Explanation:
Nettl's analysis of the Soviet Union and technology is significantly different from Graham's argument. Nettl emphasizes the limitations of Soviet technology and its inability to keep up with the West. He argues that despite Soviet propaganda, the country lagged behind the West in several key areas, including computers and microelectronics. Nettl suggests that the Soviet Union's centralized economic system hindered technological progress, as the government was unable to allocate resources efficiently and lacked the incentives for innovation and efficiency that existed in the West.
In contrast, Graham argues that the Soviet Union was able to achieve technological progress in certain areas, such as space exploration and nuclear technology, due to its centralized planning and strong government support. He suggests that the Soviet Union's achievements in these areas were a result of the country's ability to mobilize resources for specific goals and its willingness to invest heavily in technology.
While both Nettl and Graham acknowledge the role of the Soviet government in technological progress, their views on the effectiveness of Soviet central planning and government support are significantly different. Nettl's analysis emphasizes the limitations of Soviet technology and the inefficiencies of central planning, while Graham's argument highlights the potential benefits of strong government support for technological innovation.
Overall, Nettl's analysis is more critical of Soviet technology and its limitations, while Graham's argument is more optimistic about the potential for central planning and government support to drive technological progress.
What was one of the primary reasons that the economy was weak when Nixon took office?
A. Oil embargos made production costs skyrocket
B. The Vietnam War had been a huge expense
C. Low tax rates meant no money was coming in
D. Nuclear development took up most of the budget
Answer:
c
Explanation:
Nixon Shock refers to the economic actions taken by President Richard Nixon in 1971 that eventually led to the collapse of the Bretton Woods system.
how did the idea of Supreme Court get around?
Answer:
The idea of a Supreme Court as the highest court in the land, with the power of judicial review, was then enshrined in the United States Constitution. Article III of the Constitution established the Supreme Court and granted it the power to hear cases arising under the Constitution, federal law, and disputes between states.
Over time, the idea of a Supreme Court has been adopted by many other countries around the world, often as part of a system of checks and balances to ensure that no one branch of government becomes too powerful. Today, most democratic countries have some form of a Supreme Court or constitutional court to interpret their laws and ensure that they are consistent with their respective constitutions.
Which statement describes the importance of Daniel Ellsberg to the Vietnam era
For the American people to be aware of all that the company did in during Vietnam War, Daniel Ellsberg was crucial. A covert report on American involvement in Vietnam was written by Ellsberg and given to the New York Times. Ellsberg left for home confident that the Wars had been a mistake.
What is Daniel Ellsberg's significance?Robert McNamara's confidential assessment on the Vietnam War, that had become notorious as the Pentagon Papers, included Daniel Ellsberg as an analyst.
What is Daniel Ellsberg's significance?Robert McNamara's confidential assessment on the Vietnam War, that had become notorious as the Pentagon Papers, included Daniel Ellsberg as an analyst.
TO know more about Vietnam War Visit:
https://brainly.com/question/11375126
#SPJ1
3.What did Justinian I contribute to the development of written law?
A.brought the Napoleonic Code to France
B.simplified Roman law
C.carved laws into a large stone pillar
D.popularized English common law
Answer:
B.
Explanation:
He combined all old roman laws into a big book with them all together
Why do you think U.S. Secretary of State John Hay called this conflict a “splendid little war?” (HINT: How did the U.S. benefit from the Spanish-American War?)
The Spanish-American War was dubbed the "splendid little conflict" by Secretary of State John Hay. It was short—only a few months long—and relatively bloodless because the US lost more soldiers to illness than to hostilities.
What benefits did the US receive as a result of the Spanish-American War?Representatives from Spain and the United States signed a peace agreement in Paris on December 10, 1898, recognizing Cuba's independence, transferring Puerto Rico and Guam to the United States, and allowing the winner to pay $20 million to Spain to purchase the Philippines Islands.
The Spanish were compelled to surrender their claims to Cuba as a result of the United States' victory in the war, and to cede control of Guam, Puerto Rico, and the Philippines to the Americans. Hawaii, an autonomous state, was also annexed by the US during the conflict.
Learn more about Spanish-American War: https://brainly.com/question/2827989
#SPJ1
1. For what reasons does Demaratus think the Spartans will fight so hard to resist Xerxes?
2. What does this passage reveal concerning Herodotus's attitude toward the Greeks? Toward the Persians?
Demaratus' response: Spartans would fight to the death even when much outnumbered; Greece is impoverished. Xerxes is pessimistic that the Greeks would be able to compete with his greater numbers.
