Renting land from a landowner in return for a share of the crop is called
.

Answer:

Judicial review is the power of the courts to review and potentially strike down actions taken by the legislative or executive branches of government that are deemed to be unconstitutional. This power is not explicitly mentioned in the U.S. Constitution, but it has been recognized and utilized by the Supreme Court in a number of landmark cases.

The legal case that established the use of judicial review was Marbury v. Madison, which was decided by the U.S. Supreme Court in 1803. In that case, the Court ruled that the Judiciary Act of 1789, which had been passed by Congress, was unconstitutional. This decision established the principle that the Supreme Court has the authority to declare a law unconstitutional and therefore null and void.

Explanation:

Answer: Marbury v. Madison (1803)

Explanation:

Judicial review is a process by which courts review the legality of the actions of the other branches of government, such as executive and legislative branches. Judicial review confirms that the actions of the other branches are consistent with the law and the Constitution. The landmark case of Marbury v. Madison (1803) established the use of judicial review in the United States. In this case, Chief Justice John Marshall established the principle of judicial review by ruling that it was the Supreme Court’s duty to determine whether laws passed by Congress were constitutional or not. This ruling established the Supreme Court as the final arbiter of the laws of the United States.

Explanation:

Federalist 51 is an essay written by James Madison, one of the Founding Fathers of the United States, which focuses on the importance of the separation of powers and checks and balances in government. While the essay does not explicitly address the rights of minorities, it does propose a system of government that is designed to protect individual rights and prevent the tyranny of the majority.

Madison argues that the separation of powers between the legislative, executive, and judicial branches of government creates a system of checks and balances that helps to prevent any one branch from becoming too powerful. This system ensures that no single group or individual has too much influence over government decisions, which helps to protect the rights of all citizens, including minorities.

In addition, Madison suggests that the size and diversity of the United States makes it less likely that any one group will be able to dominate the political system. He writes, "In the extended republic of the United States, and among the great variety of interests, parties, and sects which it embraces, a coalition of a majority of the whole society could seldom take place on any other principles than those of justice and the general good."

Overall, while Federalist 51 does not specifically address the rights of minorities, Madison's emphasis on the importance of a system of checks and balances and the diversity of interests in the United States suggests that he believed in protecting the rights of all citizens, including those in the minority.

Answer:

The issue of slavery played a significant role in the early history of the United States, and it is true that many of the Founding Fathers were slave owners themselves. However, it is also true that there were those who opposed slavery and sought to leave it untouched in the early Constitution in the hopes that it would eventually die out. It is therefore inaccurate to say that the United States was "founded on slavery," as this overlooks the complex and often conflicting views held by those who shaped the country's early history. While it is important to acknowledge the role that slavery played in the formation of the United States and its institutions, it is equally important to recognize the diversity of perspectives and motivations that contributed to the country's founding.

Answer:

Peter is in the locomotor stage of physical development. At this stage, children are beginning to develop their large motor skills and are exploring their surroundings through crawling and walking.

Answer:

First, you will need to do some research on the lure and consequences of World War I. Look for images that depict the military power, destruction of towns/cities/countries, death, and causalities. You can use search engines, historical archives, or photo databases to find appropriate images. Be sure to keep track of your sources so you can list them on the reference page.

Once you have a collection of images, organize them according to the layout plan. Your title page should clearly state what your photo montage is about. The photo montage should include a balance of images that show both the benefits and costs of total war. Consider the composition, color scheme, and tone of each image as you arrange them on the page. You may need to resize or crop some images to fit the layout.

Finally, construct a response that explains your photo montage. Use the images to illustrate your points and provide context for each one. Discuss the significance of the benefits and costs of World War I, and how they impacted the world at the time and beyond. Be sure to reference your sources on the reference page.

Remember to be creative and thoughtful in your approach to this performance task. Good luck!

