Answer:
The Vietnam War was a war of decolonization because it was a fight between the Vietnamese people and foreign colonial powers to gain independence for Vietnam. Vietnam was ruled by France for most of the 20th century. France was a colonial power that took control of the country by force and coercion. Around the middle of the 20th century, Vietnamese nationalist groups began to form. They wanted to get rid of French colonial rule and make Vietnam a free country.
The Vietnamese finally beat the French in 1954, but the country was then split into two separate states: North Vietnam, which was run by a communist government, and South Vietnam, which was run by a non-communist government backed by the United States. The United States helped the government of South Vietnam fight the communist forces of North Vietnam, which led to the Vietnam War.
So, the Vietnam War can be seen as a war of decolonization because it was a fight for independence by the Vietnamese people from France and then the United States, which were colonial powers at the time. The war was part of a larger wave of decolonization movements that happened all over the world in the 20th century. During these movements, many countries in Asia, Africa, and Latin America tried to get rid of European powers' control over them.
Answer:
False.
Explanation:
There is a difference between the Indochina Wars and the Vietnam War. The Vietnam War, which was fought between North Vietnam and South Vietnam, is not a war of decolonization, though North Vietnam may argue that it is so. The war of decolonization has already been fought in the Indochina Wars, in which Vietnam defeated France and her allies (primarily the United States).
Now, you may ask, what the Vietnam War was primarily about? The Vietnam War, on the other hand, primarily was fighting to unite Vietnam under a common government (whether the communist regime of North Vietnam under H-o Chi Minh, or the parliamentary republic of South Vietnam under Ngo Dinh Diem.
Learn more about the Vietnam War, here:
https://brainly.com/question/11375126
In 2005, world leaders formally adopted the Responsibility to Protect [R2P]—the duty to intervene in when national governments fail to fulfill their responsibility to protect their citizens from atrocious crimes—and in 2006 the UN Security Council passed Resolution 1674, which commits the Council to protect civilians during armed conflicts. Do you agree that under certain circumstances, R2P should override sovereignty? Can you cite any examples where R2P has been or should be implemented?
Answer:
the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) principle acknowledges that states have a responsibility to protect their populations from mass atrocities, such as genocide, war crimes, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity. It also recognizes that when states fail to fulfill this responsibility, the international community has a responsibility to intervene to protect the affected populations.
Regarding the question of whether R2P should override sovereignty, it is a controversial issue. On the one hand, some argue that sovereignty should be respected as a fundamental principle of international law, and that any intervention in a country's affairs without its consent is a violation of its sovereignty. On the other hand, others argue that sovereignty should not be an absolute principle, and that the international community has a responsibility to act when states commit atrocities against their own people.
There have been several instances where the R2P principle has been invoked, including in Kosovo in 1999, Libya in 2011, and Syria in 2013. In Kosovo, NATO intervened without UN Security Council authorization, leading to a debate about the legitimacy of the intervention. In Libya, the UN Security Council authorized a military intervention to protect civilians, leading to the ousting of the Gaddafi regime. In Syria, the international community has been criticized for its failure to take more robust action to protect civilians during the ongoing conflict.
In conclusion, the implementation of the R2P principle is a complex issue, and whether it should override sovereignty is a matter of debate. While there have been instances where R2P has been invoked, its application remains controversial, and the international community continues to grapple with how best to respond to mass atrocities.
Explanation:
What may be the oldest civilization in the Americas was developed by a people known as the what
Why did the US help France to defeat the Vietminh?
Answer:
Explanation:
Containment of communism: At the time, the US was engaged in the Cold War with the Soviet Union, and there was a fear that the spread of communism would destabilize other countries and regions. The US viewed Vietnam as a critical battleground in the fight against communism and saw supporting France as a way to contain the spread of communism in Southeast Asia.
Economic interests: The US had economic interests in the region, including access to raw materials and markets for American goods. Supporting France in the conflict was a way to maintain these economic interests.
