Help me
Thank you :)
Have a great day :)

Answer:

In the explanation:

Explanation:

Ancient farmers in the tropical lowlands of Mesoamerica, such as the Maya, developed a number of techniques to cope with the poor soils and thick forests of the region. One such technique was terrace agriculture, in which farmers built terraces on the sides of hills to create level areas for planting. This allowed them to take advantage of thin soils and increased sunlight while also preventing soil erosion. Another technique was the creation of raised fields or chinampas, which were small plots of land created by piling up soil and then flooding it. This method allowed farmers to grow crops in nutrient-rich soil that was artificially created and took advantage of the water table.

Additionally, ancient Mesoamerican farmers used a complex system of irrigation, canals, dams, and reservoirs to manage water resources and control flooding. They also used slash-and-burn agriculture, clearing small areas of forest, planting crops, and then moving on when the soil was depleted. They also developed a variety of crop rotation methods, intercropping and agroforestry, which allowed them to sustainably use the land over time.

The ancient Mesoamerican farmers were also skilled in identifying and cultivating a wide range of crops suitable for the tropical lowlands, for example, maize, beans, squash, and manioc. They also domesticated a number of animals such as turkeys, dogs, and also developed a system of trade and exchange to get the resources they couldn't produce themselves.

In summary, ancient farmers in the tropical lowlands of Mesoamerica coped with poor soils and thick forests through a combination of techniques including terrace agriculture, raised fields, irrigation systems, slash-and-burn agriculture, crop rotation, agroforestry, and the cultivation of a wide range of crops and domestication of animals.

It is true that the crew of starship enterprise encounters floating head of Zsa Zsa Gabor.

In an organized or hierarchical organization, a crew is a group or a class of people who collaborate on the same project. Where a crew works is known as a crewyard or workyard. The word has nautical implications, alluding to ship operations, particularly those of a sailing ship, which usually involve a chain of command and call for a range of crew members with different skills. Despite the fact that the two teams together make up the ship's company, officers and crew are clearly separated in traditional nautical jargon. Members of a crew are usually referred to as crewmen or crew-members. The rowing sport known as crew also refers to teams competing in racing shells.

To learn more about company, visit:

https://brainly.com/question/714966

#SPJ1

The effect of the passage of the Civil Rights Act was that A. Democrats lost political support in the South

The Dixiecrats, a term for Southern Democrats who opposed the civil rights movement's advancements, persisted in their opposition. Prior to the Republican Party's founding in the previous century, the Democratic Party had a propensity to rule the South. But when Democrats Kennedy and Johnson sided with the civil rights movement, party bonds were tested and shattered.

The same voters gravitated toward Republican candidates like Richard Nixon in subsequent elections. With the exception of Georgia Governor Jimmy Carter in 1976, no Democratic candidate for president has been able to win the majority of southern states since 1960.

Find out more on the civil rights act at https://brainly.com/question/385896

#SPJ1

Options for this question include:

A. Democrats lost political support in the south

B. Democrats lost any chance of winning the presidency

C.Republicans became the dominant party in the northeast

d. Republicans lost political support in the south

Answer: George Washington

Explanation:

Famous astronomer proposed a model of the solar system that involved the Earth revolving around the sun, which is also according to NASA provision.

Copernicus, who was the father of modern astronomy, was a Polish astronomer and mathematician was the first European scientist to propose the heliocentric theory of the solar system, which states that Earth and other planets revolve around the sun.

Prior to the publication of his major astronomical work, "On the Revolutions of the Heavenly Spheres," in 1543, European astronomers argued that Earth was at the center of the universe, as most ancient philosophers did. Therefore, most astronomer proposed a model of the solar system that involved the Earth revolving around the sun, which is also according to NASA provision.

Read more about astronomer

brainly.com/question/28855574

#SPJ1

Imperialism is a system in which a strong nation occupies, governs, and takes advantage of weaker nations. Before World War I, a number of European countries held imperial positions. Early in the 20th century, nationalism was a powerful force in Europe and a major factor in the outbreak of World War I.

Imperial rivalry and the quest for additional lands and possessions fueled friction between the major European powers and contributed to the start of the conflict. Colonies are ruled by the imperial nation, a puppet administration, or local allies. In the colony, there is frequently a military presence to uphold law and order, put down uprisings and opposition, and discourage imperial competitors.

