Please ASAP Help
Will mark brainlest due at 12:00​

The equation for modeling its exponential decay is N(t) = 16 * e^(-0.0578t) where N(t) is the amount of radioactive element remaining after t hours.

We can use the formula for exponential decay to model the decay of the radioactive element. The formula is:

N(t) = N0 * e^(-kt)

where N(t) is the amount of the radioactive element remaining after t hours, N0 is the initial amount of the element, e is the mathematical constant approximately equal to 2.71828, and k is a constant that represents the rate of decay.

We are given that half of the initial 16-gram sample remains after 12 hours. That means the initial amount N0 is 16 grams and the amount remaining after 12 hours is 8 grams. We can use these values to solve for k.

8 = 16 * e^(-k*12)

Dividing both sides by 16, we get:

0.5 = e^(-12k)

Taking the natural logarithm of both sides, we get:

ln(0.5) = -12k

Solving for k, we get:

k = -ln(0.5)/12

k ≈ 0.0578

Therefore, the constant k for this radioactive element is approximately 0.0578. The equation of modeling its exponential decay is

N(t) = 16 * e^(-0.0578t)

where N(t) is the amount of radioactive element.

To know more about amount of radioactive element:

https://brainly.com/question/16784053

#SPJ4

The side length of dilated cubes is 10.08 units. Then the surface area of the dilated cube is 609.6384 square units.

What is dilation?

Dilation means the changing of the size of the object without changing the shape. The size of the object may be increased or decreased based on the scale factor.

A solid has a volume of 2 cubic units and a surface area of 10 square units.

The solid is dilated, and the image has a volume of 128 cubic units.

Let the original side length of the cube be a and dilated length of the cube be b.

MsReid CTEA

Answer

=5

4^5=2x2x=1024x=512 

Answer:

Answer below

Step-by-step explanation:

2 1/4, 2 3/4, 3 1/4, 3 3/4

Answer:[tex]2\frac{1}{4} , 2\frac{3}{4} , 3\frac{1}{4} , 3\frac{3}{4}[/tex]

Step-by-step explanation:

This series is in arithmetic progression, where all the elements in this series increase progressively. They have a common difference. You can find the common difference by substracting any term by its preceding term as:

d = t(n+1) - t(n)

In this case:

[tex]\frac{3}{4} - \frac{1}{4} = \frac{1}{2}[/tex]

You can use the cd. to find the remaining elements by adding the difference to the 4th term to find the 5th term, and adding it to 5th term to get the 6th term and so on.

The half-life of Potassium-40 is 1.25 billion years. The decay equation for Potassium-40 can be expressed as N(t) = N0e-kt, where N(t) is the amount of Potassium-40 at time t, N0 is the initial amount of Potassium-40, and k is the decay constant.

Decay constant is a measure of the rate at which a radioactive sample decays. It is usually expressed as the probability of a given radioactive nucleus decaying per unit time. It is related to the half-life of a radioactive sample, which is the time it takes for half of the sample to decay.

To answer part b, we need to solve N(t) = 15 mg. When rearranged, this equation becomes t = ln(15/N0)/(-k). Using the given initial amount of 36 mg and the calculated decay constant of 0.00056, we find that it will take 1.44 billion years for the specimen to decay to 15 mg.

For part c, we can use the same equation and solve for N(t). We get N(t) = N0e-kt, where N(t) is the amount of Potassium-40 at time t, N0 is the initial amount of Potassium-40, and k is the decay constant. Using the initial amount of 36 mg and the decay constant of 0.00056, we find that after 300 million years, there will be 27.72 mg of Potassium-40 left.

For part d, we can solve N(t) = N0/8. When rearranged, this equation becomes t = ln(N0/8)/(-k). With the initial amount of 36 mg and the decay constant of 0.00056, we find that it will take 2.68 billion years for Potassium-40 to decay to one-eighth of its original amount.