Alliance with France: The US had a long-standing alliance with France, which dates back to the American Revolution. Supporting France in the conflict was a way to strengthen this alliance.
Ideological reasons: Many US policymakers believed that the Vietnamese would be better off under French colonial rule than
communist rule. This belief was based on a view of communism as a totalitarian ideology that would lead to oppression and the suppression of individual freedoms.
The Executive Branch—How have the powers of the Executive Branch changed since the writing of the Constitution? What was the stance of both the Federalists and Anti-Federalists at that time? Create an argument for the position of the Federalists and Anti-Federalists regarding the modern-day Executive Branch. Your argument should reference specific amendments, legal cases, or precedents to support it.
Answer:
The powers of the Executive Branch have significantly expanded since the writing of the Constitution. In the early days of the United States, the President's powers were limited to executing the laws passed by Congress and serving as the Commander-in-Chief of the military. However, over time, the Executive Branch's role and powers have grown to include implementing and enforcing regulations, managing the nation's foreign affairs, and having a significant role in the budgeting process.
The Federalists, who supported a strong centralized government, favored a powerful Executive Branch. They believed that a strong Executive was necessary to ensure that the laws passed by Congress were implemented effectively and to maintain order and stability in the country. They argued that the President needed to be able to act quickly and decisively in times of crisis, without being tied down by the constraints of the legislative branch.
On the other hand, the Anti-Federalists, who were wary of centralized power and favored stronger state governments, were skeptical of a powerful Executive Branch. They feared that a strong President could become tyrannical and usurp the powers of the other branches of government, leading to a loss of individual liberties.
In modern times, the powers of the Executive Branch have continued to expand. Some argue that this expansion has been necessary to address the increasingly complex and interconnected issues facing the country, while others argue that it has led to an imbalance of power that threatens individual rights and liberties.
The Federalists would likely argue that the expansion of Executive power has been necessary to address the challenges of modern governance. They might point to the Supreme Court case of United States v. Curtiss-Wright Export Corp. (1936), in which the Court upheld the President's power to take executive action in matters of foreign policy. They might also cite the War Powers Resolution (1973), which provides a framework for the President to use military force, as an example of the necessary expansion of Executive power.
The Anti-Federalists, however, would likely argue that the expansion of Executive power has led to a dangerous concentration of power in the hands of the President. They might point to the recent use of executive orders to bypass Congress and implement policies unilaterally as an example of this concentration of power. They might also cite the Fourth Amendment's protection against unreasonable searches and seizures and argue that the government's surveillance programs, which have been implemented by the Executive Branch, violate this protection.
Overall, the debate over the modern-day Executive Branch is a complex one, and there are valid arguments to be made from both the Federalist and Anti-Federalist perspectives. However, it is clear that the role and powers of the Executive Branch have evolved significantly since the writing of the Constitution, and this evolution will likely continue as the country faces new and increasingly complex challenges.
Explanation:
Answer: The powers of the Executive Branch have significantly expanded since the writing of the Constitution. At the time of the Constitution's drafting, the role of the president was limited to primarily enforcing laws passed by Congress and serving as the commander-in-chief of the armed forces. The Federalists believed in a strong executive branch, arguing that a single, powerful executive would ensure stability and provide protection against foreign threats. On the other hand, the Anti-Federalists were concerned about the potential for tyranny, and advocated for a weaker executive branch with more limited powers.
Over time, the Executive Branch has gained significant powers, particularly in the areas of foreign policy, national security, and economic regulation. For example, since World War II, the president has become the de facto leader of American foreign policy, with the ability to enter into treaties and engage in military conflicts without Congressional approval. Additionally, the president now has significant authority over the economy, including the ability to issue executive orders and direct regulatory agencies.