A strong sense of patriotism or loyalty to one's country is known as nationalism. Nationalists elevate their own country's interests above those of other nations by exaggerating its significance or qualities.

Through their statements and language, politicians, diplomats, and royals helped to foster this nationalism. Additionally, press coverage and popular culture were heavily influenced by nationalist sentiment. Nationalist rhetoric and provocative articles, like rumors about rival countries and their sinister intentions, were commonplace in many periodicals. Literature, music, theater, and visual arts all contained nationalist concepts.

To learn more about nationalism, click below:

https://brainly.com/question/1018147

#SPJ4

The Nazi Party's precipitous climb to power began in 1930 when it won 107 seats in the Reichstag, Germany's parliament. Hitler became chancellor in January 1933 and quickly established himself as Germany's ultimate dictator.

The year 1933 was important in terms of Nazi political achievement. Traditionally, the Chancellor was appointed by the leader of the party with the most seats in the Reichstag. President Paul von Hindenburg, on the other hand, was hesitant to appoint Hitler as chancellor.

Following lengthy backroom talks involving businessmen, Hindenburg's son, former chancellor Franz von Papen, and Hitler, Hindenburg acquiesced and formally named Adolf Hitler as Germany's next chancellor on 30 January 1933. Hitler, despite being chancellor, was not yet an absolute dictator.

To learn more about Hitler, Click here:

https://brainly.com/question/12778492

#SPJ4

What was the significant difference between Elizabeth I and Charles I?

Even though Elizabeth was next in line after Charles, she did not have English support because she was a woman.

Elizabeth was a Catholic who was tolerant to Protestants, while Charles was an intolerant Protestant.

Elizabeth did not directly challenge the authority of parliament, while Charles tried to rule defying parliament.

Elizabeth had to establish a new royal line, while Charles was part of a well-established family.What was the significant difference between Elizabeth I and Charles I?

Even though Elizabeth was next in line after Charles, she did not have English support because she was a woman.

Elizabeth was a Catholic who was tolerant to Protestants, while Charles was an intolerant Protestant.

Elizabeth did not directly challenge the authority of parliament, while Charles tried to rule defying parliament.

Elizabeth had to establish a new royal line, while Charles was part of a well-established family.What was the significant difference between Elizabeth I and Charles I?

Even though Elizabeth was next in line after Charles, she did not have English support because she was a woman.

Elizabeth was a Catholic who was tolerant to Protestants, while Charles was an intolerant Protestant.

Elizabeth did not directly challenge the authority of parliament, while Charles tried to rule defying parliament.

Elizabeth had to establish a new royal line, while Charles was part of a well-established family.What was the significant difference between Elizabeth I and Charles I?

Even though Elizabeth was next in line after Charles, she did not have English support because she was a woman.

Elizabeth was a Catholic who was tolerant to Protestants, while Charles was an intolerant Protestant.

Elizabeth did not directly challenge the authority of parliament, while Charles tried to rule defying parliament.

Elizabeth had to establish a new royal line, while Charles was part of a well-established family.What was the significant difference between Elizabeth I and Charles I?

Even though Elizabeth was next in line after Charles, she did not have English support because she was a woman.

Elizabeth was a Catholic who was tolerant to Protestants, while Charles was an intolerant Protestant.

Elizabeth did not directly challenge the authority of parliament, while Charles tried to rule defying parliament.

Elizabeth had to establish a new royal line, while Charles was part of a well-established family.What was the significant difference between Elizabeth I and Charles I?

Even though Elizabeth was next in line after Charles, she did not have English support because she was a woman.

Elizabeth was a Catholic who was tolerant to Protestants, while Charles was an intolerant Protestant.

Elizabeth did not directly challenge the authority of parliament, while Charles tried to rule defying parliament.

Elizabeth had to establish a new royal line, while Charles was part of a well-established family.What was the significant difference between Elizabeth I and Charles I?

Even though Elizabeth was next in line after Charles, she did not have English support because she was a woman.

Elizabeth was a Catholic who was tolerant to Protestants, while Charles was an intolerant Protestant.

Elizabeth did not directly challenge the authority of parliament, while Charles tried to rule defying parliament.

Elizabeth had to establish a new royal line, while Charles was part of a well-established family.What was the significant difference between Elizabeth I and Charles I?

Even though Elizabeth was next in line after Charles, she did not have English support because she was a woman.