For more questions related to probability

https://brainly.com/question/251701

#SPJ1

The amount of pineapple juice that was left in the batch after a quantity was removed for testing would be = 77,000cm³

The total volume of juice that was produced in the batch = 0.08m³

To convert 0.08m³ to cm the following is carried out;

1 m³ = 1,000,000

0.08m³ = X

make X the subject of formula;

X = 0.08×1,000,000

X = 80000 cm³

The quantity of pineapple juice that was removed = 3000 cm³

The quantity left = 80000-3000 = 77,000cm³

Learn more about volume here:

https://brainly.com/question/27710307

#SPJ1

Answer: The tiger eats 13.875 pounds more food per day than the large dog.

Step-by-step explanation: A tiger eats approximately 15 pounds of food per day, while a large dog eats about 18 ounces of food per day. To determine how many more pounds of food a tiger eats per day than a large dog, we need to convert the weight of the dog's food into pounds. Since there are 16 ounces in a pound, 18 ounces is equivalent to 18/16 = 1.125 pounds. Therefore, the tiger eats 15 - 1.125 = 13.875 pounds more food per day than the large dog.

The loan rate assumptions are:

1) Assumption that the family has good credit

2) Assumption that the family is borrowing for a large purchase

3) Assumption that the loan is secured

Savings Plan Rate Assumptions are:

1) Assumption that the family has a significant amount of disposable income

2) Assumption that the family has a long investment horizon

3) Assumption that the family has a high tolerance for risk

There are a few assumptions that may not necessarily be valid for a typical family regarding both the loan rate and savings plan rate. Some of these assumptions include:

a. Assumption that the family has good credit: Most loan rate calculators assume that the borrower has good credit.

b. Assumption that the family is borrowing for a large purchase: Many loan rate calculators assume that the family is borrowing for a large purchase, such as a house or a car.

c. Assumption that the loan is secured: Many loan rate calculators assume that the loan is secured by collateral, such as a house or a car.

a. Assumption that the family has a significant amount of disposable income: Many savings plan calculators assume that the family has a significant amount of disposable income to invest in a savings plan.

b. Assumption that the family has a long investment horizon: Many savings plan calculators assume that the family has a long investment horizon, such as 10 or 20 years.

c. Assumption that the family has a high tolerance for risk: Many savings plan calculators assume that the family has a high tolerance for risk and can invest in high-risk investments that offer a higher rate of return.

Learn more about assumption here

brainly.com/question/29380966

#SPJ4

The expressions (3x+19) and (5x-9) when set equal gives the solution x = 14

Equivalent equation is an assertion that two expressions are equal, expressed by writing the two expressions separated by an equal sign from which one is to determine a particular quantity.

(3x + 19) = (5x - 9)

open parenthesis

3x + 19 = 5x - 9

combine like terms

3x - 5x = -9 - 19

-2x = -28

divide both sides by -2

x = -28/-2

x = 14

Therefore, x = 14 is the solution to the expressions when set equal.

Read more on equation:

https://brainly.com/question/2972832

#SPJ1

6 × 3 × 3  square inches will give the total surface area of the solid figure.

What is surface area?

The surface area is the area occupied by a two-dimensional flat surface. It has a square unit of measurement. The surface area of a three-dimensional object is the space taken up by its outer surface.

We are given a figure which contains six squares and the dimensions of each square are 3 inches each.

Area of one square = 3 × 3  square inches

Total surface area = 6 × 3 × 3  square inches

Hence, 6 × 3 × 3  square inches will give the total surface area of the solid figure.

Learn more about surface area from the given link

https://brainly.com/question/951562

#SPJ1

The missing figure of the question has been attached below.

In response to the stated question, we can state that The new balance is equation therefore $55.59.

An equation is a mathematical assertion that establishes the equality of two expressions that are joined together by the equals sign ('='). For example, 2x – 5 = 13. 2x-5 and 13 are examples of expressions. The letter '=' connects the two expressions. A mathematical formula is called an equation if it contains two algebraic expressions on either side of the equal sign (=). It shows how the right and left formulas are equivalent to one another. Any formula will result in L.H.S. = R.H.S. (left side = right side).

We must ascertain the balance that is still owing after the payment and purchase transactions have been executed in order to calculate the unpaid balance.

The balance drops to $35.51 on April 15 ($50.51 - $15.00), a reduction of $15.00.

