D,
b/c potato growers believe they are good/unhealthy
nutritionists see how they are unhealthily prepared and do not approve of them
Potato growers and nutritionists disagree. Option D is correct.
Potato growers and nutritionists disagree on the healthfulness of potatoes. Potato growers believe that potatoes can be healthful when prepared in other ways, such as boiled, baked, or roasted. Nutritionists, on the other hand, believe that potatoes are unhealthy, especially when they are fried or processed into chips or french fries. They argue that potatoes are high in calories and carbohydrates, and that they can contribute to weight gain and other health problems.
The disagreement between potato growers and nutritionists is a complex one. There is evidence to support both sides of the argument. On the one hand, potatoes are a good source of vitamins and minerals, including potassium, vitamin C, and fiber. They are also relatively inexpensive and easy to prepare. On the other hand, potatoes are high in calories and carbohydrates, and they can be a major source of unhealthy fats if they are fried or processed.
The disagreement between potato growers and nutritionists is likely to continue for some time. It is a complex issue with no easy answers. However, it is important to have this discussion so that we can make informed decisions about the foods that we eat.
To learn more about nutritionists, here
https://brainly.com/question/34363436
#SPJ3
a. Computers store and ......... ..... data
Help help help help English English
e think its B
pls correct me if im wrong
since this morning,_______has been reading.______
Answer:
since the morning I has been reading
A claim about a cause-and-effect relationship should be supported with examples that show what?
similar causes having the same effect
comparison and contrast of characters’ behavior
different types of causes having the same effect
ways that the narrator makes certain things happen
Answer:
similar causes having the same effect (A)
Explanation:
I just took the test and had it correct
I'LL GIVE YOU EXTRA POINTS
Leon bridges on overcoming childhood isolation in finding his voice you can’t teach soul Study sync article.
1) Why didn’t bridges dream of being a soul singer when he was growing up
2) Why did Leon bridges have difficulty fitting in as a kid
3) Site specific details from the text to describe how bridges developed a sense of style he is now known for in the performances what is the ironic or unexpected about the actual origins of bridges style
Answer:
1) He didn't think he could sing. In the text, it says, "'I didn't think I could sing,' says Bridges. 'I knew I could do stuff here and there, but didn't think I was good enough to fit.'"
2)His parents got separated when he was 7, his family was poor. In the text, it says, " After his parents separated when he was 7, he split time between suburban Fort Worth and inner-city Dallas, where his father worked at a community center.His family was poor, and shortly after Hurricane Katrina, 10 relatives from New Orleans temporarily came to live with him, his mother, and his half-sister."
3) Bridges said that his mom's friends gave him their old childhood clothes. In the text, it says, "He met Austin Jenkins, guitarist from Austin psych-rock band White Denim, at a Fort Worth bar. He noticed Bridges' singular '50s fashion style—crisp slacks, starched collars, high-waist jeans, exquisite vintage suits. suits. ('It all started when one of my mom's older friends gave me his childhood clothes when I was a teenager," says Bridges of his look. "It's funny when people think it's just a marketing scheme.')"
In a work of literature written during the Age of Imperialism, a protagonist must confront an elephant which poses a danger to the
community and has already killed one man.
Which type of conflict does this work show?
A. external
B. supporting
C. peaceful
D. internal
Explanation:
Shooting an Elephant” first appeared in 1936. The British public already knew Orwell as the socially conscious author of Down and Out in London and Paris (1933), a nonfiction study of poverty, homelessness, unemployment, and subsistence living on poorly-paying menial jobs, and Burmese Days (1934), a novel of British colonialism. “Shooting an Elephant” functions as an addendum to Burmese Days. The story and novel share the same setting, and draw on Orwell’s experience as a colonial official in India and Burma, two regions of the British Empire, in the middle of the century between the two world wars. The story (which some critics consider an essay) concerns a colonial officer’s obligation to shoot a rogue elephant. The narrator does not want to shoot the elephant, but feels compelled to by a crowd of indigenous residents, before whom he does not wish to appear indecisive or cowardly. The situation and events that Orwell describes underscores the hostility between the administrators of the British Empire and their “native” subjects. Both sides feel hatred, distrust, and resentment. The situation is universally degrading. The shooting itself involves enormous pathos conveyed economically in a few words.