Answer:

Explanation:

1. The president's power to pardon is granted by Article II, Section 2, Clause 1 of the U.S. Constitution.

2. The power to pardon is an executive power that is not subject to review or oversight by Congress or the judiciary. However, the Constitution allows for the impeachment and removal of a president who abuses the pardon power.

3. Pardon is the forgiveness of a crime and the cancellation of the relevant penalty or punishment. Commutation, on the other hand, is the reduction of a sentence, usually from a more severe punishment to a less severe one.

4. The Constitution places no specific limitations on the President's pardon or commutation powers. However, there is a general understanding that these powers should not be used for corrupt or self-serving purposes.

5. The Department of Justice is involved in the pardon and commutation process by reviewing and making recommendations to the President on petitions for clemency. The President is not required to follow the DOJ's recommendations.

6. President George W. Bush pardoned 189 individuals and commuted the sentence of 11 people.

7. President George W. Bush commuted the sentences of Lewis “Scooter” Libby, Jose A Compean, and Ignacio Ramos. Libby was convicted of perjury and obstruction of justice in connection with the leak of CIA agent Valerie Plame's identity. Compean and Ramos were Border Patrol agents convicted of shooting an unarmed drug smuggler and then covering up the incident.

8. President Obama pardoned 212 individuals and commuted the sentence of 1,715 people.

9. President Obama commuted the sentence of Chelsea Manning, a former Army intelligence analyst who was convicted of leaking classified documents to WikiLeaks. He also pardoned James Cartwright, a retired Marine Corps general who pleaded guilty to lying to the FBI about leaking information to reporters.

10. President Trump pardoned 143 individuals and commuted the sentence of 94 people.

11. President Trump pardoned Joseph Arpaio, a former Arizona sheriff who was convicted of criminal contempt for defying a court order to stop racial profiling. He also pardoned Susan B. Anthony, a women's suffrage activist who was convicted of voting illegally in 1872, and Michael Flynn, a former national security adviser who pleaded guilty to lying to the FBI.

12. President Biden pardoned 3 felons  and commuted the sentence of 73 people.

Columbus and the Spanish are often related to the discovery of south America, however in reality, they were civilized in their own way before colonization and exploitation came in.

Columbus and the Spanish are often portrayed in historical artwork and literature as heroic figures who discovered new lands and brought civilization and Christianity to the native populations. They are often shown wearing elaborate clothing and armor, with symbols of their wealth and power.

The native populations they encountered are often portrayed as exotic and primitive, and sometimes even as savages. However, this view of Columbus and the Spanish has been increasingly challenged in recent years as more attention is given to the negative impact of colonialism and the exploitation and mistreatment of native populations.

Learn more on Columbus here;

https://brainly.com/question/10813507

#SPJ1

The decision to use the atomic bomb on Japan was a highly controversial one and has been debated for decades. There is no single "logical" conclusion that can be drawn to justify the use of the atomic bomb based solely on the atrocities that American soldiers experienced in the Pacific.

While it is true that American soldiers faced brutal conditions and suffered significant casualties during the Pacific W.a.r, it is important to recognize that the decision to use the atomic bomb had complex and multifaceted motivations. These included factors such as the desire to bring a swift end to the w.a.r, the fear of a protracted invasion of Japan, and the desire to demonstrate American military superiority to the Soviet Union.

Moreover, it is important to recognize that the atomic bombings had devastating consequences for the Japanese people, causing enormous loss of life and long-term health effects. Some historians argue that Japan was already on the verge of surrender, and that the use of the atomic bomb was unnecessary and immoral. Others argue that the bombing was a necessary step to end the war and save American lives.

In conclusion, there is no single "logical" conclusion that can be drawn to justify the use of the atomic bomb based solely on the atrocities experienced by American soldiers in the Pacific. The decision to use the atomic bomb was a complex one with multiple factors and motivations, and it continues to be a subject of debate and discussion among historians and policymakers.

learn more about atomic bomb: https://brainly.com/question/140986

#SPJ1

Answer:

The Cold War instigated strong anti-communism within the USA. The hatred towards Communism was so great that it eventually led to McCarthyism. During McCarthyism, Americans were obsessed with the process of identifying the Communists and removing those Communists from American society.