Elizabeth was a Catholic who was tolerant to Protestants, while Charles was an intolerant Protestant.

Elizabeth did not directly challenge the authority of parliament, while Charles tried to rule defying parliament.

Elizabeth had to establish a new royal line, while Charles was part of a well-established family.What was the significant difference between Elizabeth I and Charles I?

Capture of Mexico City September 1847 convinced many Mexicans that they could not win the war.

Explain Mexican–American War?

The Mexican–American War was a conflict between the United States and Mexico that lasted from 1846 to 1848. It was a result of the annexation of Texas by the United States in 1845, which led to further disputes. The United States sought to gain land from Mexico and ultimately captured much of present-day California, Arizona, and New Mexico. The war left a legacy of distrust between the two countries and established the Rio Grande as the border between them. The war also established the United States as a major world power, and it was a major boost to the nation’s economy.

The Capture of Mexico City in September 1847 convinced many Mexicans that they could not win the war because it marked the defeat of the Mexican army and the capture of the capital. This event was the last major battle of the war and effectively ended it in favor of the United States.

Therefore, Capture of Mexico City September 1847 is the correct answer.

To learn more about Mexican–American War from the link

https://brainly.com/question/28226005

#SPJ1

Answer: the answer is Battle of

Buena Vista

The dred scott decision convinced more people, especially republicans that there really were no states that could be free state.

The Free State, known as Orange Free State until the 28th of June 1995 when its name was changed, is a province of South Africa. Its capital is Bloemfontein, which is also South Africa's judicial capital. Its historical origins lie in the Boer republic called the Orange Free State and later Orange Free State Province.

The current borders of the province date from 1994 when the Bantustans were abolished and reincorporated into South Africa. It is also the only one of the four original provinces of South Africa not to undergo border changes, apart from the reincorporation of Bantustans, and its borders date from before the outbreak of the Boer War.

Learn more about free states at

https://brainly.com/question/1238899.

#SPJ4

Budgeting is important because it allows you to control your spending, keep track of your expenses, and save more money. Budgeting can also help you make better financial decisions, plan for emergencies, get out of debt, and stay on track with your long-term financial goals.

The first step in regaining control of your personal financial wellness is to understand how much money comes in each month and how much is spent. The ideal situation is, of course, to have more income than expenses.

A personal or household budget is essentially a financial plan that is used to allocate expected income toward paying monthly expenses and debts. Spending history influences how much money is allocated to each budget item. A budget should include a provision for saving.

The foundation of budgeting is always the same: tracking your money, not only to know where it is going but also to plan how to spend or save it better.

Read more about personal budget

brainly.com/question/3743472

#SPJ1

Answer:

E. The President

In a free and fair democratic election that stunned the globe in 1994, South Africans replaced president F. W. de Klerk with Nelson Mandela.

The nonviolent revolution in South Africa began 25 years ago. Even in the 1980s, experts predicted that any shift away from black dominant part authority and white minority mastery would hasten a foolish common war. In a free and fair democratic election that stunned the globe in 1994, South Africans replaced president F. W. de Klerk with Nelson Mandela. The future of South Africa held a huge guarantee in 1991. After a protracted period of the ruthless, legalized racial segregation known as apartheid, Nelson Mandela was released from prison, the African National Congress (ANC) was no longer subject to restrictions, and negotiations for a new constitution had begun. Political animosity between the ANC and its rivals remained an unavoidable fact, although

Learn more about Democratic election here:

https://brainly.com/question/20304452

#SPJ4

The complete question is:

Democrat introduces legislation to make white people criticizing minorities a federal crime: True/False

The quote is from the Reverend Timothy Dwight, who was a prominent figure in the Federalist Party and the President of Yale College in the late 18th century. He is expressing his fear and opposition to the election of Thomas Jefferson, who was the candidate of the Democratic-Republican Party, in the "Revolution of 1800".

The context of the quote relates to the political and cultural divisions between the Federalist Party and the Democratic-Republican Party during the "Revolution of 1800". The Federalists, of which Dwight was a member, were generally more conservative and advocated for a strong central government, while the Democratic-Republicans, led by Jefferson, were more liberal and advocated for states' rights and a smaller, less powerful central government.

