HELP QUICKLY PLEASE! 10+ POINTS!
Explain Descartes,' "Cogito, Ergo Sum." Describe some of the objections.

The U.S. is discouraged from placing tariffs on foreign products to protect companies that manufacture similar goods in the U.S. World Trade Organization affect the U.S.

Option B is correct.

The WTO has made India's export competitiveness better. The lower tax has coordinated with the worldwide economy all the more productively. Technology and ideas have been transferred and exchanged in order to advance India's growth and development. Due to market access, costs and time are reduced.

To put it succinctly, the only international organization that deals with global trade regulations is the World Trade Organization (WTO). Its primary function is to guarantee that trade proceeds freely, predictably, and without incident.

Learn more about World Trade Organisation:

brainly.com/question/13903089

#SPJ1

Bolivar believed that South Americans were not ready for a republican government due to several reasons.

He feared that the Spanish might do no better than the serfs that have to work for free.

Firstly, he believed that the people were not sufficiently educated or politically mature to understand the complexities of a republican system of government.

Secondly, Bolivar was concerned about the lack of infrastructure and institutions necessary for a functioning democratic government.

He believed that these would need to be established before a republic could be successful.

Finally, Bolivar was aware of the regional and cultural differences across South America, which he believed could undermine the stability of a republic.

For these reasons, Bolivar favored a centralized government led by a strong executive to ensure stability and progress.

Read more about Simon Bolivar here:

https://brainly.com/question/7670428

#SPJ1

Answer:

Explanation:

the most likely interpretation of the statement "the soup tasted like corpses" is that the person thinks the soup tastes bad and can't think of another description. This is a common use of hyperbole or exaggerated language to express a strong negative opinion or distaste for something. The comparison to corpses suggests that the taste was unpleasant or even repulsive, but it does not necessarily imply a deeper meaning such as a connection to death or hopelessness.

Answer:

the soup tast like a dead body

The Articles of Confederation created a weak central government because they intentionally limited the powers of the federal government. The Articles established a "firm league of friendship" among the states, but it did not provide for a strong executive branch or a judiciary branch to enforce laws. The government under the Articles consisted of only a single legislative body, the Congress, which had limited authority to raise revenue, regulate trade, and make laws. Additionally, the Articles required unanimous consent from all 13 states to make changes to the document, making it difficult to pass any significant legislation or amendments.

The lack of a strong central government made it difficult to address important issues facing the nation, such as economic instability, interstate commerce disputes, and foreign relations. The government could not regulate trade or impose taxes, which led to economic chaos and trade disputes among the states. The states were also unable to provide a united front in negotiations with foreign countries, leaving them vulnerable to exploitation. These weaknesses eventually led to the drafting of the United States Constitution, which established a stronger federal government with more robust powers to address the challenges facing the new nation.

Brainliest appreciated  (:

Explanation:

The Articles of Confederation led to a weak central government since it gave most of the power to the states, rather than to the federal government.

The federal government had limited authority to regulate trade, collect taxes, and enforce laws. There was no executive branch to enforce laws or a judiciary branch to interpret them. The federal government was unable to properly govern the country, and it was difficult for the states to work together on issues of national importance.

The Renaissance, Protestant Reformation, Scientific Revolution, and Enlightenment are four significant cultural movements that were influenced by these fresh viewpoints. The world was revolutionized by these intellectual and expressional revolutions.

To lrearn more about Scientific Revolution, refer to:

https://brainly.com/question/14231443

One of the key goals of the Progressive Period movement was to remove corruption in government. They made it a point to emphasize family, education, and many other critical factors that are still reinforced today.

Which is less expensive, Geico or Progressive?

Both Geico and Progressive provide cheaper average premiums on plans for drivers and homeowners, but if price is the most important factor, Geico wins. Its average prices are cheaper than Progressive's average rates, and the company's vast discount list may help you save much more. Geico and Progressive outperform State Farm in terms of typical rates, the quantity of discounts available, and customer service. Geico is also one of the top five vehicle insurance providers, along with Travelers, USAA, and Progressive, that are less expensive on average than State Farm.

Know more about government Visit:

https://brainly.com/question/16940043

#SPJ1

Answer:

Explanation:

False.

The Powhatan Indians were a group of indigenous people who lived in Virginia in the 17th century. They were not known for conquering other native tribes or receiving tribute from them. Instead, they were a confederation of tribes that had a complex social and political structure. They were known for their farming, hunting, and fishing skills, and their interactions with the English colonists who arrived in their territory in the early 1600s were marked by both cooperation and conflict.