The account balance climbs to $54.78 ($35.51 + $19.27) on April 25.

The remaining balance is $54.78 as a result.

$44.29 * (0.18 / 365) * 30 = $0.81

The finance fee is therefore $0.81.

We combine the outstanding balance and the finance charge to determine the new balance:

$54.78 + $0.81 = $55.59

The new balance is therefore $55.59.

To know more about equation visit:

https://brainly.com/question/649785

#SPJ1

the optimal price and quantity for the bags of concrete should be amount $100 and 10,000 bags, respectively. This combination would yield a total economic surplus of $500,000.

Q = 10,000 - 100P

Where Q is the quantity of bags and P is the price per bag.

The goal of the regulation is to maximize total economic surplus.

To maximize total economic surplus, the optimal price and quantity for the bags of concrete should be determined. The total economic surplus for this situation can be calculated by finding the area of the triangle formed between the demand curve and the price line.

The optimal price is calculated by setting the demand equation equal to zero, giving P = 100.

The optimal quantity is calculated by substituting the optimal price into the demand equation, giving Q = 10,000.

The total economic surplus is calculated by finding the area of the triangle formed between the demand curve and the price line, which is (100*10,000)/2 = $500,000 amount.

Therefore, the optimal price and quantity for the bags of concrete should be $100 and 10,000 bags, respectively. This combination would yield a total economic surplus of $500,000.

Learn more about amount here

https://brainly.com/question/8082054

#SPJ4

The 3/4  is questionable figure in the statement because it is based on a limited and potentially unrepresentative sample.

The statement "We know that 3/4 of Australians work force are happily with their jobs" is based on the survey results of only 100 government employees aged 25-30. While this may provide an indication of job satisfaction among this particular group, it is not necessarily representative of the entire Australian workforce.

The sample size of 100 employees is relatively small, and the sample may not be representative of the larger population. Additionally, the sample only includes government employees aged 25-30, which further limits its generalizability. There may be significant differences in job satisfaction levels among different age groups or in different industries.

To learn more about questionable figure click on,

brainly.com/question/9761567

#SPJ4

Answer: x=51

Step-by-step explanation: Add 7 to both sides of the equation.

Please give brainliest !!

Answer:

x = 51

Step-by-step explanation:

44 = -7 + x

+7   +7

51 = x

x = 51

Answer: x = 0 represents the price of the drink

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

  17/25

Step-by-step explanation:

You want to know which of 5/16 or 17/25 is closer to 1/2.

For the sake of argument, let's assume that 17/25 is closer to 1/2. This means the difference from 1/2 is smaller than for 5/16:

  (17/25 -1/2) < (1/2 -5/16)

We can add (5/16 + 1/2) to both sides and we get ...

  17/25 + 5/16 < 1

The sum on the left is easily computed:

  (17·16 +25·5)/(25·16) < 1

  (272 +125)/400 < 1

  397/400 < 1 . . . . . . true

Our original premise is true: 17/25 is closer to 1/2.

__

Additional comment

A straightforward solution involves finding the positive difference of each number from 1/2, then comparing those differences. The attached calculator screen does that. It shows the difference of 17/25 from 1/2 is smaller than for 5/16, in agreement with the above.

Effectively, we're comparing the midpoint between the two numbers to 1/2. If it is below 1/2 (which it is), then the upper number doesn't have as great a distance from 1/2 as the lower number does.

This sort of comparison only works if the numbers are on either side of 1/2. If they are on the same side, the sign of their difference tells the tale.

The fare that would maximize revenue is $70.

To prove this, we must first calculate the number of passengers who will use the train at different fares. This is because the revenue formula for this is:

Revenue = Fares x Passengers

where revenue is a function of both the fare and the number of passengers using the train. From the given data, we have:

Initial Fare = $50

Initial Passengers = 10,000

Assuming X = Increase in fare (in dollars) and Y = Decrease in passengers, we can derive the following table:

Fare ($)|Passengers|Revenue ($)
--|--|--
50|10,000|500,000
60|9,000|540,000
70|8,000|560,000
80|7,000|560,000
90|6,000|540,000

Here's how we computed it:

Starting at the $50 fare, every additional $10 fare increase decreases the number of passengers by 1000 (see the problem statement). So, at $60, the number of passengers is 10,000 – 1,000 = 9,000. Similarly, at $70, the number of passengers is 10,000 – 2,000 = 8,000. Continuing this way, we can fill in the table. Then, we can plug in the values of fares and passengers into the revenue formula to obtain the revenue values in the last column.