The Cold War was reflected in culture through music, movies, books, television, and other media, as well as sports, social beliefs, and behavior. Major elements of the Cold War included the threat of communist expansion, a nuclear war, and – connected to both – espionage.

Explanation:

Hope this helps

Answer: The Common enemy that the Would-be Americans had(The British forces), along with the anger from them being forced into having be ruled over. And their vast supplies from years of being there for about a century. And allies from other country's wanting to help them in the effort.

Answer:

C. strikes

Explanation:

During World War II, strikes by workers were considered unpatriotic because they disrupted the production of war materials and equipment needed to support the war effort. The United States government and many Americans believed that workers had a responsibility to put aside their personal grievances and work together for the common good during the war. Strikes were seen as undermining this shared national goal and potentially putting American soldiers in danger. As a result, the government passed legislation to restrict the right to strike and unions agreed not to strike during the war.

Under the Reconstruction Act of 1867, Southern states were required to meet several conditions before they could be readmitted to the Union. These conditions included:

The Reconstruction Act of 1867 was a federal law passed by the United States Congress in the aftermath of the Civil War. The act was designed to reorganize and rebuild the Southern states that had seceded from the Union and to ensure that newly freed slaves were protected and given full citizenship rights.

The Reconstruction Act of 1867 divided the Southern states into five military districts, each governed by a Union general. It also required the states to hold new constitutional conventions and to guarantee equal rights and protections for all citizens, regardless of race. The act mandated that African American men be allowed to vote and hold office, and it temporarily barred former Confederate officials and military leaders from holding office.

To learn more about the Reconstruction Act of 1867, click

https://brainly.com/question/3617477

#SPJ1

Answer:

Boston Massacre happened on March 5, 1770

Boston Tea Party happened on December 16, 1773

Intolerable Acts happened on March 31, 1774

Quartering Act happened on May 15, 1765

Explanation:

Boston Massacre

Boston Tea Party

Intolerable Acts

Quartering Act

It significantly decreased the volume of exported goods and sharply increased the price of imports, making them expensive for anyone but the wealthiest and causing bank failures, especially in agricultural areas.(option a)

To shield American farmers as well as other businesses from foreign competition, the Smoot-Hawley Trade Act of 1930 increased import duties. It is now commonly believed that Smoot-Hawley Tariff Act contributed to the severity of a Great Depression that ravaged the United States and around the world. Often known as that of the Smoot-Hawley Tax or even the Hawley-Smoot Tariff, the law's official name is the United States Border tax Law of 1930. Senators Reed Owen Going to understand (R-Utah) & House. Willis Chatman Hawley sponsored it (R-Ore.).

To know more about Smoot-Hawley Tariff visit:

https://brainly.com/question/9312838

#SPJ1

Explanation:

1) Differences between the states that emerged in the savanna and forest zones of Ghana:

Military: The savanna states, such as the Kingdom of Dagbon and Mamprusi, had a strong military tradition and a centralized system of governance, which allowed them to expand their territories through conquest. In contrast, forest states such as the Asante and Fante had a more decentralized system of governance and relied on alliances and diplomacy to maintain their power and influence.

Succession: In the savanna states, succession to the throne was usually based on the principle of primogeniture, where the eldest son inherited the throne. In contrast, in forest states, succession was more fluid, and the king was often chosen from among a group of eligible candidates.

Religion: In the savanna states, Islam played a significant role in shaping the culture and society, while in forest states, traditional African religions were more prevalent. However, some forest states, such as the Ashanti Empire, also embraced Islam as a religion.

Economic: The savanna states were more focused on trade, particularly with the trans-Saharan trade routes, while the forest states were more involved in agriculture and mining, particularly gold mining.