What did the Greeks become famous for?Significant advancements were made by the Greeks in astronomy, math, philosophy, even medicine. Greek culture gave literature and theater a high priority, which influenced modern plays. Greek architecture and art are well renowned for their elaborate designs.
What do you call Greeks?As opposed to this, Greeks call themselves "v"—Hellenes. The word "Greek" is derived from the Latin "Graeci," and thanks to Roman influence, it has come to be used in most languages to refer to Greek people and culture. Yet, "Greek" and "Hellenic" are also used in English.
To know more about Greeks visit:
https://brainly.com/question/18798633
#SPJ1
How did the Versailles treaty help cause ww2?
Be sure to give me:
-A claim that answers the question
-Evidence (a direct quote or data) from one source that supports this claim
-Reasoning explaining how this evidence supports your claim
-Evidence (a direct quote or data) from a second source that supports this claim
-Reasoning explaining how this evidence supports your claim.
Answer:
Claim: The Versailles Treaty helped cause World War II by punishing Germany with harsh reparations, territorial losses, and military limitations that fueled resentment and instability.
Evidence from Source 1 (History.com): "The Treaty of Versailles punished Germany with massive territorial losses, military restrictions, economic reparations, and a guilty verdict that led to political turmoil and resentment."
Reasoning: The treaty's harsh terms left Germany humiliated and economically devastated, fueling anger and frustration among Germans who saw the treaty as unfair and punitive. This resentment led to political instability and the rise of extremist parties, such as the Nazi Party, who capitalized on the public's anger and promised to restore Germany's power and prestige.
Evidence from Source 2 (Britannica): "The Treaty of Versailles, by imposing punitive territorial, military, and economic provisions on Germany, laid the groundwork for the rise of fascist leader Adolf Hitler and the outbreak of World War II."
Reasoning: The treaty's punitive measures undermined Germany's fragile democracy and allowed extremist groups, such as the Nazi Party, to gain power and support. Hitler, who rose to power in part by exploiting the public's anger over the treaty, used Germany's economic and political instability to justify his aggressive foreign policy and eventual invasion of neighboring countries.
Answer:
Claim: The Versailles Treaty helped cause World War II.
Evidence from source 1: "The Treaty of Versailles, which ended World War I, was drafted to prevent future wars by making Germany pay for the damage it had caused. The treaty, however, ended up creating resentment and economic problems in Germany that eventually led to the rise of Adolf Hitler and the start of World War II." (History.com, "Treaty of Versailles")
Reasoning: This evidence supports the claim that the Versailles Treaty helped cause World War II by showing that the treaty created conditions in Germany that were conducive to the rise of Hitler and the Nazi party, who ultimately started the war. The economic burdens placed on Germany by the treaty caused significant unrest and instability, which Hitler was able to exploit to gain power.
Evidence from source 2: "The Treaty of Versailles was a harsh treaty that required Germany to pay for the damages caused by the war, give up land and disarmament, and accept full responsibility for starting the war. The German people felt humiliated and resentful, which made them more susceptible to the propaganda of extremist political groups." (The National WWII Museum, "Treaty of Versailles")
Reasoning: This evidence supports the claim that the Versailles Treaty helped cause World War II by demonstrating that the treaty created a sense of humiliation and resentment in Germany that made the population more receptive to extremist political ideologies. The harsh terms of the treaty made the German people feel unfairly punished and contributed to a sense of nationalism that Hitler and other extremist groups were able to exploit.
Overall, these sources show that the Versailles Treaty played a significant role in creating the conditions that led to World War II. The treaty's harsh terms and economic burdens created resentment and instability in Germany, which Hitler and other extremist groups were able to exploit to gain power and ultimately start the war.
Most of the work in Congress is done by breaking up into these groups that specialize in different
areas of policies and lawmaking:
The House and Senate's legislative committees carry out the bulk of the actual work of Congress. The most influence rests with those committee chairs.
Why does most of the work in Congress get done in committees?The committee system helps the Senate and House of Representatives operate more effectively. Lawmakers are not expected to be experts in every topic. As a result, the Senate and House of Representatives established committees with a variety of specializations.
What obligation falls under a member of Congress the most?The members of the US Congress act as representatives for their constituents by holding hearings, proposing legislation, and participating in voting. Before being forwarded to the President for his signature, all bills must first receive approval from Congress.
