Due to the pandemic, there was a huge fluctuation in the real estate industry in Dubai. Now back to normal & it is increasing at a rate of 7% p a. What is the price of a villa after 3 years if it is purchased at Dollar 15,000?

Answer with steps please
Need it ASAP!!!

The New York station and the Boston station are 280 miles apart. The trains will pass each other 2 hours after 3:00 pm, which is at 5:00 pm.

Distance is the separation between two points or things. It has magnitude but no direction because it is a scalar quantity. Typically, it is measured in terms of distances like metres, kilometres, feet, and miles.

Let's assume that the trains meet at time t hours after 3:00 pm. In this time, the freight train will travel a distance of 80t miles, and the passenger train will travel a distance of 60t miles. The total distance covered by both trains will be the sum of these distances, which is 80t + 60t = 140t miles.

We know that the total distance between the two stations is 280 miles. Therefore, we can write an equation based on the distance covered by both trains:

80t + 60t = 280

Simplifying this equation, we get:

140t = 280

Dividing both sides by 140, we get:

t = 2

This means that the trains will pass each other 2 hours after 3:00 pm, which is at 5:00 pm.

To know more about distance visit:

https://brainly.com/question/15256256

#SPJ1

Geometric relationships refer to the ways in which different geometric figures or objects are related to each other. These relationships can include measures of angles,lengths of sides or edges, areas, volumes, and other properties.

Some common geometric relationships include:

These are just a few examples of the many geometric relationships that can be studied in mathematics. Understanding these relationships can help us solve problems, make predictions, and create new designs or structures.

Answer: 43.5 inches

Step-by-step explanation:

Divide the 87 by the 2 to get the number of half inches it equates to

Answer: 11.24

Step-by-step explanation:

add them all together and then divide by 2

No, the residual plot indicates that the linear model is just not appropriate since it shows a distinct pattern, which is supported by the linear model's inappropriateness.

A line that, using the bivariate data gathered, summarises the linear relationship (as well as linear trend) between it two variables in either a linear regression study.

An assessment of the line that depicts the actual, but unidentified, linear connection that exists between the two variables is called a regression line. When the value of the determinant is known, the regression line's equation can be employed to predict (or forecast) the value of both the response variable.

equation of the least- squares regression line :

ý = 0.0093-0.00121x

In which,

y = concentration

x = number of hours since the pill taken.

From the graph:

There is a clear pattern formed in this residual line.

Thus, No, the residual plot indicates that the linear model is just not appropriate since it shows a distinct pattern, which is supported by the linear model's inappropriateness.

Know more about the regression line

https://brainly.com/question/17004137

#SPJ1

The only difference between the JK-FF (and JK-latch) and the SR-FF (and SR-latch) is that the JK-FF (and JK-latch) has an additional JK control line. This additional control line allows the device to toggle its state when the control line is pulsed.

The JK-FF and JK-latch function similarly to the SR-FF and SR-latch. The J acts like the S and the K acts like the R.

When the J and K lines are both low, the device acts like the S and R lines are both low for the SR-FF.

However, when the J and K lines are both high, the device will toggle its state, which does not happen with the SR-FF.

The additional JK control line can be used to create different circuits, like a toggle circuit or a pulsed output circuit.

The toggle circuit will change the output from one state to another each time the control line is pulsed, while the pulsed output circuit will produce an output pulse of fixed length.

The JK-FF and JK-latch can also be used to create a counter circuit which counts up or down depending on the J and K lines.

The only difference between the JK-FF (and JK-latch) and the SR-FF (and SR-latch) of the following is that the JK-FF (and JK-latch) has an additional JK control line.

Know more about JK-latch here:

https://brainly.in/question/37192339

#SPJ11

Answer: 10 sticks

Step-by-step explanation:

First one is one stick second is 4 sticks and 3rd is 7 sticks

add 3 extra sticks and you get 10

The 3rd term of the linear sequence is 14

A linear sequence is a sequence of numbers which each successive term increases or decreases by a given value.