Dwight's fear that "the Bible would be cast into a bonfire" and "our holy worship changed into a dance of [French] Jacobin phrensy" reflects the Federalists' belief that the Democratic-Republicans, who were seen as more secular and influenced by the ideals of the French Revolution, would undermine traditional religious values and morals in the United States. This sentiment is also reflected in Alan Taylor's reading "The Internal Enemy: Slavery and War in Virginia, 1772-1832" where he writes "Federalists warned that the election of Jefferson would bring atheism and anarchy" (Taylor, pg. 59).

In addition, Dwight's reference to "Voltaire and the dragoons of Marat" highlights the Federalists' fear that the Democratic-Republicans would import the radical and violent ideas of the French Revolution to the United States. This fear is also reflected in Taylor's reading where he writes "Federalists warned that the election of Jefferson would bring the Reign of Terror to America" (Taylor, pg. 59).

Overall, Dwight's quote reflects the Federalists' fear and opposition to the political and cultural changes that they believed would occur if Thomas Jefferson and the Democratic-Republican Party came to power during the "Revolution of 1800".

Britain was responsible for the  running of the German advance during the interwar period( 1919- 1939).

During this period, Britain had a policy of conciliation towards Germany, which allowed Germany to rearm and take back  homes lost in WWI without any consequences. This lack of action, combined with Britain's  turndown to form alliances with other European countries, encouraged Germany to come more aggressive and eventually led to the  launch of WWII.

Britain's  reckless  running of the German advancement during this time period allowed an aggressive, militaristic nation to gain power and launch a  ruinous war that could have been averted.

To know more about German advance visit:

https://brainly.com/question/29842988

#SPJ4

1) The photographer intends for the audience to notice the setting of the picture.  The photographer wants the observer to be able to go back in time to see what it meant to have an agrarian culture.

2) The choices that were made in taking the picture include ensuring that very good-looking horses were selected, yoked with agricultural equipment and positioned such that the perspective indicates a farmhouse at the background

3) It is not clear who exactly coined the idea for the picture but the person must have grown up in Mary land as this is a picture of a place in Beltsville, Maryland, in 1935.

4) It is very possible that the owner of the farmland paid for the picture.

An agrarian civilization, often known as an agricultural society, is any community whose economy is centered on the production and upkeep of crops and farms.

Another method to characterize an agricultural society is to look at how percent of a country's overall output comes from agriculture.

Learn more about Settings:
https://brainly.com/question/11678414
#SPJ1

Truman's Loyalty Review Board looked into government workers, and those found to be unfaithful were fired. Individuals under investigation were not permitted to view the evidence against them, which is a violation of their constitutional rights.

The fundamental components of Truman's directive created the foundation for an extensive and potent government organization to conduct loyalty checks. In every federal department and agency, loyalty boards were to be established. These boards were tasked with reviewing each employee using lists of "totalitarian, fascist, communist, or subversive" organizations that the attorney general had provided. They also relied on FBI investigations. A worker would be fired if there were "reasonable grounds" to question their commitment. The Civil Service Commission established a Loyalty Review Board to handle employee appeals.

Only a few employees whose loyalty could be "reasonably" questioned were found, thanks to Truman's loyalty program. Although some of the allegations that his administration was "soft" on communists did go away temporarily due to his decision. In 1949–1950, things underwent a significant transformation. The Soviet Union created the atomic bomb, the Communists conquered China, and Senator Joseph McCarthy delivered his infamous speech in which he claimed that the Department of State employed over 200 "known communists." The Red Scare was in full swing as a result of accusations that the Truman administration was "coddling" communists.

To learn more about Truman, click below:

https://brainly.com/question/1235801

#SPJ4

Answer: They had lost their faith in the goodness of humanity as a result of the violence of World War I.

Explanation: Honestly, it has got to be either c. or d., but I think it's d. in my thought.

It is most likely that Las Casas would have been deeply critical of the actions of Columbus and Cortés towards the indigenous peoples of Hispaniola and Tenochtitlan.

Las Casas was a strong advocate for the rights of indigenous peoples and was critical of the violence and exploitation that was inflicted upon them by Spanish colonizers. He believed that the indigenous peoples should be treated with respect and dignity and that forced labor and violence were unacceptable methods of colonization.

Also, he stated that the natives were innocent sheep and that they were devoid of craft and malice. Therefore, it is likely that he would have condemned the actions of Columbus and Cortés as cruel and unjust because they explored and violated the indigenous peoples.