2)The role of geography in shaping the socio-cultural practices of these two zones: The differences between the savanna and forest states can be partly attributed to the geographical conditions of each zone. The savanna region is characterized by open grasslands, which made it easier for the savanna states to engage in long-distance trade and expand their territories through conquest. In contrast, the forest region is characterized by dense forests, which made it harder to expand territories and engage in long-distance trade. The forest states, therefore, relied on alliances and diplomacy to maintain their power and influence. The forest region also had a more diverse ecology, which allowed for a variety of economic activities, including agriculture and mining. This, in turn, influenced the socio-cultural practices of the forest states, such as their emphasis on agriculture and their use of gold as a symbol of power and wealth.

In conclusion, while geography played a role in shaping the differences between the savanna and forest states of Ghana, other factors such as culture, religion, and economic activity also contributed to these differences. It is essential to take a holistic view of these factors when analyzing the history and development of these states.

Answer:

Geography played a significant role in shaping life in the West during the westward movement. The West was characterized by a diverse landscape that included mountains, deserts, grasslands, and forests, and these physical features had a profound impact on the development of the region.

One of the most significant effects of geography was the availability of natural resources. The West had abundant natural resources, including minerals, timber, and fertile soil. This fueled the westward movement, as settlers sought land and economic opportunity.

However, the geography of the West also presented challenges. The harsh climates, rugged terrain, and lack of water made settlement and travel difficult. Settlers had to adapt to the environment by using new farming techniques, building irrigation systems, and developing new modes of transportation.

The geography of the West also had a significant impact on the Native American populations who lived there. Many Native American tribes had adapted to their local environments and had developed unique cultures and ways of life. As settlers moved westward, they often disrupted these communities, leading to conflict and displacement.

In conclusion, geography played a significant role in shaping life in the West during the westward movement. It provided abundant natural resources but also presented challenges that settlers had to overcome. The impact of geography on the Native American populations was also significant, leading to significant changes in their ways of life.

Explanation:

Answer: In 1954, the ACLU joined forces with the NAACP to challenge racial segregation in public schools. The resulting Supreme Court decision in Brown v.

Explanation:

Answer:

Mead: Mead is a fermented drink made from honey, water, and yeast. It was popular in medieval Europe and was often associated with the Vikings.

Ale: Ale is a type of beer that is brewed using a warm fermentation process. It was the most common alcoholic drink in medieval Europe and was often brewed in monasteries and taverns.

Wine: Wine was also popular in medieval Europe, especially in areas with suitable climate and soil for grape growing. It was often consumed by the wealthy and was seen as a symbol of wealth and status.

Cider: Cider is a fermented drink made from apples. It was popular in medieval England, where it was often made in monasteries and was consumed by both the wealthy and the poor.

Kombucha: Kombucha is a fermented tea drink that originated in China and was consumed in medieval Europe. It was made by fermenting sweetened tea with a culture of bacteria and yeast.

Kvass: Kvass is a fermented drink made from rye bread and water. It was popular in medieval Russia and was often consumed by peasants.Mead: Mead is a fermented drink made from honey, water, and yeast. It was popular in medieval Europe and was often associated with the Vikings.

Ale: Ale is a type of beer that is brewed using a warm fermentation process. It was the most common alcoholic drink in medieval Europe and was often brewed in monasteries and taverns.

Wine: Wine was also popular in medieval Europe, especially in areas with suitable climate and soil for grape growing. It was often consumed by the wealthy and was seen as a symbol of wealth and status.

Cider: Cider is a fermented drink made from apples. It was popular in medieval England, where it was often made in monasteries and was consumed by both the wealthy and the poor.

Kombucha: Kombucha is a fermented tea drink that originated in China and was consumed in medieval Europe. It was made by fermenting sweetened tea with a culture of bacteria and yeast.

Kvass: Kvass is a fermented drink made from rye bread and water. It was popular in medieval Russia and was often consumed by peasants.