Given these changes, the Federalists would likely support the modern-day Executive Branch and its expanded powers. They would argue that a strong executive is necessary to protect American interests and ensure stability in a complex world. The Anti-Federalists, however, would likely be wary of the modern-day Executive Branch and its potential for abuse. They would argue that the expanded powers of the presidency undermine the separation of powers and increase the risk of tyranny.
One key legal case that highlights the debate over the powers of the Executive Branch is Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. Sawyer (1952). In this case, President Truman attempted to seize control of steel mills during the Korean War in order to prevent a labor strike. The Supreme Court ruled that the president did not have the authority to take such action without Congressional approval, citing the separation of powers outlined in the Constitution. This decision supports the Anti-Federalist view that the president's powers should be limited and subject to checks and balances.
Enjoy!
The meeting point of north and south poles is called
The meeting point of the North Pole and South Pole is called the geographic South Pole .
What is the meeting point of north and south poles?It is located at the southern most point on the Earth's surface and is located on the continent of Antarctica. Similarly, the geographic North Pole is the northernmost point on the Earth's surface and is located in the Arctic Ocean.
The Geographic South Pole is located in Antarctica, while the Geographic North Pole is located in the Arctic Ocean. These points are the points of intersection of the Earth's rotational axis with its surface.
Learn more about south pole here:https://brainly.com/question/29026330
#SPJ1
Under the Fourteenth Amendment, anyone who was
citizenship and entitled to equal protection under the law.
OA. born in the United States
B. not born enslaved
OC. male and of voting age
D. willing to pledge their allegiance
would be grante
Answer:
A. born in the United States
Explanation:
including CORPORATIONS !!! by the Supreme Court
giving CORPORATIONS many of the same rights as people
CORPORATIONS could now
1. spend money on political campaigns
2. lobby lawmakers like people
3. do a lawsuit
4. be sued
5. enter into contracts
6. protect itself against unfair government actions
chatgpt
historycom
__ is not a state capital in New England.
Boston
Sacramento
Providence
Answer:
Boston
Explanation:
Answer:
Sacramento
Explanation:
The region of New England consists of six states: Connecticut, Maine, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, Rhode Island, and Vermont. Boston is the state capital of Massachusetts, and Providence is the state capital of Rhode Island. Based on this, we can deduct that Sacramento is not a capital found in New England. (P.S. Sacramento is the capital of California.)
How has legislation evolved in the field of child welfare?
In your opinion, what is the most significant piece of legislation for children and families to date and why?
What are some jobs that work with children and families and what is the level of education that is primarily needed?
The Child Abuse Treatment and Prevention Act (CAPTA) of 1974 is the key piece of law protecting kids and families to date.
Which of the above would aid in stopping child abuse?Supporting parents, imparting good parenting techniques, and strengthening the legislation to outlaw corporal punishment are all examples of effective preventative strategies. Continuous support for kids and families can lessen the likelihood that abuse will happen again and also lessen its effects.
What is the penalty for mistreating a child?12 to 20 years of prison with a penalty between Rigorous imprisonment to P500,000 for just a person who'd maintain in his society a youngster below 12 years old, but is ten years more than his senior in any private or public location - provided the culprit is not connected to the kid inside the 4th degree or consanguinity.
To know more about Child Abuse Prevention visit:
https://brainly.com/question/28500534
#SPJ1
a dolphin is not a fish though it lives in water and swims like a fish. why?
Explanation:
A dolphin is not a fish but is a mammal. Dolphins share many similarities with fish, including living in water and having streamlined bodies that help them swim efficiently. However, dolphins are warm-blooded and breathe air through lungs, unlike fish which are cold-blooded and breathe through gills. Additionally, dolphins nurse their young with milk and have hair on their bodies, which are both characteristics of mammals. Therefore, even though dolphins may appear similar to fish, they are a distinct type of animal with unique characteristics and traits that classify them as mammals rather than fish.
How did Upton Sinclair's The Jungle directly contribute to the passage of reforms in 1906?
A. It investigated the corrupt practices and worker abuses of oil
trusts.