Answer: Texas ,Delaware,virginia

Explanation:

The US state would you find these three clues in the 1970s/80s/90s TV landscape is Texas. Thus the correct option is B.

Texas served as the backdrop for the television series featuring Junior, Bobby, and Pamela. The TV series "The Waltons" featured the character Junior. The first time Pamela appeared on "Dallas," she played Bobby's wife.

The state's diverse geography, people, and history made it a popular setting for Western plays and other TV programs that needed a rural or southern backdrop to interpret the plot effectively.

Texas has long been a favorite destination for movies and television production, and it played a key role in the TV environment of the 1970s, 1980s, and 1990s.

Therefore, option B is appropriate.

Learn more about Pamela, here:

https://brainly.com/question/1285644

#SPJ2

The complete question is Probably

In which US state would you find these three clues in the 1970s 80s 90s TV landscape: Junior, Bobby, Pamela?

a) New York

b) Texas

c) California

d) Florida

The answer is The given rights in the chart are as follows:

They have the rights to life, a fair trial, freedom from torture and other inhumane treatment, freedom of expression, freedom of religion, and the rights to health, education, and a living standard that is enough.

The freedom of expression, of the press, of religion, and of family life are examples of rights that cannot be legally not given . A privilege is a particular benefit that may be granted and revoked.

To know more about Rights visit:

https://brainly.com/question/11254636

#SPJ1

Answer: C

Explanation: Rural is country, urban is city, suburban is outside of city but still close

Answer:

The answer is C. Reagan was caught secretly selling weapons to Iran

During the Cold War, the US employed a containment strategy to prevent the spread of communism. It was crucial to execute this approach diplomatically. Here are two instances where solitary confinement has been used diplomatically:

Alliance formation: To build alliances with countries that recognized its commitment to containing communism, the United States used diplomacy. The most notable example of this is when NATO, or the North Atlantic Treaty Organization, was established, which was about 1949.

NATO was an alliance of democratic nations led by the United States with the purpose of deterring Soviet aggression. By forging connections with other nations, America was able to contribute to the formation of a coalition to counter the Communist Union's power and halt the spread of communism.

Treaties and agreements were resolved through the diplomatic procedure with said Eastern Bloc and several other communist countries. One of the most significant aspects of this was the Strategic Arms Reduction Talks (SALT) seen between American Usa and the Ussr in the 1970s.

As a result of the SALT discussions, two accords that restrict the number of strategic nuclear weapons which every country may possess were signed. These agreements helped to improve relationship of the two superpowers and lessen the possibility of nuclear conflict.

Diplomatic accords were also used to end conflicts in countries like Korea, Vietnam, and Cuba. In order to implement the Cold War restriction strategy, diplomacy was crucial through the formation of allies.

Learn more about diplomatically here:

https://brainly.com/question/16400773

Answer:

D. Tape recordings of conversations

Explanation:

Russia's agricultural output had returned to pre-World War I levels by the middle of the 1920s. Russia had produced almost 80 million tonnes of grain by 1913. This had decreased to less than 50 million tonnes by 1921.

The Soviet people were able to recover from years of war, civil conflict, and poor governance thanks to the New Economic Policy, which restored some economic stability. NEP guys were the small company owners and managers who prospered at this time.

In an effort to revitalise the Russian economy, the Bolsheviks created the New Economic Policy (NEP) The Bolsheviks' attempt to rebuild the Russian economy following years of War Communism was known as Economic Policy (NEP). In order to ensure that the Red Army had adequate food and resources to win the civil war, war communism served as the country's economic policy from 1918 to 1921.

To know more about World War visit:-

https://brainly.com/question/1449762

#SPJ1

Answer: Mesopotamian city-states were ruled by kings, and all of the people living there were subjects to the king, in a Greek polis, citizens had a say in the governing of the city-state and a king was not welcome. This type of government was unheard of in the ancient world until the Greek Archaic Period.

Explanation: A city-state, or polis, was the community structure of ancient Greece. Each city-state was organized with an urban center and the surrounding countryside. Characteristics of the city in a polis were outer walls for protection, as well as a public space that included temples and government buildings. May 19, 2022

Explanation: The United States remained neutral, as both Federalists and Democratic-Republicans saw that war would lead to economic disaster and the possibility of invasion.