Note that the revenue maximizes at a fare of $70 because at that point, the revenue is the highest ($560,000) compared to any other fare in the table. Therefore, the fare that maximizes revenue is $70.

Learn more about Revenue

brainly.com/question/8645356

#SPJ11

Using the half ten fact for rounding and distributive property helped us efficiently solve the multiplication problem of 47 x 550.

Let's take the 2-digit number 47 and multiply it by the 3-digit number 550:

To use the half ten fact, we can first round the 3-digit number to the nearest half ten, which in this case would be 550 rounded to 550 + 50 = 600.

Then, we can split the 2-digit number into its tens and ones digits: 47 = 40 + 7.

Next, we can use the distributive property of multiplication to simplify the problem:

47 x 600 = (40 + 7) x 600 = 40 x 600 + 7 x 600

Now, we can use the half ten fact for the first term: 40 x 600 = (20 x 10) x 600 = 20 x (10 x 600) = 20 x 6000 = 120,000.

For the second term, we can use the fact that 7 x 6 = 42:

7 x 600 = 7 x (10 x 60) = (7 x 10) x 60 = 70 x 60 = 4,200.

Finally, we can add the two terms to get the final answer:

47 x 550 = 47 x 600 - 47 x 50 = 120,000 + 4,200 - 2,350 = 121,850.

Therefore, using the half ten fact for rounding and distributive property helped us efficiently solve the multiplication problem of 47 x 550.

For more such questions on multiplication problems

https://brainly.com/question/10873737

#SPJ4

The fraction of the square represented by a figure constructed with pieces of a tangram can be calculated by dividing the area of the figure by the area of the square.

The fraction of the square that a figure constructed with the pieces of a tangram represents can be calculated by dividing the area of the figure with the area of the square. The area of a square can be determined using the formula A = s2, where s is the side length of the square. The area of the figure can be calculated by adding together the area of the individual pieces of the tangram. For example, if the figure is composed of two triangles with base lengths of b1 and b2 and heights h1 and h2, then the area of the figure can be calculated using the formula A = b1h1 + b2h2. The fraction of the square represented by the figure is calculated by dividing the area of the figure by the area of the square.

Learn more about fraction  here:

https://brainly.com/question/10708469

#SPJ4

The value of x is 13.

A line segment is a straight line formed by a continuous arrangement of series of points. As such, it can be divided into parts.

Considering the given question, it can be deduced that; MP is a line segment which has been divided into two parts MN and NP.

Thus we have;

MP = MN + NP

But we are given that; MN = x - 1, NP = 9x - 68, and MP = 5x - 4.

Then we can say that;

MP = MN + NP

5x - 4 = (x-1) + (9x - 68)

          = 10x - 69

collect like terms

69 - 4 = 10x - 5x

65 = 5x

x = 65/ 5

  = 13

The value of x is 13.

MP = 5x - 4

     = 5(13) - 4

     = 65 - 4

MP = 61

MN = x - 1

      = 13 - 1

MN = 12

NP = 9x - 68

     = 9(13) - 68

     = 117 - 68

NP = 49

Therefore, the appropriate value of x is 13.

Learn more about line segment at https://brainly.com/question/27681838

#SPJ1

The correct question is:

Range of x-values: 6. MN = x - 1, NP = 9x - 68, MP = 5x - 4.

Answer:

2

Step-by-step explanation:

We use complex conjugates. A complex number multiplied by its conjugate creates a difference of squares pattern. In this scenario, 3-2i’s conjugate is 3+2i, because (3-2i)(3+2i)=9-(-4)=13. So how do we use conjugates to simplify this expression? We first multiply by [tex]\frac{3+2i}{3+2i}[/tex] to make the denominator real, while keeping the fraction the same, because the fraction we multiplied is 1.
our new fraction is (8-i)(3+2i)/13.