B. It reported the employment of children in mines and factories.
C. It exposed overcrowding and poverty in tenements.
D. It drew attention to unsanitary conditions in the meatpacking
industry.
D. Called attention to unsanitary conditions in the meat industry.
His Upton Sinclair novel The Jungle, published in 1906, revealed the appallingly unsanitary conditions of the meat processing industry.
The novel details how meat is often contaminated with rat droppings, sawdust, and other unsanitary substances, and how workers are forced to work in dangerous conditions. The book caused a public outcry and led to the passage of the Pure Food and Drug Act of 1906 and the Meat Inspection Act. The Pure Food and Drug Act is the first federal law regulating food and drugs in the United States. It urged food and drug manufacturers to label their products accurately and truthfully, and prohibited the sale of mislabeled or adulterated food and drug products. The Meat Inspection Act of 1906 required the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) to inspect all meat sold across state lines to ensure it was safe for human consumption. In short, Upton Sinclair's The Jungle contributed directly to the passage of the reforms of 1906, exposing the unsanitary conditions of the meat processing industry and ensuring food and drug safety and regulation of the meat processing industry. led to the passage of two major laws aimed at.
For more information on adulterated see:
https://brainly.com/question/28615248
#SPJ1
There are eight New England states.
TrueFalse
Answer: TRUE
Explanation:
Answer:
statement is True ...
thank you!!!!
In which state did fighting break out after the government sided with the South and Union supporters set up their own state government?
1. Missouri
2. Tennessee
3. Delaware
4. Kentucky
West Virginia - When the state of Virginia left the Union, West Virginia broke away and became its own state.
Which state did fighting South and Union supporters set up their own state government?
Six more states—Mississippi, Florida, Alabama, Georgia, Louisiana, and Texas—separated after South Carolina, and four more—Virginia, Arkansas, Tennessee, and North Carolina—threatened to do the same. The Confederate States of America eventually emerged from these eleven states.
South Carolina announced its secession from the United States of America on December 20, 1860. Ten more southern states would leave the Union in the following six months: 9 January 1861 in Mississippi. 10 January 1861, Florida. Texas, Arkansas, Louisiana, Tennessee, Mississippi, Alabama, Georgia, Florida, South Carolina, North Carolina, and Virginia were all members of the Confederacy. The Confederate Congress gave the go-ahead to recruit 400,000 recruits on May 16. On May 20, 1861, North Carolina became the final state to ratify the treaty.
Learn more about government:
https://brainly.com/question/16940043
#SPJ1
simplified Answer: Tennessee
HELP QUICKLY PLEASE! 10+ POINTS!
Explain Berkeley's argument against abstract ideas. What are the implications for the
primary/secondary
distinction that Locke made?
Answer:
Berkeley's argument against abstract ideas is based on his belief that all knowledge comes through sensory experience. He argues that since abstract ideas do not have any corresponding sensory experience, they cannot be real. In other words, according to Berkeley, we can only know what we perceive through our senses, and anything that is not directly perceived does not exist.
Berkeley believes that abstract ideas are merely mental constructions that we create by combining and abstracting from our sensory experiences. He argues that concepts such as "redness" or "justice" are not real things that exist independently in the world, but rather they are mental abstractions that we create by combining and abstracting from our sensory experiences of particular instances of red objects or just actions.
This argument has important implications for the primary/secondary distinction that Locke made. According to Locke, primary qualities such as size, shape, and motion are objective qualities that exist independently in the external world and are perceived directly by our senses. In contrast, secondary qualities such as color, taste, and smell are subjective qualities that exist only in the mind and are caused by the interaction between primary qualities and our sensory organs.
However, Berkeley's argument against abstract ideas undermines the primary/secondary distinction because it denies the existence of objective qualities that can be perceived independently of our sensory experiences. For Berkeley, all qualities are subjective and exist only in the mind as mental constructions created by our sensory experiences. Therefore, there is no objective reality that exists independently of our perceptions.