Given the linear sequence 22, 18, 14, 10, 6,... We want to find the 3rd term

The general term of a linear sequence is Uₙ = a + (n - 1)d where

In the linear sequence above a = 22. We notice that the second term is U₂ = 18

= a + d

Now d = U₂ - a

= 18 - 22

= -4

Now for the third term, n = 3

So, U₃ = a + (n - 1)d

= a + (3 - 1)d

= a + 2d

Substituting the values of the variables into the equation, we have that

U₃ = a + 2d

= 22 + 2 × (-4)

= 22 - 8

= 14

So, the 3rd term is 14

Learn more about linear sequence here:

https://brainly.com/question/30850640

#SPJ1

on using  disjunctive syllogism to derive Q from the second premise and the derived value of A. if P is true, then Q must also be true..

In logic, a compound statement is made up of two or more simple statements, known as premises or assumptions, that are combined using logical operators such as "and," "or," and "not." To prove a compound statement, we use rules of inference to derive a conclusion based on the given premises.

In the first proof question, we are given three premises: P, P or R, and not S or A. We need to prove the statement Q using these premises. To do so, we use the disjunctive syllogism rule, which states that if one of two disjunctive statements is false, then the other must be true. By assuming ~P, we derive ~S from the third premise using the rule of disjunction. Then, using modus ponens, we derive A from the assumption of ~P and the third premise. Finally, we use disjunctive syllogism to derive Q from the second premise and the derived value of A.

In the second proof question, we are given three premises: not P or S, not S, and R or Q. We need to prove the statement P implies Q using a conditional world proof. We assume P is true and derive S using the first premise. Using the second premise and modus tollens, we derive not R. Finally, using disjunctive syllogism, we derive Q from the third premise and the derived value of not R. Therefore, we show that if P is true, then Q must also be true..

To know more about disjunctive syllogism. click here:

brainly.com/question/22173899

#SPJ4

Answer:

Answer and Explanation below

Step-by-step explanation:

You can get 50 ounces of yogurt with a $15 gift card

Divide 15 by 2.40 ounces should equal 6.25 then multiply by 8 because those are the starting ounces answer is 50

Option D. 12x + 6y = 10, -4x - 6y = -16. To eliminate y from the system of equations, we need to multiply one or both equations by a constant so that the coefficients of y have opposite signs.

Then we can add or subtract the equations to eliminate y.

We can do this by multiplying one or both equations by a constant that will make the coefficients of y add to zero. The goal is to create additive inverses of the coefficients of y in the two equations.

Looking at the two equations:

12x + 6y = 10

2x + 3y = 8

We can see that the coefficients of y are 6 and 3. To eliminate y, we need to find a common multiple of 6 and 3 that will make the coefficients of y additive inverses of each other. The least common multiple of 6 and 3 is 6, so we can multiply the second equation by -2 to get:

-4x - 6y = -16

Now we can add this equation to the first equation to eliminate y:

12x + 6y = 10

(-4x - 6y = -16)

8x = -6

Therefore, the correct pair of equations after multiplying to eliminate y is:

12x + 6y = 10

-4x - 6y = -16

To learn more about system of equations please click on below link.

https://brainly.com/question/27919853

#SPJ1

x = 7/3.

To solve this equation, you need to first simplify the left side of the equation. The left side of the equation can be simplified to -3/(2x). Then, you can set the two expressions equal to each other and solve for x.

-(3)/(2x) = (1)/(6x)

-(6x)/(2x) = (1)/(6x)

-3 = 1

-2 = 1

Therefore, x = 7/3.

Learn more about Equations

brainly.com/question/29657983

#SPJ4

Answer: X-intercept: (38/7, 0)

Y intercept: (0, -38)

Step-by-step explanation:

To find X-intercept(s), substitute in 0 for y and solve for x

(0)−4=7(x−6) Solve the equation

rewrite the equation as: 7 (x-6) = (0) -4

subtract 4 from 0: 7 (x-6) = -4

Divide each term in 7 (x-6) = -4 by 7 and simplify

x-6= -4/7

Move all terms not containing x to the right side of the equation.

x= 38/7

X-intercept(s) in point form.