Read more about Las Casas

brainly.com/question/17177002

#SPJ1

This means we should avoid a common fundamental misunderstanding about the teaching of Jesus by realizing that God begins the Beatitudes with a guarantee that the kingdom of heaven belongs solely to those who acknowledge their spiritual poverty, repent, and believe the gospel (Matt. 5:3).

When thinking about the second beatitude, "Blessed are those who weep, for they shall be comforted," it is crucial to keep this in mind (gospel Matt. 5:4). When we read this, we might assume that God is consoling us in our grief over the loss of a loved one. In times of loss, believers undoubtedly feel God's comfort, but this is only one way the second beatitude's promise is realized.

Scripture mentions more causes for mourning among the Lord's people, and He keeps His promise to ease our pain in these circumstances as well.

To know more about God:

brainly.com/question/14172409

#SPJ4

The United States lagged behind Europe in implementing key social welfare programs during the first three decades of the twentieth century due to the dominance of individualism and laissez-faire economic ideology.

During the early twentieth century, European countries, such as Germany and Great Britain, began to implement social welfare programs, including old-age pensions, unemployment insurance, and health care. However, the United States did not follow suit until much later.

One of the main reasons for this was the dominance of individualism and laissez-faire economic ideology in the United States. These beliefs held that the government should not interfere in the economy and that individuals should be responsible for their own welfare. This led to resistance to government intervention in social welfare programs.

For more questions like Twentieth century click the link below:

https://brainly.com/question/8447969

#SPJ4

A small number of those who survived the Nazi camp complex came back to make sure the location wouldn't be erased from history.

The word "holocaust," which means "burnt offering," is derived from ancient Greek. The phrase was occasionally used to describe the deaths of huge groups of individuals before the Second World War, but since 1945, it has almost exclusively been associated with the extermination of European Jews during the conflict. Because of this, we refer to it as "the Holocaust." Jews often use the Hebrew word "Shoah," which means "catastrophe," to describe it.

The Holocaust, often spelled as the Shoah, was World War II's mass murder of Jews in Europe. Six million Jews, or roughly two-thirds of the Jewish population in Europe, were methodically murdered by Nazi Germany and its allies between 1941 and 1945 while living under German occupation.

Learn more about holocaust here:

https://brainly.com/question/12962

#SPJ1

Most medieval Europeans believed that natural disasters such as earthquakes were caused by God's wrath or the devil's influence.

They believed that natural disasters were a sign of divine displeasure or were caused by malevolent forces. Earthquakes were seen as punishments for sins committed by the people and were taken as warnings to repent and return to the right path.

Natural disasters were also sometimes interpreted as signs of the end of the world, or a sign of impending disaster.

People of the time often tried to appease God or the devil through prayer and sacrifice, hoping to avert disaster and bring about peace and prosperity. Some communities even built churches or shrines in locations prone to natural disasters, hoping to protect themselves from the wrath of God or the devil.

Learn more about medieval europeans :

https://brainly.com/question/20850350

#SPJ4

He then sent missionaries to other countries to spread Buddha's message where it was received so well that Buddhism became more popular in countries like Sri Lanka, China, Thailand, and Korea than it was in India - a situation which, actually, is ongoing – and Buddhist thought developed further after that.

Plato believed that tyrants would be problems for the people because he believed that tyrants were individuals who sought power for their own personal gain, rather than for the benefit of the community. In his work, "The Republic," Plato argues that tyrants are driven by their own desires for wealth, power, and pleasure, and that they will use their power to exploit and oppress the people.

According to the germ hypothesis, diseases could develop locally and be influenced by things like poor drainage or abrupt changes in the weather. As a result, answer option (A) is correct.

Many diseases have a currently recognized scientific theory, which is the germ theory of disease. It claims that pathogens, or "germs," are microorganisms that cause disease. They invade people, other animals, and other live hosts because they are too small to be noticed without magnification.

Within their hosts, they can multiply and expand, potentially causing disease. The term "germ" encompasses not only bacteria but also other microorganisms like fungus and protists, as well as dead pathogens like viruses, prions, and viroids that can still spread disease.

Hence, option (A) is accurate.

Learn more about germ theroy, from:

brainly.com/question/17636153

#SPJ1

The Dark Passing was the most important of the many factors that caused the middle age estate system to collapse down a long time ago.

