory?Please be aware of stereotypes and avoid using them.
It is because of Lack of employment equality, Job segregation, Lack of legal protections, Lack of political representation etc.
What is the main cause of gender inequality?Women's ignorance of their rights and limitations on achieving equality is one of the main contributors to gender inequality. The prevalent cultural and social conventions, which state that women should be obedient to men, are frequently to blame for this lack of awareness.Inequality between men and women in education is also made worse by conflict, poverty, and other forms of socioeconomic disadvantage. For instance, there is a 2.5 times greater likelihood for girls than for boys to drop out of school in nations where there is conflict.Women's ignorance of their rights and limitations on achieving equality is one of the main contributors to gender inequality. The prevalent cultural and societal standards are frequently to blame for this lack of knowledge.Learn more about gender inequality refer to :
https://brainly.com/question/1087314
#SPJ1
the u.s. constitution does which of the following? (choose 3 answer choices)it lists the first ten statutes of the federal government.it creates three branches of government.it provides for the fundamental rights of citizens.it divides ruling authority between a state and the federal system.
The three tasks that the US Constitution does are that it creates three branches of government, it provides for the fundamental rights of citizens and it divides ruling authority between a state and the federal system.
The U.S. Federal Government is divided into three branches: the legislative, executive, and judicial.
This arrangement promotes the separation of powers. Each arm of government has its own authority and duties, including cooperating with other branches, to guarantee the efficiency of the government and the protection of citizens' rights.
The freedoms of speech, religion, the right to keep and bear arms, the right to assemble, and the right to petition are all protected by the Bill of Rights.
Additionally, it forbids compelled self-incrimination, harsh and unusual punishment, and arbitrary search and seizure.
The Constitution gives the federal government broad authority, but is limited by the 10th Amendment by the words: “[t]he powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.
To know more about US Constitution, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/17452390
#SPJ4
unions were originally formed group of answer choices to seek protection against unfair treatment. to uphold the state and federal laws under which businesses operate. to seek worker corporate voting rights, the same as stockholders. to make certain that there were an equal number of nonmanagement and management-level employees within the company.
Labor unions date back to the eighteenth century and Europe's industrial revolution. During this time, there was a significant influx of new workers into the workplace who required representation.
From the Industrial Revolution to the Present:
Labor unions date back to the eighteenth century and Europe's industrial revolution. During this time, there was a significant influx of new workers into the workplace who required representation.
Early workers and trade unions played an important role in the role for independence in the history of unions in the United States. Although their physical efforts for independence were futile, the ideas they introduced, such as worker protection, became part of our American culture.
The Most Well-Known Labor Union in History
The most famous trade and labor union in American history is the American Federation of Labor (AFL), founded in 1886 by Samuel Gompers. At its The AFL had approximately 1.4 million members at its peak. The American Federation of Labor is credited with successfully negotiating wage increases for its members and improving workplace safety for all workers.
During World War II, the Congress of Industrial Organizations (CIO) led by John L. Lewis and the larger AFL federation expanded dramatically. The AFL-CIO union was formed in 1955.
Around 1970, union membership and power peaked. Union membership in the private sector began a steady decline at that time, which continues to this day. However, membership in public sector unions is steadily increasing.
According to the Department of Labor, the 2015 union membership rate was 11.1%, with 14.8 million workers belonging to unions.
Learn more about Labor Union from here;
https://brainly.com/question/29738343
#SPJ4
Historians have argued that race and gender were important in Roosevelt's and other's justifications for imperialism because these imperialists
a. claimed American society had lost touch with manly virtues.
b. saw the nation as becoming soft and feminine since the frontier closed.
c. perceived other nations as at the bottom of a strict racial hierarchy.
d. regarded blacks as primitive and Anglo-Saxons as civilized.
e. All of these
Historians have argued that race and gender played important roles in Roosevelt's and other's justifications for imperialism.