Answer:

government corporations

Explanation:

I think it is government corporations because they can be handled on the private sector.

Answer:

(a) Proposed by Congress: An amendment can be proposed by a two-thirds vote of both the House of Representatives and the Senate.

(b) Proposed by a Constitutional Convention: An amendment can be proposed by a Constitutional Convention called for by two-thirds of state legislatures. However, this method has never been used to date.

After an amendment has been proposed, it must be ratified in one of two ways:

(a) Ratified by the States: An amendment can be ratified by three-fourths of the state legislatures. This is the method used for all current amendments except for the 21st Amendment.

(b) Ratified by Conventions: An amendment can be ratified by conventions in three-fourths of the states. The only amendment that was ratified using this method was the 21st Amendment, which repealed Prohibition in 1933.

Explanation:

Answer: Constitutional monarchy (July 1789 – September 1792)

Explanation: The French Revolution became far more radical than the American Revolution. In addition to a period of extreme public violence, which became known as the Reign of Terror, the French Revolution also attempted to enhance the rights and power of poor people and women.

Before the Revolution

France was a monarchy ruled by the king. The king had total power over the government and the people. The people of France were divided into three social classes called "estates." The First Estate was the clergy, the Second Estate was the nobles, and the Third Estate was the commoners.

Religious practises were outlawed, as were religious organisations.

An international conflict known as a "cold war" is characterised by the lack of an overt military confrontation and the pursuit of goals mostly through economic and political operations, propaganda, espionage, or fights waged through proxy forces.

An international conflict known as a "cold war" is characterised by the lack of an overt military confrontation and the pursuit of goals mostly through economic and political operations, propaganda, espionage, or fights waged through proxy forces. The phrase is most frequently used in reference to the 1947–1991 American–Soviet Cold War.

To know more about religious visit:-

https://brainly.com/question/2033969

#SPJ1

Question:

From One World War to the Next Question 5 of 20

What was one of the major elements of Soviet totalitarianism under Vladimir Lenin?

A. Corporations were given the freedom to operate without government regulation.

B. Soviet children were encouraged to imitate role models from the United States.

C. The Soviet police force was stripped of its power and was unable to maintain order.

D. Religious beliefs were forbidden, and religious organizations were suppressed.

Lincoln reminded his audience that the United States was founded on the values of liberty and equality by using language from the Declaration of Independence.

He recognized a connection between the Civil War sacrifices and the desire for "a fresh birth of freedom" in it, as well as the critical necessity to maintain the Union established in 1776 and its objective of self-government. He also referred to the Declaration of Independence's goals of human equality.

Both the Declaration of Independence and the Gettysburg Address serve as symbols of both the times and the authors who penned them. They serve as a metaphor for the challenges the country was facing at the time and the individuals, Jefferson and Lincoln, who accepted those challenges and came up with solutions on their own.

All men are created equal is the line that Lincoln takes from the Declaration of Independence. The statement "Let Facts be revealed to a candid world" is also included in the Declaration of Independence, but Lincoln omitted it from his Gettysburg Address.

The Gettysburg Address had a more int-imate tone because Lincoln wanted to inspire the populace. By mentioning the gallant troops who took part in the recent combat, Lincoln creates a personal tone. While the Declaration of Independence was written in a formal tone as a political document, the former.

Learn more about the Gettysburg Address: https://brainly.com/question/8178070

#SPJ1

Answer: One possible weakness of Elizabeth Cady Stanton's argument in the Declaration of Sentiments is that it relies heavily on Enlightenment and republican ideals of natural rights, liberty, and equality, which were not universally accepted or applied in her time. For example, the idea of women's suffrage challenged the traditional gender roles and power structures of her era, which were based on patriarchal and hierarchical norms. Some critics might have argued that women were not qualified or responsible enough to participate in politics, or that their interests were already represented by their husbands or fathers.

Another weakness of Stanton's argument could be that it conflates the experiences and aspirations of white, middle-class women with those of all women, ignoring the diversity and complexity of their social, economic, and cultural backgrounds. For instance, women of color, immigrants, and working-class women faced additional barriers and prejudices that were not fully acknowledged or addressed by Stanton and her colleagues. Some critics might have accused her of being elitist, racist, or ethnocentric in her approach to women's rights.