Learn more about US Congress: https://brainly.com/question/12695227
#SPJ9
When did War War One start
Answer:
July 28, 1914
Explanation:
Answer: July 1914 to November 11, 1918.
Explanation: I think your talking about World War One ...
When the Ottoman Empire weakened, Europe reacted by
building a canal for trade with the Ottoman region.
helping Ottoman nations achieve independence.
cutting off most trade with the Ottoman region.
trying to take more control of Ottoman lands.
Answer:
trying to take more control of Ottoman lands.
pls mrk me brainliest
The Nuremberg laws defined who was considered ?
The Nazi government was known for using violence to enforce its racial ideologies,but it also made sure to pass laws that legalized discrimination practices.
The Nuremberg Laws were anti-Semitic and racist laws that were promulgated in Nazi Germany on September 15, 1935, at a special meeting of the Reichstag two measures based on race Laws issued on September 15, 1935, personally approved by Hitler,deprived Jews of German citizenship, prohibited Jewish households from having German maids. The Nazi government was known for using violence to enforce its racial ideologies,but it also made sure to pass laws that legalized discriminatory practices.In 1935,when the Nuremberg Laws were passed, the Nazi party successfully consolidated its power and appointed Adolf Hitler Führer, or leader.
To learn more about Nuremberg Laws please click on below link.
https://brainly.com/question/9286721.
#SPJ1
What does Washington believe is one of the main pillars of government?
Answer: Washington remained above the fray; he wanted to be a president of all American citizens. The most important reason was he believed unity, not division, was necessary for a democratic republic to survive. Washington believed that political parties would divide and destroy the young United States.
Explanation:
How did some Americans turn their wartime experiences into lasting personal gains (i.e. better employment, a new home, or an education) after the war was over?
ANSWER THIS QUESTION< PLEASE! Why did others miss out on these opportunities?
The answer is Americans turn their wartime experiences into lasting personal gains after the war was over.
The reasons were- After WWII, veterans of wars receive compensation from the government.
They were supported by the government to support themselves.Veterans got opportunities to get education by getting tuition fees at vocational schools and colleges.The economy was more improved in the 1940 and 50s.The other veterans missed this opportunity because they were traumatized after the war and most of them were dead.
What does the military mean when they talk about war?A war is a armed struggle that has nations, governments, society, or paramilitary organizations like mercenaries, insurgents, and militias.
What distinguishes it from invasion?A war can start because of an invasion, it can be ended by using it as bigger strategy, or it can start as a result of the invasion. Invasions are large-scale operations that require military resources and intricate preparation. They also have a good influence on the target region.
To know more about War visit:
https://brainly.com/question/3445478
#SPJ1
What was one economic difference between the Middle and New
England colonies?
The Middle colonies did not allow African slavery,
The New England colonies relied on subsistence farming
The Middle colonies developed a shipbuilding industry.
The New England colonies built large plantations,
Answer:
It's C.
Explanation:
C. The Middle colonies developed a shipbuilding industry is the economic difference between the Middle and New England colonies. The Middle colonies, which included New York, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, and Delaware, had a strong economy based on agriculture, trade, and manufacturing. The Middle colonies had access to natural resources such as iron, coal, and timber, which allowed them to develop a shipbuilding industry. This industry was a major source of employment and revenue for the Middle colonies. In contrast, the New England colonies, which included Massachusetts, Connecticut, Rhode Island, and New Hampshire, had a primarily agricultural economy that relied on subsistence farming and fishing. While there were some shipbuilding activities in New England, it was not as significant as in the Middle colonies.
Hope this helps! If not, sorry! If you need more help, you may ask me! :]
Advise your friend on how to effectively deal with stress resulting from failing a grade
Answer:
Explanation:
"Everyone fails at some point. Plenty of other people in our class are in the same position as you, and I know that you will all get through it." "Let me know how you're feeling, I'm here to listen for as long as you need me." "Let's take your mind off of things for a little bit and go for a walk."
What happened in 2014 that made the ongoing civil war in Syria even more complicated?
A.
The Arab Spring led to demonstrations in Syria.
B.
The Assad government used chemical weapons.
C.
ISIS launched an attack on Syria.
D.
The United States attacked a Syrian air base.
ANSWER NEEDED ASAP!!!
What factor led to the rise of the Kingdom of Kush?
Archery was invented.
Meroe became the capital.
Napata became independent.
Kushi tes traded more with their neighbors.