Explanation:

Answer:

Explanation:

"Our country right or wrong" is a phrase often associated with defending the Vietnam War. The idea behind this phrase is that one should support their country regardless of its actions. Those who defended the Vietnam War believed that the United States had a moral obligation to stop the spread of communism in Southeast Asia, and that supporting the war effort was necessary to fulfill that obligation. They also believed that opposing the war was unpatriotic and undermined the efforts of American soldiers. However, critics of the war argued that blind support of the government and military actions can lead to unjust and immoral actions, and that it is possible to love one's country while still criticizing its policies and actions.

Answer:

d

Explanation:

Executive agreements are agreements made between the President and another country, which do not require Senate ratification like treaties do. They are legally binding agreements that allow the President to take action on behalf of the United States without the need for congressional approval. These agreements can cover a wide range of topics, including trade, defense, and diplomacy, and are used as a tool of foreign policy. Option d) is the correct answer.

Most likely A

B, E definitely not

Can you explain more, please?

Answer:

A constant nonviolent state of hostility between the Soviet Union and the US; began shortly after WWII with the rapid extension of Soviet influence over eastern Europe and North Korea; ended with the collapse of communism in Eastern Europe and the former Soviet Union.

Explanation:

Answer:

Explanation:

The text of the Constitution itself does not explicitly state whether or not capital punishment is constitutional. The Fifth Amendment mentions "capital crime" as a possible reason for someone to be deprived of life, but it does not necessarily endorse capital punishment as a form of punishment. The Eighth Amendment prohibits "cruel and unusual punishments," which could potentially include capital punishment, depending on one's interpretation.

Therefore, it is difficult to say which side has the better argument based solely on the text of the Constitution. Both sides can make reasonable arguments based on their interpretations of the Constitution.

As for the proposal that made reference to "capital crimes" in the Fifth Amendment and a ban on capital punishment in the Eighth Amendment, it is not necessarily contradictory. The Fifth Amendment allows for the possibility of capital punishment, but it does not require it. The Eighth Amendment prohibits "cruel and unusual punishments," which could potentially include capital punishment if it is deemed to be cruel or unusual. So, it is possible for someone to argue that while capital punishment may be allowed in some cases, it should be banned as a cruel and unusual punishment.

The freedom of the press is a fundamental democratic

 ideal and a fundamental right in the United States. 

A free press, which is safeguarded by the First Amendment of the United States Constitution, aids in preserving the balance of power in politics.

The Separate-But-Equal Doctrine was a legal doctrine in the United States that allowed for the racial segregation of public facilities, such as schools and transportation, as long as they were "equal" in quality.

Legal doctrine is a set of rules and principles which courts use to interpret and apply laws. It is based on precedent, which is a court's decision in a previous similar legal case. In some countries, legal doctrine is also sometimes referred to as jurisprudence. Legal doctrine helps to develop more consistent rulings in similar disputes and to help ensure that the law is applied in a predictable and consistent manner.

This doctrine was used to justify discrimination against African Americans and other minority groups. The doctrine was established in 1896 in the Supreme Court case of Plessy v. Ferguson, and it remained in effect until 1954 when the Supreme Court reversed its decision in the case of Brown v. Board of Education.

To learn more about legal doctrine
https://brainly.com/question/704009
#SPJ1

Unlike President Lincoln, the Radical Republicans in Congress wanted to: A. require 50 percent of all Confederate voters to pledge allegiance to the Union.

Lincoln's proposal was criticized by the Radical Republicans because they felt it was too forgiving of the South. Radical Republicans thought Lincoln's Reconstruction plan was too lenient because, in their eyes, the South had started the war and should be punished accordingly.

In contrast to Lincoln's intended 10%, the Wade-Davis Bill mandated that before reunification, 50% of all voters in the Confederate states must declare their allegiance to the Union. The Bill also prohibited slavery in the states that were in rebellion, in addition to the loyalty oath.

To know more about  Radical Republican Party, refer to:

https://brainly.com/question/29378489

#SPJ1

Answer: C

Explanation: i just took the test

Answer: his legacy was the end of Macedonian Empire that Philip and Alexander took so hard to build.

Explanation:

I don't have any, just remember it from last year...