X-intercept(s): (38/7,0)

Sry cant upload a photo to save my life (for y-intercept(s):)

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

The initial value, a, is 350, and the growth rate, b, is 1.75 so this is an exponential growth function.

The probability the chosen volunteer does not possess yq 77 is 0.655 (nearest to three decimal places).

Given information: One of the volunteers whose sam 77 test result was positive will be chosen at random.

To find: The probability the chosen volunteer does not possess yq 77.

Let P(Y) be the probability that a volunteer possesses yq77 and P(Y') be the probability that a volunteer does not possess yq77. It is given that out of 150 volunteers, 77 tested positive for SAM.

Therefore, the probability of testing positive for SAM is:

P(SAM) = number of volunteers who tested positive for SAM / total number of volunteers= 77/150

Now, using the probability law of total probability, we can find the probability of a volunteer not possessing yq77, as follows:

P(Y') = P(Y'|SAM) P(SAM) + P(Y'|SAM') P(SAM')

It is given that yq77 is found in 60% of volunteers who tested positive for SAM, and in 30% of those who did not test positive for SAM.

Therefore:

P(Y'|SAM) = 0.6, P(Y'|SAM') = 0.3

Now, substituting the given values in the equation,

P(Y') = (0.6 × 77/150) + (0.3 × 73/150)≈ 0.655

for such more question on probability

https://brainly.com/question/24756209

#SPJ11

Can predict the friction coefficient as a function of temperature with high accuracy.

We can interpret the following from the value of RMSE:The value of RMSE is a metric used to measure the accuracy of the predicted and observed data. A lower value of RMSE indicates that the experimental data is in agreement with the theoretical model used, while a higher value of RMSE indicates that the experimental data does not agree with the theoretical model used.The RMSE value of 0.000711079 in the experiment implies that the experimental results are in good agreement with the model, and the model used can predict the friction coefficient as a function of temperature with high accuracy.

Learn more about RMSE

brainly.com/question/28331472

#SPJ4

Dunn's TV is 13 inches lοng and 6 inches wide.

A quadratic equatiοn is a type οf pοlynοmial equatiοn in which the highest degree οf the variable (usually x) is 2. It has the general fοrm:

ax² + bx + c = 0

Let x be the width οf the TV. Since the TV is 7 inches lοnger than it is wide, its length wοuld be x + 7.

The area οf a rectangle is equal tο its length multiplied by its width. Therefοre, we can set up the equatiοn:

area = length x width

Substituting the values we have:

78 = (x + 7) x x

Simplifying:

78 = x² + 7x

Re-arranging and setting the equatiοn tο zerο:

x² + 7x - 78 = 0

This is a quadratic equatiοn that can be sοlved using the quadratic fοrmula:

x = (-b ± √(b² - 4ac)) / 2a

where a = 1, b = 7, and c = -78.

Plugging these values intο the fοrmula, we get:

x = (-7 ± √(7² - 4(1)(-78))) / 2(1)

Simplifying:

x = (-7 ± √(49 + 312)) / 2

x = (-7 ± √(361)) / 2

x = (-7 ± 19) / 2

We take the pοsitive rοοt because x represents a length, which must be a pοsitive value. Therefοre:

x = (12) / 2 = 6

This means that the width οf the TV is 6 inches, and its length is 6 + 7 = 13 inches.

Hence, Dunn's TV is 13 inches lοng and 6 inches wide.

To learn more about quadratic equations, Visit

https://brainly.com/question/1214333

#SPJ1

The count of TV to be sold to give the maximum profit are 24 and 48, respectively

The objective function is given as

P(n, m) = 175b + 205m

The constraints, and their evaluated values are given as

P(0, 0) =175(0) + 205(0) = 0

P(0, 64) =175(0) + 205(64) =13,120

P(24, 48) =175(24) + 205(48) =14,040

P(72, 0) =175(72) + 205(0) = 12,600

From the above computations, we have the maximum value to be

Maximum = 14040

These values are at

b = 24 and m = 48

Hence, the number of TV to be sold are 24 and 48, respectively

Read more about objective functions at

https://brainly.com/question/15830007

#SPJ1

If the fire department brought a 35-foot ladder, Can they save the family: = √(325) feet. And They can't save family because √400  > √325