Explanation:
What did the stigma for american women during the industrial revolution do?
Answer: The Industrial Revolution impacted different social classes of women in numerous ways. Throughout this time period, the working class citizens were most significantly impacted. Many women who did not belong to wealthy families would often be forced to enter the workforce just to provide enough for their families to live off of. A woman named Mrs. Britton explains her journey through a testimony she gave looking back on her experience working during the Industrial Revolution in 1842. From ages 10 to 26 Mrs. Britton worked in a factory in Calne. Following her work in the factory, she would marry a working man of several occupations and have seven children with him. Her husband would earn around 10s per week while working his jobs. To provide for such a large family, Mrs. Britton was also forced to enter the workforce. She and a few of her older children begin working in the fields and would harvest hay. Her sons would make around 9s per day and she would make around 10s per day. These were very small wages, even though 10s per day is above the average for a woman at this time. Mrs. Britton would struggle between caring for the children while also holding down a full time job. Although this lifestyle was very difficult for Mrs. Britton, she admits that she would much more prefer working in the field than working in the factory again.
Explanation:
True or False: the last king of Rome was Servius Tullius.
Answer:
false
Tarquin was the last king of rome who died in 495 BC
Answer:
False
Explanation:
I believe he had a sucessor called Tarquinius Superbus, meaning he was not the last king of Rome.
Brainliest?
"Southerners like Bouldin often rooted authority in unredeemed force and contaminated inheritance. Whites must take Indian land, Bouldin suggested, but the process was contaminated at the core". Read and interpret this passage in the context of the whole Introduction. Is Rogin, and by extension Bouldin and the others, discussing something like fate? How did these settlers understand their "fate," and how has it shaped the American character, according to Rogin?
Please need help with this!
Answer:
The passage you provided is taken from the book "Ronald Reagan, The Movie and Other Episodes in Political Demonology" by Michael Rogin, which explores the relationship between American politics and popular culture. In the book's introduction, Rogin discusses the historical and cultural roots of American political mythology, arguing that the American character has been shaped by a series of "political demonologies" that are rooted in a sense of "contaminated inheritance" and a belief in the inevitability of violent conflict.
The passage you provided specifically refers to the views of "Southerners like Bouldin," who Rogin suggests were among the many settlers who believed in the "unredeemed force" of white authority and the necessity of taking Native American land. These settlers, according to Rogin, understood their fate as being tied to a larger historical and cultural process of conquest and domination. They believed that the expansion of American power and the subjugation of other peoples was both necessary and inevitable.
Rogin's argument is that this sense of fate and inevitability has shaped the American character in profound ways. He suggests that Americans have long seen themselves as a chosen people, destined for greatness and willing to use whatever means necessary to achieve it. This belief in the righteousness of American power has led to a series of "political demonologies" that have justified everything from slavery and imperialism to the use of nuclear weapons.
Explanation:
In summary, Rogin is arguing that the views of people like Bouldin and other settlers, who saw themselves as destined to conquer and dominate, helped to shape the American character and create a mythology of American exceptionalism that continues to influence American politics and culture today.
The leader of a post classical north African kingdom would like to ensure that his people continue to practice their traditional religion and never convert to Islam which of these actions would best help him achieve this goal
Cutting off commerce with the Umay-yad Empire would be the best course of action for the ruler of a post-classical North African country to take in order to accomplish this goal.
What period of history was the first Mu-slim Empire?It was the first significant Mu-slim dynasty, ruling from 661 to 750. This dynasty was founded by Muwi-yah I, who overcame the Prop-het's son-in-law Al to become the fifth caliph. With the help of the Sy-rian army, he expanded the borders of the Arab empire.
After Prophet's passing, four important dynasties were established. The greatest way to achieve the goal of never converting to Is-lam is to quit doing business with the second major Empire.