They claim that American imperialists saw the nation as becoming soft and feminine due to the closing of the frontier, and that they regarded other nations as being at the bottom of a strict racial hierarchy. They also believed that blacks were primitive and Anglo-Saxons were civilized. All of these factors contributed to the justification of imperialism. Other's justifications for imperialism were because these imperialists saw the nation as becoming soft and feminine since the frontier closed. They viewed other nations as at the bottom of a strict racial hierarchy, with blacks being perceived as primitive and Anglo-Saxons as civilized. These perceptions led to a belief that American society had lost touch with manly virtues, which was used to justify imperialist policies.
Learn more about Roosevelt here
https://brainly.com/question/29797674
#SPJ4
____: services designed by federal law whose purpose is to assist a student with exceptionalities in deriving benefits from a special education.
Special education services are designed by federal law to help students with exceptionalities in obtaining the most out of their educational opportunities.
These services provide a range of support and resources to ensure that students are able to access and benefit from their educational experiences, as well as to accommodate their individual needs and abilities. By providing such services, students with exceptionalities can access the same educational opportunities as their peers, thus allowing them to reach their full potential. Special education services are a crucial part of the educational system, providing support to those with learning disabilities or other special needs. These services focus on helping those with special needs to reach their maximum potential by creating individualized programs and providing necessary accommodations. Special education services are available for children from birth to 21 years of age, and encompass a wide range of areas such as speech-language pathology, physical therapy, occupational therapy, and behavioral intervention. Furthermore, teachers and support staff work together to create an environment in which students with special needs can experience success both academically and socially. Overall, special education services strive to ensure that all children have the opportunity to reach their full potential.
Learn more about Special education services here
https://brainly.com/question/14674113
#SPJ4
assume the united states government significantly increases deficit spending relative to other countries. which of the following would happen to the u.s. dollar in the foreign exchange markets because of the change in the interest rate, ceteris paribus?
An increase in deficit spending by the United States government relative to other countries would likely lead to an increase in the supply of U.S. dollars in the foreign exchange market, ceteris paribus.
This increase in supply would put downward pressure on the value of the dollar relative to other currencies. Additionally, when the government increases deficit spending, it typically leads to an increase in inflation and interest rates. This would also put downward pressure on the value of the dollar in the foreign exchange market. Higher interest rates tend to attract foreign investors, which increases the demand for domestic currency, but in this case, the increase in the supply of U.S. dollars would be greater than the increase in demand. Therefore, the U.S. dollar would likely depreciate in the foreign exchange market due to the increase in deficit spending and interest rates relative to other countries.
Find out more about Government
brainly.com/question/22432515
#SPJ4
If your wheels drift onto the shoulder of the road and you want to return to the paved road, you should
a. drive along the shoulder to the acceleration lane
b. drive along the should until you are going as fast as the traffic on the road
c. slow down and slightly turn the steering wheel towards the roadway
d. move slowly along the shoulder and wave traffic
If the wheels drift then one should slow down and slightly turn the steering wheel towards the roadway
A wheel drift occurs when the front tyres are also sliding due to understeer, in addition to the rear wheels losing grip in a slide. It's crucial to slow down and use caution if the driver's wheels stray into the road shoulder and the driver wishes to get back onto the paved road.
One suggested approach to get back on the paved road is to turn the steering wheel just a little bit in the direction of the road while continuing to drive slowly. This will assist in getting the driver's car's wheels back on the pavement. To guarantee the safety of other drivers, it's also critical to check the mirrors and signal before getting back on the road.
Read more about wheel drift on:
https://brainly.com/question/29761557
#SPJ4
The Department of Financial Services has the authority to perform all of the following duties, except:
A Determine solvency of an insurer
B Conduct an investigation regarding alleged improper conduct of a person regulated by the Department
C Supervise agent licensing
D Require a licensing applicant's fingerprints to be checked by local and federal law enforcement agencies
The Department of Financial Services (DFS) has the authority to perform several duties related to the regulation of financial institutions and individuals within the industry. These include:
A Determine solvency of an insurer: DFS has the authority to evaluate the financial stability of insurance companies to ensure they have enough assets to pay claims.
B Conduct an investigation regarding alleged improper conduct of a person regulated by the Department: DFS can investigate any alleged violations of laws and regulations by individuals or entities regulated by the department.
C Supervise agent licensing: DFS is responsible for issuing, renewing and supervising licenses for agents and other individuals working in the insurance industry.