Answer:
Explanation:
The factor that led to the rise of the Kingdom of Kush was "Napata became independent."
Would the United States be a better nation if the citizens, rather than their elected
representatives, had more political power? How did the Progressive movement change
the relationship between government officials and their constituents?
The elected representatives of of the citizens of the USA are the voices of the citizens itself. Naturally, increasing citizen's power would help to reduce corruptions caused by politicians to make the nation better.
On the above-mentioned note, the Progressive movement of the USA, of 20th Century helped the citizens of the USA to get fair judgment in the fields of; domestic policies development, maintaining trusts with the governance, regulation of thresholds and transports, food, and drugs.
Hence it can be concluded, as per the Progressive movement of the USA, giving proportional power to citizens would help to make the nation a better example to curb political corruption.
To know more about the Progressive movement of the USA:
brainly.com/question/9369850
brainly.com/question/17104960
Imagine that the following situations have occurred in your community following the disaster. Select two of the following situations to address and evaluate in your email:
teen writing email
© 2012 BananaStock/Thinkstock
The government suspended the right of habeas corpus (the right to see a judge after arrest to determine if imprisonment is lawful).
The government forced people to evacuate from their homes.
The press accessed the disaster area and published a story in a national newspaper about the event.
The government allowed federal and state troops to be quartered in private residences to assist residents and protect order.
Citizens were denied the right to bring legally owned firearms to storm shelters.
The government made certain dangerous areas off-limits, which prevented residents from accessing their homes and personal property.
Prisoners were kept in prisons that lacked power, supplies, and plumbing during the emergency.
The federal and state courts postponed scheduled criminal and civil trials due to the emergency.
The government prevented the press from publishing graphic photos of victims of the natural disaster to protect the privacy of the victim’s family.
The federal government stated that local and state governments are solely responsible for the disaster recovery efforts and that it will not be providing assistance.
Once you have chosen the concerns you wish to address, compose a well-written response to each situation with the following information:
the Constitutional amendment that relates to the situation
arguments that could be made for or against the action that took place
your position on the situation and the reasons you think officials should agree with you
Save your email and check it for spelling and grammar.
Answer:
Dear [Name],
I hope this email finds you well. I wanted to reach out to you regarding some of the recent developments in our community following the natural disaster that occurred. Specifically, I am concerned about two situations that have arisen and would like to discuss them with you.
The first situation I would like to address is the government's suspension of the right of habeas corpus. As you may know, this right guarantees that individuals have the ability to see a judge after an arrest to determine if their imprisonment is lawful. This is protected by the Fifth Amendment. While I understand that the government may have felt this was necessary to maintain order in the immediate aftermath of the disaster, I believe that this is a dangerous precedent to set. Suspending the right of habeas corpus is a direct violation of our Constitutional protections and undermines the very foundations of our democracy. It is crucial that we uphold these protections even in times of crisis.
The second situation that concerns me is the government's decision to force people to evacuate from their homes. This action could be seen as a violation of the Third Amendment, which prohibits the government from quartering troops in private residences without the owner's consent. While I understand that the government may have felt that this was necessary to ensure the safety of the residents and protect order, I believe that there were other options available. Instead of forcing residents to leave their homes, the government could have worked with local law enforcement to ensure that order was maintained in the area. In addition, the government could have provided alternative shelters for those who were unable to remain in their homes.
Overall, I believe that it is crucial that we protect our Constitutional rights and uphold our democratic values, even in times of crisis. While it may be tempting to make exceptions in the face of danger, we must remember that our rights and values are what make our country great. Thank you for taking the time to read my concerns, and I hope that we can work together to ensure that our community remains a safe and free place to live.
Sincerely,
[Your Name]
[For the second situation, replace the first paragraph with the following:]
The second situation that concerns me is the government's decision to prevent citizens from bringing legally owned firearms to storm shelters. This action could be seen as a violation of the Second Amendment, which protects the right to bear arms. While I understand that the government may have felt that this was necessary to ensure the safety of those in the shelters, I believe that it is crucial that we protect our Second Amendment rights. By preventing citizens from bringing legally owned firearms to the shelters, the government is denying them the ability to protect themselves and their families in a dangerous situation. Instead, the government could have implemented safety measures to ensure that firearms were not used improperly in the shelters.
Explanation:
All
1) If cost-benefit consequentialism is the ethic of capitalism, is there a way to save it from itself? that is, these two, seem to justify selfishness by drawing th
circle of who counts tightly around myself. Is that even ethical? If not, which other ethic should our economy be guided by?