What notable changes in society, government, and economy did the Abbasid and Umay-yad caliphates bring about?By relocating the capital to Baghdad in 762 CE, the Abbasids assisted the mawali, or non-Arab Mu-slims, in overthrowing the Uma-yyad dynasty in 750 CE. The Abbasids created the professions of vizier and emir to represent their central government, progressively replacing the traditional Arab aristocracy with the Persian bureaucracy.
Learn more about Umay-yad Empire: https://brainly.com/question/21077978
#SPJ9
In what ways were Darwin's ideas about evolution read by his Arabic readers in relation to social and cultural issues in the age of imperialism?
What influence did the Islamic religious context play in the first translations of Darwin's works into Arabic?
During the age of imperialism, Darwin's ideas about evolution were read by his Arabic readers in various ways, often in relation to social and cultural issues. The reception of Darwin's ideas in the Arab world was complex and multifaceted, as different readers engaged with his works from different perspectives. The influence of the Islamic religious context on the first translations of Darwin's works into Arabic also played a significant role.
Relation to social and cultural issues:
a. Modernity and progress: Darwin's ideas were seen as a symbol of modernity and progress, as Arab societies were trying to catch up with the West. The theory of evolution represented scientific advancement, and embracing it was seen as a way to promote progress and development in the Arab world.
b. Nationalism and resistance: Some Arab intellectuals and political leaders used Darwin's ideas as a tool to resist colonial domination and to challenge the Western powers' claims of cultural superiority. They argued that Arabs were part of the same evolutionary process, and thus not inherently inferior to their European counterparts.
c. Social Darwinism: Darwin's ideas about evolution were sometimes misinterpreted or misused to justify certain social and political ideologies. For instance, Social Darwinism, which applied the concept of "survival of the fittest" to societies and nations, was sometimes used to justify racist and imperialist policies in the Arab world.
Influence of the Islamic religious context:
a. Compatibility with Islam: Some Muslim scholars and intellectuals argued that Darwin's ideas were compatible with Islamic teachings. They pointed to the Quranic verses that highlight the gradual development of life and suggested that evolution could be seen as part of God's plan. These scholars often provided their interpretations to reconcile the Islamic worldview with Darwin's theory.
b. Resistance and opposition: On the other hand, some conservative Muslim scholars strongly opposed Darwin's ideas, considering them a threat to the Islamic faith. They argued that the theory of evolution contradicted the Quranic account of creation, especially the creation of humans. This opposition led to heated debates and controversies in the Arab world.
c. Translation and dissemination: The Islamic religious context played a role in the translation of Darwin's works into Arabic. Translators often had to navigate the sensitive religious issues while rendering the texts, which sometimes led to alterations or omissions in the translations. Furthermore, the religious context influenced how Darwin's ideas were disseminated and discussed in the Arab world, shaping public opinion and debates surrounding the topic.
In conclusion, the reception of Darwin's ideas in the Arab world was closely tied to social and cultural issues in the age of imperialism, as well as influenced by the Islamic religious context. The complexity of this interaction led to diverse interpretations, applications, and responses to Darwin's theory of evolution in the Arab world.
Mediated communication is _____ than most face to face communication
A. More honest
B.less honest
C.richer
D.leaner
Answer:
D.leaner
Explanation:
Mediated communication refers to communication carried out by the use of information communication technology
Question 4 (2 points)
According to the Domino Theory, if South Vietnam fell to Communism, then -
According to the Domino Theory, if South Vietnam fell to Communism, then other countries in Southeast Asia would also fall to Communism, like a row of dominos. This was the basis for US involvement in the Vietnam War.
What was Vietnam War?The Vietnam War was a conflict that took place in Vietnam, Laos, and Cambodia from November 1, 1955, to April 30, 1975. The war was fought between the communist government of North Vietnam, supported by its allies, and the government of South Vietnam, supported by the United States and other anti-communist allies. The war resulted in the deaths of millions of Vietnamese civilians and soldiers, as well as thousands of U.S. military personnel. The war is often associated with controversy and protests in the United States, as many Americans opposed their country's involvement in the conflict. The war ended with the fall of Saigon and the reunification of Vietnam under communist rule.