The massive bequest that the ruler gave to a master for the medieval-era home. The villa served as both the master's and his family's residence as well as the estate's central gathering place. Workers were given permission to live on the estate in exchange for working the demesne, or land set aside for the master. The fortified lodge emerged around the fourteenth century. These mid-strengthened mansions had a lumber rooftop and weren't quite palaces, but they were more advanced than the Saxon corridor. The base materials were block or stone. The Dark Passing was the most important of the many factors that caused the middle age estate system to collapse a long time ago.

Learn more about Medieval-era home here:

https://brainly.com/question/29746146

#SPJ4

answer : east asia

Chinese Cultural Influence

It is difficult to overstate the level of influence that Chinese culture had on surrounding countries. Most notably, in Vietnam, the government was not only a protectorate of the Chinese Emperor for much of the last two thousand years, but many aspects of Vietnamese culture, from food and social customs, to government and philosophy, have come almost exclusively from China.

In fact, during the one period of foreign occupation in China, when the Mongols ruled China as the Yuan Dynasty, Chinese cultural norms ended up besting the Mongols, having a role in their inability to govern the vast country as their own and resulting in their downfall. This lesson will take a look at how China's culture permeated two other regions of the Middle Kingdom: Korea and Japan.

Save  Timeline Autoplay  Speed Normal

Video  Quiz  Course

53K views

Korea and Chinese Culture

Of the two countries in question, Korea certainly had the greater exposure to Chinese culture. For starters, the Koreans had been home to Chinese military colonies during the Han Dynasty and maintained strong cultural ties to China throughout the Tang period. One of Korea's original three kingdoms, the Goguryeo, was itself heavily influenced by China. And another, the Silla, openly allied with the Tang against its foes. Korea also adopted new philosophies via China: first, Buddhism and later, Confucianism.

Yet Korea was still strongly independent and rejected Chinese domination, both politically and culturally. Perhaps the most startling example of this is that the Koreans endeavored to create their own writing system at a time when other cultures simply borrowed Chinese characters. Known as Hangul, this syllable-based system was designed to provide another layer of cultural protection by limiting the influence of the Chinese language on Korean.

Politically, it was impractical for Korea, a small country in comparison to China, to adopt too aggressive a stance against its neighbor. So instead, the Koreans opted for a strategy based on the Confucian paradigm of how an elder brother, here China, should treat his younger brother, or Korea. By embracing this Chinese philosophy, the Koreans were able to ensure their independence from China, both culturally and militarily.

Japan and Chinese Culture

The Japanese were quite distant from China, lacking the border that the Koreans had with the Middle Kingdom, but still felt the cultural influence from the Imperial throne. Even with the 120 miles of open water between China and Japan, the distance was still short enough to allow the Japanese to take the best of what they saw in Chinese culture.

In fact, while relatively few Chinese would come to Japan, the Japanese sent envoys to learn everything they could about China, picking the best aspects to adopt in their homeland. Much of this involved philosophical issues, since the Japanese were quite keen to adopt more of the tenets of Buddhism. However, they added many native Japanese elements to the practice. This resulted in a style of belief known as Zen Buddhism, which was quite different from the other varieties of that religion. Further, the Japanese clung to the idea of the Emperor as above the fray of political strife, but this was less from a philosophical love of the Emperor and more from a desire to limit the influence of that office on the political movements of the dominant clan in Japan, the Fujiwara.

The statement differing views on what the nation should be come led to factions and the rise of political parties is true.

An individual or group that works toward a similar political goal but varies in certain ways from the rest of the political body is called a political faction.

Its activities might be more dependable and steady due to the factional system's presence. The organization is able to function without having to appease the whims of several uncompromising people who may otherwise lead to a split by reaching compromises and engaging in give-and-take amongst groups.

Read more on political factions here: https://brainly.com/question/25815264

#SPJ1

Progressive reformers rejected Social Darwinism because they believed that social progress was not necessarily the result of competition and struggle.

Progressive reformers sought to end political corruption, improve the standard of living for the populous, and increase the level of government protection of the people. One of the reform movements throughout the Progressive Era was the suffrage movement. The most notable suffragists were active in many other progressive causes.

Early progressives rejected Social Darwinism and believed that better education, a safe environment, a more productive workplace, and an honest government were the best methods to solve social evils including poverty, poor health, violence, greed, racism, and class strife. Progressives at the period tended to be educated urbanites who believed that the government might be a catalyst for change.

To know more about Progressive Era's

brainly.com/question/2587444

#SPJ4