Given that :- height - 30 feet , ladder - 35 feet

[tex]AC^2 = AB^2+ BC^2[/tex]

BC =  √([tex]AC^2-AB^2[/tex])

     = √([tex]35^2 -30^2[/tex])

     = √( 1225 - 900)

     = √(325) feet

but the fire department must be so face from the bream of the building

  20 = √[tex](20)^2[/tex]

= √400 > √325

They can't save family because √400  > √325

Pythagorean theorem, the notable mathematical theorem that the amount of squares on the legs of a right triangle is equivalent to the square on the hypotenuse (the side inverse the right point) — or, in recognizable logarithmic documentation, a2 + b2 = c2.

to know more about the Pythagorean theorem click here:

https://brainly.com/question/343682

#SPJ4

The supply of average eggs is decreasing at a rate of approximately -550 cartons per week as the price decreases 7 cents per carton per week.

The equation given states that the weekly supply x (in thousands of cartons) of a certain brand of medium-sized eggs is related to the wholesale price p (in dollars/carton) by the following equation: 625p2 − x2 =100. In order to determine the rate at which the supply is changing, we must first calculate the value of p when x = 37,000, which is the number of cartons available at the beginning of the week. To do this, we can solve the equation for p when x = 37,000[tex]p = (100 + x2)1/2/625[/tex]. When x=37,000, p=3.65. Therefore, if the price is falling at the rate of 7¢/carton/week, then the new price p = 3.65 - 0.07 = 3.58. When we plug this new value of p into the supply equation, we get[tex]x^2[/tex] = 4,225. Taking the square root of both sides gives us x = 65. Therefore, the supply is decreasing at a rate of approximately -550 cartons per week as the price decreases 7 cents per carton per week.

Learn more about average here

https://brainly.com/question/24057012

#SPJ4

the answer depends on how Eva has arranged the leaves on the rulers. If she has not counted any leaves with a length of 2 inches, then the answer is 0. If she has counted some leaves with a length of 2 inches, then the answer is 3 or less, depending on how many she has counted.

by the question.

If we assume that all the leaves are different and none of them are cut or torn, then we can count the number of leaves with a length of 2 inches.

Since the rulers are 6 inches long, we can use them to measure the length of the leaves. If a leaf is 2 inches long, then it is one-third the length of a ruler. Therefore, we can place three 2-inch leaves end-to-end on the ruler.

Since Eva has two rulers, she can measure the length of six leaves in total. If we assume that all the leaves are different, then there are two possibilities:

All six leaves are longer than 2 inches. In this case, we cannot count any leaves with a length of 2 inches.

At least one leaf is 2 inches long. In this case, we can count the number of 2-inch leaves by counting how many times we can place three 2-inch leaves end-to-end on the rulers.

For example, if Eva places three 2-inch leaves on one ruler and none on the other, then she has counted 3 leaves with a length of 2 inches. If she places two 2-inch leaves on one ruler and one on the other, then she has also counted 3 leaves with a length of 2 inches.

To Learn more about number.

https://brainly.com/question/17429689

#SPJ1

Ming can carry a maximum of 1676 wood boards in the car. Ming rental car for her bike to carry tools and Wood to school for a science project her toolbox weighs 20 pounds in the car can make carry messing with 5050 pounds each wood board weighs 3 pounds.

Ming rents a cart for her bike to carry tools and wood to school for her science project. Her toolbox weighs 20 pounds and the cart can carry a maximum of 50 pounds. Each wood board weighs 3 pounds. Let w represent the number of wood boards she can carry.

Let x be the number of wood boards Ming can carry.

Then, the weight of the wood boards is 3x pounds.

Adding the weight of the toolbox, the total weight is 20 + 3x pounds.