To know more about vietnam war, visit:
https://brainly.com/question/11375126
#SPJ9
Compare the categories of the Global South giving features and characteristics of each category.
The Global South is a term used to refer to a group of countries with similar characteristics and issues, despite their geographical and cultural diversity. The categorization of these countries is complex, and there is no one-size-fits-all approach to defining them. However, one way to categorize the Global South is to look at their levels of economic development and political stability.
1) Least Developed Countries (LDCs):
These are countries that are considered to be at the lowest level of economic development, with low levels of human development and a high degree of vulnerability to external shocks. According to the United Nations, there are currently 46 LDCs, mostly located in sub-Saharan Africa and Asia. These countries face significant challenges in terms of poverty, food security, access to basic services, and infrastructure development.
2) Middle-Income Countries (MICs):
These countries are characterized by moderate levels of economic development and political stability, with relatively diverse economies and higher levels of human development. MICs are often seen as the engine of economic growth in the Global South, with large populations and growing middle classes driving demand for goods and services. Countries such as Brazil, China, India, and South Africa are often considered to be MICs.
3) Fragile and Conflict-Affected States (FCAS):
These are countries that face significant challenges related to political instability, conflict, and violence. FCAS are often characterized by weak governance, a lack of basic services, and high levels of poverty. Countries such as Afghanistan, Somalia, and Yemen are examples of FCAS. These countries face significant challenges in terms of development, with humanitarian crises often exacerbating existing issues.
To learn more about Global South:
https://brainly.com/question/17127333?referrer=searchResults
Can someone help with this one please and thank you.
Answer: were agonist
Explanation: hope this helps :D
How did French Revolution become more radical than the American Revolution?
Answer: The French Revolution became far more radical than the American Revolution. In addition to a period of extreme public violence, which became known as the Reign of Terror, the French Revolution also attempted to enhance the rights and power of poor people and women.
Explanation:His conclusion was that the forces of opposition in the aristocracy and the Old Regime in France were much greater than anything the Americans had had to overcome. In France everything had to be changed if reforms were to be introduced, hence “convulsions” were necessary and were to be expected.
What is the earliest writing in ancient China?
Help please!!! Lincoln v. Douglas
Analyze the excerpt from Lincoln’s speech by answering the following questions in complete sentences.
Question Response
What is Lincoln’s point of view regarding the future of the country?
Which statement from the excerpt shows his point of view?
Explain how the selected quote shows Lincoln’s point of view.
Analyze the excerpt from Douglas’s speech by answering the following questions in complete sentences.
Question Response
What is Douglas’s point of view regarding the Constitution?
Which statement from the excerpt shows his point of view?
Explain how the selected quote shows Douglas’s point of view.
Reflection:
How did Lincoln’s point of view differ from that of Douglas?
speach- Step 1: Study these excerpts from speeches given by Lincoln and Douglas:
A house divided against itself cannot stand. I believe this government cannot endure permanently half-slave and half-free. I do not expect the Union to be dissolved—I do not expect the house to fall—but I do expect it will cease to be divided. It will become all one thing or all the other.
—Abraham Lincoln, Springfield, Illinois, June 16, 1858
You can also view the entire speech, from the National Park Service.
I believe that the Union can only be preserved by maintaining inviolate the Constitution of the United States as our fathers have made it. That Constitution guarantees to the people of every State the right to have slavery or not have it…each State being left free to decide for itself. The framers of that Constitution…well understood that each one of the thirteen States had distinct and separate interests, and required distinct and separate local laws and local institutions.