2) Mill thinks some pleasures are better pleasures than other pleasures. Is this true? Explain, and give an example
1. Other ethics that could be used are virtue ethics, deontological ethics.
2. Some pleasures have more quality than others, and are therefore better.
The Ethics Cost-benefit consequentialism is not necessarily the exclusive ethic of capitalism, but it is often associated with it. This approach to ethics focuses on the outcomes or consequences of actions and seeks to maximize the benefits while minimizing the costs. While this approach can provide some benefits, it can also lead to a narrow focus on self-interest and short-term gains at the expense of others and the environment.To address this, alternative ethical frameworks such as virtue ethics or deontological ethics can be used to guide economic decisions.
Virtue ethics emphasizes the development of moral character and emphasizes the importance of virtues such as compassion, fairness, and responsibility.
Deontological ethics emphasizes adherence to moral rules and duties, regardless of the consequences. These alternative frameworks may provide a broader perspective on economic decision-making that takes into account the well-being of all stakeholders, including the environment and future generations.
Mill believed that some pleasures are better than others based on their quality, not just their quantity. He argued that intellectual or higher pleasures, such as the enjoyment of art, literature, or philosophy, are superior to lower pleasures, such as physical pleasures like eating, drinking, or sex. Mill believed that higher pleasures are more valuable because they require a greater level of development, education, and sophistication to appreciate.This view is controversial and has been criticized for being elitist and paternalistic. Some argue that pleasure is subjective and that it is not possible to make objective distinctions between higher and lower pleasures. Others argue that pleasure should not be the only consideration in ethical decision-making and that other factors such as justice, fairness, and equality should also be taken into account. Ultimately, whether some pleasures are better than others is a matter of debate and depends on individual perspectives and values.
Learn more about ethics here https://brainly.com/question/13969108
The Supreme Court’s Plessy v. Ferguson decision ruled that Louisiana’s Separate Car Act
The Supreme Court's case on Plessy v. Ferguson ruled that Louisiana's state Separate Car Act B. helped maintain public peace and good order.
The court's decision allowed for equal but separate accommodations for white and colored races.
What is Plessy v. Ferguson case?Plessy v. Ferguson case started when Homer Plessy who was of mixed race, boarded a train car for whites-only in New Orleans, violating Louisiana's Separate Car Act of 1890 which stipulated equal but separate railroad accommodations for whites and colored passengers.
Plessy was charged under Louisiana's Separate Car Act but his lawyers claimed that the case should be dismissed on the grounds that the Act was unconstitutional which judge John H. Ferguson denied.
Then Plessy appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court. However, the court decided that racial segregation laws did not violate the U.S. Constitution in so far as the accommodations for each race were equal in quality.
Thus, the court case of Plessy v. Ferguson pronounced that Louisiana's state Separate Car Act helped maintain public peace and good order.
Learn more about Louisiana's Separate Car Act of 1890 at brainly.com/question/1403520.
#SPJ1
Question completion:
I think part of your question is missing, you might be referring to this full question:
The Supreme Court’s Plessy v. Ferguson decision ruled that Louisiana’s Separate Car Act
A. promoted unconstitutional segregation.
B. helped maintain public peace and good order.
C. did not constitute segregation.
D. was required under the Fourteenth Amendment
discuss three ways people decide how to vote. There are several methods or influences listed, pick three and discuss how they impact voters.
The three ways people decide how to vote is through:
Political IdeologyPersonal Characteristics of the CandidateParty AffiliationWhat are the discusion on how they impact voters?There are many different factors that can influence how people decide to vote in elections. Here are three common ways that people often make decisions about who to vote for:
Political Ideology: One of the most important factors that can influence how people vote is their political ideology. This refers to a set of beliefs and values that individuals hold about the role of government, the economy, social issues, and other political issues. People who identify as conservative, for example, may prioritize individual rights, limited government, and a free market economy.
Personal Characteristics of the Candidate: Another factor that can influence voting decisions is the personal characteristics of the candidates themselves. For example, voters may consider a candidate's experience, leadership skills, communication abilities, or personal charisma.
Party Affiliation: Many people base their voting decisions on their party affiliation. This means that they support candidates who are members of the same political party that they belong to. Party affiliation can be influenced by many factors, such as family upbringing, personal values, or geographic location.