However, the Department of Financial Services does not have the authority to "Require a licensing applicant's fingerprints to be checked by local and federal law enforcement agencies" as this is typically the responsibility of the law enforcement agencies rather than the financial regulatory body. This is the correct answer among the given options.
Find more about Department of Financial Services
brainly.com/question/30113157
#SPJ4
Question:-What is the exception among the duties of the Department of Financial Services?
the act of giving government jobs to political supporters is called
The act of giving government jobs to political supporters is called Political patronage.
Patronage refers to the assistance that a group, person, or organization gives to another, including financial support. Arts patronage, which has been used to describe various forms of financial assistance to artists including musicians, painters, and sculptors by kings, popes, and the affluent, is a term used in the history of art. Other examples include the authority to grant offices or ecclesiastical benefices, the patronage of saints, and the business given to a firm by a dependable customer. Latin patronus ("patron"), meaning "one who benefits his clientele," is where the word "patron" originates (see Patronage in ancient Rome). In some nations, the phrase is used to denote political patronage or patronal politics, which is the practice of using public funds to reward people for their election support.
Learn more about Political patronage here
https://brainly.com/question/29870571
#SPJ4
a court will grant a motion for judgment on the pleadings in favor of the moving party if the following three conditions are met: .
It is vital that any relief provided in a civil lawsuit be done so exclusively in light of the pleadings' requests.
Order 6 Rule 17 of the Code of Civil Procedure contains a provision for amending pleadings. The court will only permit revision, though, if it is necessary to resolve the dispute between the parties. This clause does not aim to subvert the law; rather, it advances objectives of justice.
A petition cannot be submitted before to the election for the returned candidate, but it may be submitted by any candidate who ran in the election, by any elector within 45 days of the election for the returned .
Learn more about pleadings.
https://brainly.com/question/28541460
#SPJ4
which of the following are grounds for relief from judgment for which a motion must be made within a reasonable time not to exceed one
The court may relieve a party or his legal representative from a final judgement, order, or proceeding on motion and on just terms for the following reasons: (1) mistake, inadvertence, surprise, or excusable neglect; (2) newly discovered evidence that could not have been discovered in time to move for a new trial under Rule 59; (b),
According to the second paragraph of the 1973 Reporter's Notes to Rule 60, "...[B]because a Rule 60(b) motion does not affect the finality of the judgement, it does not toll the time for taking an appeal." However, in 2013, an amendment to Rule 4(a) of the Massachusetts Rules of Appellate Procedure provided that a Rule 60 motion filed within ten days of the entry of judgement tolled the time period for filing an appeal.
The 2013 amendment to Mass. R. A. P. 4(a) was intended to address the ambiguity that occasionally occurred when a post-judgment motion, known as a motion for "reconsideration," was served within ten days of the entry of judgement.
Because the Massachusetts Rules of Civil Procedure do not mention motions for summary judgement, "...[B]ecause a Rule 60(b) motion does not affect the finality of the judgement, it does not toll the time for taking an appeal," according to the second paragraph of the 1973 Reporter's Notes to Rule 60.
However, an amendment to Rule 4(a) of the Massachusetts Rules of Appellate Procedure in 2013 provided that a Rule 60 motion filed within ten days of the entry of judgement tolled the time limit for filing an appeal.
The 2013 amendment to Mass. R. A. P. 4(a) was intended to address ambiguity that sometimes occurred when a post-judgment motion, known as a motion for "reconsideration," was served within ten days of the entry of judgement. Because summary judgement motions are not mentioned in the Massachusetts Rules of Civil Procedure,
Learn more about post-judgment from here ;
https://brainly.com/question/29223053
#SPJ4
Complete Question:
Which of the following are grounds for relief from judgment for which a motion must be made within a reasonable time not to exceed one
(1) mistake, inadvertence, surprise, or excusable neglect;
(2) newly discovered evidence that, with reasonable diligence, could not have been discovered in time to move for a new trial under Rule 59(b);
(3) fraud (whether previously called intrinsic or extrinsic), misrepresentation, or misconduct by an opposing party.
(4) the judgment is void.