—Stephen A. Douglas, Springfield, Illinois, June 17, 1858
Answer: lincioln poin of view is tyhart no mor sleavgery and 9its dooglous
Explanation:
reasd
give me blainleast
84. The Columbia River system receives most of its water supply from: *
A. heavy rainfall
B. snow melt
C. Monsoons
D. hurricanes
Answer:
b
Explanation:
Above average snowpack across the western United States and Canada, combined with a cooler and wetter than average spring have contributed to the highest water levels the Columbia River has seen in 15 years.
What is needed for coal to form? • high pressure and sunlight • heat and sunlight O high pressure and heat • water and sunlight
Leonardo to the Internet: Technology and Culture From the Renaissance to the Present, What did Misa mean in Chapter 5 when he referred to the "Business of Science?"
Provide and explain an example of this from Chapter 5.
In Chapter 5 of "Leonardo to the Internet: Technology and Culture From the Renaissance to the Present," Misa uses the term "business of science" to refer to the ways in which scientific research is organized, funded, and conducted in a capitalist economy.
What does Misa argue?Misa argues that the business of science has become increasingly driven by commercial interests and the pursuit of profit, which can sometimes conflict with the pursuit of knowledge for its own sake.
Misa also points out that the business of science can have negative consequences for society, such as the rising cost of healthcare and the exploitation of vulnerable populations in clinical trials.
However, he also acknowledges that the business of science has led to many important discoveries and innovations that have improved people's lives, such as new treatments for cancer and other diseases.
Overall, Misa's use of the term "business of science" highlights the complex relationship between science and capitalism, and the ways in which economic factors can shape the direction and priorities of scientific research.
Read more about internet here:
https://brainly.com/question/2780939
#SPJ1
Who are the Nubians?
Answer:
The Nubians are an ethnic group that primarily inhabits the region along the Nile River in northern Sudan and southern Egypt. The term "Nubian" is derived from the ancient Egyptian word "nub," which means "gold," as the region was known for its rich deposits of gold.
The Nubian people have a rich and complex history, with evidence of their civilization dating back to at least 3000 BC. They developed a unique culture and language, and were known for their expertise in agriculture, mining, and trade. Nubian kingdoms and empires, such as the Kingdom of Kush and the Nubian Empire, were also important players in ancient African and Middle Eastern history.
Today, Nubians continue to maintain their unique culture, language, and traditions, although their communities have faced significant challenges due to displacement, resettlement, and cultural assimilation.
Explanation:
Answer: Nubians (/ˈnuːbiənz, ˈnjuː-/) (Nobiin: Nobī, Arabic: النوبيون) are an ethnic group indigenous to the region which is now northern Sudan and southern Egypt. They originate from the early inhabitants of the central Nile valley, believed to be one of the earliest cradles of civilization.
Explanation:
I HOPE THIS HELPED YOU GOOD LUCK AND IF YOU NEED MORE ANSWERS CONTACT ME I AM ALWAYS OPENED!
Which is one ongoing obstacle to peace between Israel and Palestinian Arabs?
A.
Israel will not give up its settlements on the Sinai Peninsula.
B.
Palestinians want to take back land that once belonged to their families.
C.
The Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO) continues to deny Israel's right to exist.
D.
Egypt has refused to negotiate with Israel.
ANSWER NEEDED ASAP!!!
The statement that is not one ongoing obstacle to peace between Israel and Palestinian Arabs is: B. Palestinians want to take back land that once belonged to their families.
Which is one ongoing obstacle to peace between Israel and Palestinian Arabs?The conflict between Israel and Palestine is primarily about the control of land, with both sides claiming the same territory as their homeland. The Palestinians want to establish their own independent state with East Jerusalem as its capital, and they demand the right of return for Palestinian refugees who were displaced from their homes during the creation of Israel in 1948.
On the other hand, Israel insists on maintaining its settlements in the West Bank, which the Palestinians consider to be their land, and opposes the right of return for Palestinian refugees, fearing that it would lead to the end of Israel as a Jewish state.
Therefore the correct option is B.
Learn more about Palestinian here:https://brainly.com/question/30634690
#SPJ1