Learn more about vote at:
https://brainly.com/question/21910013
#SPJ1
Describe the growth of the first party system in the United States
From about 1792 and 1824, the United States had a political party structure known as the First Party System. It included two national parties vying for power in the states, the federal government, and the president.
What does becoming president mean?The office of president of the U.S. also: the American governmental institution encompassing the office of president and other accompanying administrative and policy-making agencies.: the term during which a president occupies office. 3.: the conduct or duties of the presider.
What does it mean to be in the presidency?
He has declared that he's running for office, which is the duty of being president in general. She easily defeated her rival for the presidency. There are now just two leading contenders for the presidency.
To know more about presidency visit:
https://brainly.com/question/14008034
#SPJ1
Examine the scenario below. Determine the goal the responding international agency is trying to achieve if they intervene in this issue.
Two European countries are at war, and are using their navies to attack one another in an area in which cruise ships frequently travel. NATO has decided to intervene, to help protect the cruise passengers from being attacked.
Human Rights
Spread Democracy
National Security
Economic Growth
The goal the responding international agency is trying to achieve in this scenario is National Security.
What is National security?National security is the government wants to protect society from disruption caused by a disaster or crisis. It examines threats, their prevention and disaster response through its National Security Strategy.
NATO's decision to intervene in the conflict between two European countries in order to protect cruise passengers from being attacked suggests that the agency's primary objective is to ensure the safety and security of civilians and to prevent the escalation of violence in the region.
This is consistent with the goal of national security, which involves protecting a country's citizens and interests from internal and external threats. By intervening in the conflict, NATO is seeking to promote stability and security in the region and to prevent the conflict from spilling over into other areas or causing wider instability.
Learn more about National Security at:https://brainly.com/question/29553303
#SPJ1
Who was smarter Albert Einstein or Benjamin Franklin?
When the Ottoman Empire weakened, Europe reacted by
building a canal for trade with the Ottoman region.
helping Ottoman nations achieve independence.
cutting off most trade with the Ottoman region.
trying to take more control of Ottoman lands.
When the Ottoman Empire weakened, Europe reacted by trying to take more control of Ottoman lands. Last option is correct
What did the Europeans do to the empire?European powers saw the weakening Ottoman Empire as an opportunity to expand their own influence in the region. This led to a period of imperialism and colonization, with European powers carving up the Ottoman Empire into spheres of influence and colonies.
The construction of a canal for trade with the Ottoman region (referring to the Suez Canal) occurred after this period of European colonization, as a means to facilitate trade and transportation between Europe and Asia. The idea of helping Ottoman nations achieve independence did not become a significant factor until later, as nationalist movements began to take root within the Ottoman Empire itself.
Read more on Ottomans here:https://brainly.com/question/788257
#SPJ1
Answer:
trying to take more control of Ottoman lands.
Explanation:
i took the test
What are the achievements made by the Khulfa-e-Rashideen
Answer:
The Rashidun were also responsible for the adoption of an Islamic calendar, dating from Muhammad's emigration (Hijrah) from Mecca to Medina (622), and the establishment of an authoritative reading of the Qurʾān, which strengthened the Muslim community and encouraged religious scholarship.
Why did the House Un-American Activities Committee investigate Hollywood?
O to establish higher quality standards for new films
O to end racial discrimination in the casting of movies
O to uncover communist influences in the film industry
O to eliminate corruption and graft among movie executives
Help…
The House Un-American Activities Committee (HUAC) investigated Hollywood to uncover communist influences in the film industry. Therefore, option C is the correct answer. In the 1940s and 1950s, the HUAC was concerned about the perceived spread of communism in the United States, and they believed that Hollywood was a hotbed of communist sympathizers who were using films to spread their ideology. As a result, the committee conducted investigations and hearings to identify and punish individuals suspected of being associated with communism, including many Hollywood actors, writers, and directors.
Which of the following attributes of McDonalds has contributed to its success?
The company discourages people from owning multiple franchises.
It focuses on quality, simplicity, and efficiency.
It has limited franchising opportunities to the U.S. only.
The company does not focus on building relationships with suppliers.
Answer:
It focuses on quality, simplicity, and efficiency.
What americas diplomatic approach to the squabble over China ?
Answer: Our competitive approach to the PRC has two objectives: first, to improve the resiliency of our institutions, alliances, and partnerships to prevail against the challenges the PRC presents; and second, to compel Beijing to cease or reduce actions harmful to the United States' vital, national interests and those of our ...