Finally, Stanton's argument might have been criticized for being too radical or utopian, in that it demanded a complete overhaul of the legal and social systems that had been in place for centuries. Some opponents might have argued that such a drastic change would lead to chaos, instability, and moral decay, and that gradual reforms and compromises were more realistic and effective. Others might have accused her of being unpatriotic or anti-Christian, since she challenged the traditional values and institutions that were seen as essential to American identity and morality.

Enjoy and don't become discouraged by the trolls (:

Answer:

Bills passed in the House of Representatives and the Senate may differ due to various reasons. One reason could be the difference in the political composition of the two houses, as each has its own membership and constituency. Additionally, the Senate has different rules and procedures, such as the filibuster, which can make it harder for bills to pass. Another reason could be that the two houses of Congress may have different priorities or perspectives on an issue, leading to differences in the details of proposed legislation. Finally, amendments made by one house to a bill may not be accepted by the other house, leading to further differences between the two versions. Ultimately, bills must go through a process of negotiation and compromise between the two houses before a final version is passed and sent to the President for approval.

A bill passed in the House of Representatives often differs at first from a Senate bill on the same subject due to the differences in the legislative processes and the composition of each chamber.

The U.S. Congress is a bicameral legislature, consisting of two separate chambers: the House of Representatives and the Senate. Each chamber has its own set of rules, procedures, and dynamics, which can lead to variations in the content and language of bills. Here are some reasons why these differences may occur:

1. Representation and Constituencies: The House of Representatives and the Senate represent different constituencies. Members of the House represent smaller districts within individual states, while Senators represent entire states. As a result, the interests and concerns of their constituents may differ, leading to variations in the content of bills addressing the same subject.

2. Committee Assignments: Bills are first introduced and reviewed in committees before being considered by the full chamber. Each chamber has its own set of committees with different areas of expertise. The committees in the House and Senate may have varying priorities and perspectives on specific issues, leading to different approaches in crafting legislation.

3. Amendments and Markups: As bills progress through the legislative process, they can be amended and modified in committees and on the floor of each chamber. Amendments added during committee markups or floor debates can significantly alter the content of the original bill, leading to differences between House and Senate versions.

4. Political and Partisan Factors: Political dynamics can also influence the content of bills. The House and Senate may have different party compositions, and partisan interests can shape the priorities and proposals of each chamber.

5. Time Constraints: The House and Senate often work on different timelines, and the pressure to pass legislation within specific timeframes can influence the scope and content of bills. Differences may arise due to the need to reconcile various legislative schedules.

6. Negotiations and Compromise: To become law, a bill must pass both the House and the Senate in identical form. As a result, differences in bills passed by each chamber can lead to negotiations and compromise during the process of reconciliation to produce a final version that can gain the support of both chambers.

Ultimately, these differences between House and Senate bills reflect the unique roles and structures of each chamber in the legislative process and the diverse perspectives of their members, resulting in distinct approaches to addressing legislative issues.

To know more about Senate:

https://brainly.com/question/30250862

#SPJ2

Answer:

d. About a Buddhist monk's public immolation.

From the History of Ohio's Constitution by iCivics, several changes have been discussed that have impacted how the Ohio government functions and serves the people. Among these changes, I believe that the adoption of the Constitution had the greatest impact.

The 1851 Ohio Constitution was a significant change from the previous 1802 Constitution. It established a more modern government structure, including the separation of powers among three branches of government, which was modeled after the federal government. This new structure provided a system of checks and balances, where each branch could check the power of the others, preventing any one branch from becoming too powerful.

Another major change introduced by the 1851 Ohio Constitution was the expansion of the right to vote. Previously, only white men who owned property could vote, but the new constitution expanded voting rights to all white men, regardless of property ownership. This change paved the way for later expansions of voting rights, including the right to vote for women and people of color.

The 1851 Ohio Constitution included a provision for a constitutional convention to be held every 20 years. This provision allowed for the Ohio Constitution to be updated to reflect changing times and societal values.

Learn more about constitutions here https://brainly.com/question/24638264

#SPJ1

Explanation:

Based on the excerpt, an American abolitionist could claim that paying enslaved people for their labor and treating them as hired servants can lead to a more disciplined and industrious workforce, as evidenced by the army of Toussaint during the Haitian Revolution. Therefore, an abolitionist could argue that abolishing slavery in the United States and treating formerly enslaved people as hired servants would lead to a more productive and efficient workforce. The closest option is C: "People work harder and do a better job when they are paid for their work."