Expand the numerator: (26+13i)/13 = 2+i, so a is 2

Ramona's mistake was in substituting the value of 8.5 for the wrong variable, which led her to obtain a nonsensical answer of -17.52 inches for the man's height.

Based on the given information, Ramona made a mistake in substituting the wrong variable. It is unclear what the original equation was, but it seems that Ramona was trying to solve for the height of a man based on some given variables.

Ramona's mistake was in substituting the value of 8.5 for the wrong variable, which led her to obtain a nonsensical answer of -17.52 inches for the man's height. Additionally, the solution of -17.52 should not represent the man's height, but rather some other variable in the equation.

The correct approach would have been to carefully substitute the given values for the correct variables and then solve for the unknown variable. In this case, it appears that Ramona should have added 0.444 and 8.5, rather than substituting 8.5 for the wrong variable. It is also worth noting that the resulting value for y should be positive, since negative shoe sizes do not make sense.

For more such questions on variables

https://brainly.com/question/25223322

#SPJ4

The sequence type is a recursive function and the first five terms cannot be determined from the formula

From the question, we have the following parameters that can be used in our computation:

a(n-2)ᵃ⁽ⁿ ⁻ ¹⁾ + 1 where a1 = 3

The formula a(n-2)ᵃ⁽ⁿ ⁻ ¹⁾ + 1 is recursive because it defines the nth term in terms of the two previous terms a(n-2) and a(n-1).

To find the first five terms of the sequence, we can use the initial value a1=3 and the recursive formula.

So, we have

a1 = 3

a2 = a(0)ᵃ¹

The second term cannot be calculated because we do not have a(0)

This means that other terms cannot be calculated with the formula

Read more about sequence at

https://brainly.com/question/7882626

#SPJ1

Therefore , the solution of the given problem of arithmetic comes out to be 32 is the 9th term in the series.

The values of a list are added up to obtain its average values, also referred to as the company's values, which are then scaled by the number of list elements in the highest population. In math, similar growth trends can be observed. The mean of the real numbers 5, 7, as well as 9, is 4, and also the number 21 enhanced by three (there are presently several three numbers) equals seven.

Here,

The following formula can be used to describe the nth term of an arithmetic sequence:

=> a = a1 + (n-1)d

where the term number is n, d is the common difference, and a1 is the first term.

A1 = 28 in this instance, and d = 1/2. By adding n = 9 to the calculation and simplifying, we can determine the ninth term:

=> a9 = a1 + (9-1)d

=> a9 = 28 + 8(1/2)

=> a9 = 28 + 4

=> a9 = 32

Consequently, 32 is the 9th term in the series.

To know more about arithmetic mean  , visit

brainly.com/question/13000783

#SPJ1

The average rate of change is $22.50 per class

The table of values represent the given parameter

The average rate of change is calculated as

Rate = Change in T(c)/Corresponding change in c

So, we have

Rate = (50 - 27.50)/(2 - 1)

Rate = 22.50

We start by calculating the function from

T(c) = mc + b

Where

m = Rate = 22.50

So, we have

T(c) = 22.5c + b

Using the points, we have

22.5 * 1 + b = 27.50

So, we have

b = 5

So, we have

T(c) = 22.5c + 5

For 5 classes, we have

T(5) = 22.5 * 5 + 5

T(5) = 117.5

The first class is 27.50 because the studio charges a registration fee of $5

Read more about linear function at

https://brainly.com/question/4025726

#SPJ1

The given statement is false. A pooled model will produce biased coefficient estimates when factors in the error term are not correlated with the independent variable.

A pooled model is a method that entails the estimation of regression coefficients over different groups or periods by pooling the data from those groups or periods. When a pooled model is used, the dataset is combined from different groups and treated as one group, making it a more significant dataset. It is a statistical approach that includes data from two or more groups to examine variables in a wider context.

A pooled model is used when all groups have the same coefficient estimates and the same variance. It is a helpful technique for identifying variables that influence an outcome over time, as it examines changes that occur over different periods.

The assumptions of a pooled model are:

Hence, the given statement is false.