List and then discuss the reasons Chambliss gives for why vagrancy laws became increasingly punitive overtime?
In the past, it was against the law for someone to stray from one location to another without obvious support for why vagrancy laws became increasingly punitive overtime.
What are vagrancy laws?The state of being homeless without a regular source of money or job is known as vagrancy. Typically, vagrants depend on begging, scavenging, small thievery, temporary employment, or social security to make ends meet.
Vagrancy was formerly punished by the state with forced work, military service, incarceration, or confinement to special labor houses and was linked to minor crime, begging, and lawlessness.
The Latin word vagari, which means "to roam," is the ultimate source of the words vagrant and vagabond. Latin vagabundus is where the word "vagabond" comes from.
A vagabond was originally someone without a place to live or a job in Middle English. Many world religions contain references to or practices involving vagrants, both historically and currently.
Learn more about vagrancy laws, here
https://brainly.com/question/8099516
#SPJ1
if a congressman introduces a bill and it does not pass before the end of the congressional session, is that the old dead
In a typical congressional session, 10,000 legislations are introduced, and about 85% of those bills are killed in committee.
In committee or subcommittee, where they may be categorized, overlooked, or never debated, about 85% of proposals are killed. If a measure is approved, committee members will have the chance to hear from a range of experts, politicians, or lobbyists. The Conference Committee has a representation from each of the legislative bodies. One person from each of the two major political parties is sent to each chamber. The four members make an effort to settle disagreements among the chambers. The bill expires if no agreement is reached. Between 2017 and 2019, the 115th Congress passed 443 of more than 10,000 bills. And as a result, only 4.5% of the proposed laws at that time were really passed.
Learn more about The Conference Committee here:
https://brainly.com/question/28204672
#SPJ4
A representative democracy is a form of government in which. public decisions are made by leaders elected by the citizens to vote according to their interests. Which kind of government did the American colonists create when they formed the United States of America?
The American colonists create when they formed the United States of America is constitutional democracy.
The majority's power is constrained under a CONSTITUTIONAL DEMOCRACY by institutional and legal safeguards that uphold the rights of individuals and minorities. In Germany, Israel, Japan, the United States, and other nations, this kind of democracy is practised. The term "constitutional" describes the fact that the Constitution, which serves as the ultimate law of the United States, serves as the foundation for the country's governance. Examples of constitutional governments include the United States, the First French Republic, the Weimar Republic, and (usually) England.
Learn more about constitutional democracy here
https://brainly.com/question/19552221
#SPJ4
Which kind of government did the American colonists create when they formed the United States of America?
according to contemporary functionalists, which of the following is not one of the four main functions of government? group of answer choices planning and directing society handling international relations, including warfare ensuring positive interactions between political cliques maintaining law and order
According to contemporary functionalists, ensuring positive interactions between political cliques is not one of the four main functions of government.
Thus the correct answer is option C.
The four important functions of the government as per the contemporary functionalists are planning and directing society handling international relations, including warfare. maintaining law and order and meeting social needs.
Politics and the government are seen as tools by functionalists for enforcing rules and controlling conflict.
Active social change, is seen negatively by functionalists since it drives change and may have unfavourable side effects that may need to be made up for.
Functionalists favour social harmony and order. Societal challenges brought on by dysfunction encourage social reform.
For instance, functionalists would view financial contributions to political campaigns as a tool to keep citizens engaged with the democratic process.
To know more about functionalists click here:
https://brainly.com/question/7787153
#SPJ4
a public policy reason for why courts and legislators have supported imposing strict product liability is that consumers should be protected against unsafe products.
The given statement, "A public policy is the reason for why courts and legislators have supported imposing strict product liability which is consumers should be protected against unsafe products." is true because of product liability.
Courts and legislators have supported imposing strict product liability as a public policy reason because consumers should be protected against unsafe products. Product liability is a legal term that refers to the responsibility of manufacturers, distributors, and retailers to ensure that their products are safe for consumers to use.
Product liability claims can arise when a consumer is injured or experiences a loss due to a defect in the product, or when a product does not perform as advertised. In these cases, the manufacturer, distributor, or retailer may be held liable for any damages or losses suffered by the consumer.