The car can carry a maximum of 5050 pounds, so we can set up an inequality:

20 + 3x ≤ 5050

Subtracting 20 from both sides:

3x ≤ 5030

Dividing both sides by 3:

x ≤ 1676.67

Since x represents the number of wood boards, it must be a whole number. Therefore, Ming can carry a maximum of 1676 wood boards in the car.

Ming rents a cart for her bike to carry tools and wood to school for her science project. Her toolbox weighs 20 pounds and the cart can carry a maximum of 50 pounds. Each wood board weighs 3 pounds. Let w represent the number of wood boards she can carry.

To know more about Pounds:

https://brainly.com/question/29181271

#SPJ4

The square root of the difference between the square of thirteen and the square of twelve by first calculating the squares of 13 and 12 is 5.

First, we need to find the square root of thirteen and the square of twelve. The square of a number is the number multiplied by itself. So, [tex]$13^2$[/tex] means [tex]$13$[/tex] multiplied by itself and [tex]$12^2$[/tex] means [tex]$12$[/tex] multiplied by itself.

[tex]$13^2[/tex] = 13 \times 13 = 169

[tex]$12^2[/tex] = 12 \times 12 = 144

Next, we need to find the difference between the square of thirteen and the square of twelve by subtracting the smaller number from the larger one.

169 - 144 = 25

Finally, we take the square root of the difference to find the solution. The square root of a number is the value that, when multiplied by itself, gives the original number.

[tex]\sqrt{25} = 5[/tex]

Therefore, the square root of the difference between the square of thirteen and the square of twelve is 5.

To learn more about square root please click on below link        

https://brainly.com/question/1387049

#SPJ4

Answer:

x = 1.5

Step-by-step explanation:

using the property of logarithms

• [tex]log_{b}[/tex] x = n ⇒ x = [tex]b^{n}[/tex]

then

[tex]log_{2}[/tex] (2x + 5) = 3

2x + 5 = [tex]2^{3}[/tex] = 8 ( subtract 5 from both sides )

2x = 3 ( divide both sides by 2 )

x = 1.5

Answer:

Brent paid $306 for the system.

Step-by-step explanation:

To figure out what he paid for his system, you will use multiplication to figure out how much the discount took off.

First, you would multiply the original cost to the discount they gave him, which is 15%.

360 * .15 = 54

The discount would take $54 off his purchase.

Next, you would use subtraction to find out what he paid in total.

360 - 54 = 306

Brent paid $306 in total after the discounts.

Answer:394.5

Step-by-step explanation:

diameter of circle is 26 so,

radius=r=d/2=13

Area of trapezium=(a+b)/2*h=(19+26)/2*5=45*5/2=225/2=112.5

Area of circle=

[tex]\pi R^{2}=169\pi \\if \ we \ assume \ \pi =3,\\169\pi =169*3=507[/tex]

Area of shaded shape=507-112.5=394.5

Step-by-step explanation:

Let x be the number of leather jackets and y be the number of nylon jackets.

The total cost of leather jackets is $100x and the total cost of nylon jackets is $88y.

The problem states that the inventory of men's jackets is at least $4400, so we have:

100x + 88y ≥ 4400

This is the system of inequalities:

100x + 88y ≥ 4400

x ≥ 0 (since we cannot have a negative number of jackets)

y ≥ 0 (since we cannot have a negative number of jackets)

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

[tex]-\frac{4}{5} (30x-40)+(42x+4)=-\frac{4}{5} (10)(3x-4)+2(21x+2)[/tex]

                                         [tex]=-8(3x-4)+2(21x+2)[/tex]

                                         [tex]=-24x+32+42x+4[/tex]

                                         [tex]=-18x+36[/tex]

                                         [tex]=-18(x-2)[/tex]

Answer:

its 240

Step-by-step explanation: 10 x 8 x 3 = 240 :)

Answer:

a) Volume= length x width x height  v=l x w x h

b) 240 cm^3 (cm cubed)

Step-by-step explanation:

Substitute into this formula

v=l x w x h

 10 x 8 x 3 = 240

So 240 cm^3 (cm cubed)

Important note: Remember to include units, as they may not be given to you in the exam