To know more about the "independent variable": https://brainly.com/question/82796

#SPJ11

The difference in the distance of the route of the two mountaineers to reach the meeting point is approximately 311.67m.

To solve this problem, we need to find the total distance each mountaineer traveled to reach the meeting point. Then we can compare the two distances to find the difference.

Let's start with José's route. We can use the Pythagorean theorem to find the total distance he traveled:

total distance = √(365² + 584²) ≈ 694.36m

Now let's find the total distance for Damián's route. Again, we can use the Pythagorean theorem to find the distance he walked on the ground:

distance on the ground = √208² + (584 - 465)² = √208² + 119² ≈ 236.98m

And we can add the distance he ascended:

total distance = 236.98m + 465m = 701.98m

Finally, we can find the difference in distance between the two routes:

difference = 701.98m - 694.36m ≈ 7.62m

Therefore, there is a difference of approximately 7.62 meters between the route of the two mountaineers to reach the meeting point.

Learn more about the distance at

https://brainly.com/question/15172156

#SPJ4

The question is -

José and Damián are mountaineers, each of them has taken a different path to climb a mountain. José walks straight for 365m and climbs 584m, while Damián climbs 465m and walks straight for 208m to reach the meeting point. How many meters of difference are there in the path taken by the two mountaineers to reach the meeting point?

 It is possible that the observed proportion of 0.46 is due to chance, and the true proportion is actually 0.5.

What is Algebraic expression ?

Algebraic expression can be defined as combination of variables and constants.

which the penny stack will land on its edge.

To test the hypotheses, the student can use a two-sided z-test for proportions. The test statistic is calculated as:

z = (p' - p) / sqrt(p * (1 - p) / n),

where p' is the sample proportion (46/100), p is the hypothesized proportion (0.5), and n is the sample size (100).

Substituting the values, we get:

z = (0.46 - 0.5) / sqrt(0.5 * 0.5 / 100) = -0.8

Using a significance level of 0.05 (i.e., a 95% confidence level), the critical values for a two-sided test are -1.96 and 1.96.

Since the calculated z-score (-0.8) falls between the critical values, we fail to reject the null hypothesis and conclude that there is not enough evidence to suggest that the true proportion of flips for which the penny stack will land on its edge differs from 0.5.

In other words, the data does not provide convincing evidence that the student's claim is true.

Therefore,  It is possible that the observed proportion of 0.46 is due to chance, and the true proportion is actually 0.5.

To learn more about Algebraic expression from given link.

brainly.com/question/953809

#SPJ1

The probability of a randomly selected timber stand having more than 92 trees is 0.0744 or 7.44%.

Managed timber stands average 150 trees per acre with a standard deviation of 40. Assume acres are normally distributed.To find the probability of a randomly selected timber stand having more than 92 trees.We have to calculate the Z-Score using the formula,Z= (X-μ)/ σWhere X= 92 treesμ = 150 treesσ= 40Using the formulaZ= (X-μ)/ σZ= (92-150)/40= -1.45We know that the area under the normal distribution curve is 1. To find the probability of a random variable that falls between two points, we need to find the area between those points.A normal distribution curve is shown below:To find the probability of a randomly selected timber stand having more than 92 trees, we need to find the area to the right of Z= -1.45 using a normal distribution table. The probability is 0.0744 or 7.44%.Therefore, the probability of a randomly selected timber stand having more than 92 trees is 0.0744 or 7.44%.

Learn more about Timber Stands

brainly.com/question/14702478

#SPJ11

Answer:

To find the percent sales tax, we can use the following formula:

Percent tax = (Tax amount ÷ Base price) × 100%

Where "Base price" is the original price of the item before tax is added.

In this case, the base price of the sneakers is $22, and the total price with tax is $23.98. The tax amount is:

Tax amount = Total price - Base price

Tax amount = $23.98 - $22

Tax amount = $1.98

Now we can calculate the percent sales tax:

Percent tax = (Tax amount ÷ Base price) × 100%

Percent tax = ($1.98 ÷ $22) × 100%

Percent tax = 0.09 × 100%

Percent tax = 9%

Therefore, the percent sales tax is 9%.