----------The given question is incomplete, the complete question is:
"A public policy is the reason for why courts and legislators have supported imposing strict product liability which is consumers should be protected against unsafe products. (True or False)."--------
To know more about public policy, click here.
https://brainly.com/question/30137681
#SPJ4
after reviewing data on a number of stimulus projects that are underway, a senator decides which ones she will vote to defund because they do not meet her standards.
After reviewing data on a number of stimulus projects that are underway, a senator decides which ones she will vote to defund because they do not meet her standards, so this process is decisional and could be referred to as Decision Making Process.
The correct option is D.
Recognizing the issue, learning about potential solutions, and selecting the best option are the steps in the decision-making process.
Making a decision between two or more possibilities is the process of decision making in management. In order to attain a desired result, this entails weighing the benefits and drawbacks of many options and selecting the optimal alternative.
Making decisions in management involves taking actions that advance the goals and objectives of the company.
Either an intuitive or logical procedure, or a combination of the two, is used to carry out this process. Using your gut instinct to decide on the best course of action is the essence of intuition. In contrast, a logical process makes decisions that are consistent with science by using data and facts.
The question is incomplete. The complete question is:
After reviewing data on a number of stimulus projects that are underway, a senator decides which ones she will vote to defund because they do not meet her standards. This process is called:
A. planning
B. Controlling
C. Organsing
D Decision Making Process.
To know more about the principles of management. click here:
https://brainly.com/question/29037243
#SPJ4
Under this act, how many days do you have to dispute a charge on your credit card?
Consumers have 60 days to challenge a charge with a card issuer after receiving their credit card statement. Calculation errors must be present for charges to be subject to challenge if they exceed $50.
Consumers are individuals or groups who do not actively engage in commercial or entrepreneurial activities but who plan to order or utilize acquired goods, services, or experiences primarily for their own social, familial, or household purposes. The expression is most usually used to refer to someone who makes purchases for their own use. Consumption is the act of consuming an item or service. Consumer and client are commonly used interchangeably. This is just partly accurate. A customer is a person or company who makes purchases of goods or services. They were either edible or not.
Learn more about Consumers here
https://brainly.com/question/380037
#SPJ4
which amendment laid the foundation for the process of extending the protections within the bill of rights to the states?
After the Fourteenth Amendment was ratified, the Supreme Court determined through a series of cases that the Due Process provision of the Fourteenth amendment included extending certain Bill of Rights protections to States.
No State may pass or enforce any laws that limit the privileges or rights of US citizens, and no State may take away anyone's life, liberty, or property without due process. No State should refuse anybody living under its authority the equal protection of the law without first ensuring they receive a fair trial. Anyone who was born in the United States or who later became a citizen of the nation was given citizenship as well as equal civil and legal rights under the United States Constitution's Fourteenth Amendment. Slaves who had been set free after the American Civil War and African Americans were also included in this.
Learn more about Fourteenth Amendment here
https://brainly.com/question/7570923
#SPJ4
those who disagree with the views in the majority opinion in schenck v. united states would likely celebrate the shaping of the constitution in which free-speech ruling? responses new york times co v. united states new york times co v. united states tinker v. des moines tinker v. des moines united states v. lopez united states v. lopez engel v. vitale
Those who disagree with the views in the majority opinion in schenck v. united states would likely celebrate the shaping of the constitution in the free-speech ruling held in the case of New York Times Company v. United States.
In 1971, the Nixon administration made an effort to prevent the publishing of a top-secret history of US military involvement in Vietnam under the pretext that doing so would jeopardise national security.
The case of New York Times Company v. United States was very instrumental in deciding on the question as to whether such an act of prohibiting the publish of material was constitutional valid or not.
The US government had not fulfilled "the onerous burden of proving grounds for the enforcement," the Court said in a 6-3 judgement. The court ruled that the publication bans must stop right away.
Even in circumstances concerning national security, the Court created a "strong presumption against prior restraint" in this decision. This indicates that instances of governmental censorship are quite likely to be deemed unconstitutional by the Court.
To know more about New York Times Company v. United States, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/29851642?referrer=searchResults
#SPJ4