Law, however, is not always the same as morality; there are many moral principles that are not governed by human legal authorities. Hence the question of how one can have a practical set of moral rules in the absence of someone to enforce them emerges.
What is meant by moral principles?In order to ensure that they are doing morally, people live by moral ideals. Honesty, justice, and equality are a few of these. Everyone has a varied set of moral values because they are influenced by their upbringing and by the things that are important to them in life. Nursing is governed by seven main ethical principles: responsibility, fairness, nonmaleficence, autonomy, beneficence, faithfulness, and veracity.In and of themselves, each of the five guiding principles autonomy, justice, beneficence, nonmaleficence, and fidelity is an unshakeable fact. One may have a better understanding of the clashing concerns by looking into the dilemma around these ideas.To learn more about moral principles, refer to:
https://brainly.com/question/3520726
What are Newton's law of gravitation (keep it simple)
Answer:
Newton's law of gravitation states that every object in the universe attracts every other object with a force that is directly proportional to the product of their masses and inversely proportional to the square of the distance between their centers. In simpler terms, the law explains how any two objects in the universe attract each other with a force that depends on their mass and distance between them. The greater the mass of the objects and the closer they are, the stronger the gravitational force between them. This law helps to explain many phenomena in the universe, including the orbits of planets around the sun and the gravitational interactions between the moon and the earth.
Explanation:
what information is accurate when describing the nurse practice acts? (select all that apply.) they focus on the practice of the professional nurse they identify actions that fall outside of the nurse's scope of practice the focus of the acts can vary greatly from state to state when considering the law, they are an example of a statute they need to be consistent with applicable federal statures
Answer:
The following options are accurate when describing the Nurse Practice Acts:
They focus on the practice of the professional nurse.They identify actions that fall outside of the nurse's scope of practice.When considering the law, they are an example of a statute.They need to be consistent with applicable federal statutes.Explanation:
Nurse Practice Acts are state laws that regulate the practice of nursing within a particular state. The Nurse Practice Acts focus on the practice of professional nursing, including identifying the scope of practice and actions that fall outside of that scope. As state laws, the Nurse Practice Acts are an example of a statute, and they need to be consistent with applicable federal statutes. The focus of the Nurse Practice Acts can vary from state to state, but they all serve to ensure that nursing practice is safe and effective for patients. Therefore, options A, B, D, and E are accurate when describing the Nurse Practice Acts.
FILL IN THE BLANK. Kyrin is the information technology director for the police department in Newburgh, Indiana. She is responsible for purchasing and maintaining all technology-related equipment and services for the department including computers, printers, body cameras, in-car video devices, servers, and networking equipment. She often buys from CDW, a technology-related firm, and appreciates the opportunity to work with dedicated account executives who are experienced in assisting _______ accounts like the police department.
Answer: Government/public sector
Explanation:
Government/public sector. Kyrin appreciates the opportunity to work with dedicated account executives who are experienced in assisting government/public sector accounts like the police department.
Thanks! :) #BO
She often buys from CDW, a technology-related firm, and appreciates the opportunity to work with dedicated account executives who are experienced in assisting government accounts like the police department.
Kyrin works for a government department and therefore she is bound to help government and as she is also the information technology director for the police department in Newburgh, Indiana. She is responsible for purchasing and maintaining all technology-related equipment and services for the department including computers, printers, body cameras, in-car video devices, servers, and networking equipment.
Know more about government here:
https://brainly.com/question/16940043
#SPJ11
Dealt a-9 tetrahydrocannabinol is blank psychoactive constituent
The main euphoric component of marijuana, delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC), makes Acanthamoeba's brain infection worse.
Is the main psychoactive component delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol?Tetrahydrocannabinol, also known as THC, is the primary psychoactive cannabinoid found in marijuana. THC induces relaxation, mild euphoria, tiredness, and perceptual distortion. There are more than 80 additional cannabinoids, including tetrahydrocannabivarin, cannabidiol, and cannabinol, that are also present in marijuana in addition to THC.
What uses does delta-nine tetrahydrocannabinol have?The treatment of cancer-related nausea and appetite stimulation are the applications of THC that hold the most promise. Both pure forms of delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) and raw marijuana are being researched for medical use.
Learn more about delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC): https://brainly.com/question/8317704
#SPJ9
Ebony Robinson plans to file a civil lawsuit against Luchiea Grissom based on the fact that Luchiea negligently applied a harmful chemical to Ebony's hair, which caused her hair to fall out. Under these facts: (A) Ebony should start her lawsuit by filing a complaint with the court. (B) Ebony should start her lawsuit by filing a motion for directed verdict with the court. (C) Ebony should start her lawsuit by filing an answer with the court. (D) Ebony should start her lawsuit by filing a counter-claim with the court
Due to Luchiea Grissom's carelessness in using a dangerous chemical on Ebony Robinson's tresses, Ebony Robinson intends to sue her in civil court.Ebony should start her lawsuit by filing a complaint with the court. option A is correct.
A complaint is a legal document that sets out the facts of the case, the legal claims being made, and the relief being sought. In this case, the complaint would allege that Luchiea negligently applied a harmful chemical to Ebony's hair, causing it to fall out, and would ask the court for damages to compensate for the harm suffered. Filing a complaint is the first step in starting a civil lawsuit. It initiates the legal process and notifies the defendant (Luchiea) of the lawsuit and the legal claims being made against her. Once the complaint is filed, the defendant will have an opportunity to respond, and the case will proceed through the legal system.
For such more question on lawsuit
https://brainly.com/question/24910850
#SPJ4
the only product claims under current law that are considered deceptive are those that violate public policy. are factually false. are both exaggerated as well as subjective. do not provide complete information. cannot be substantiated.
Answer:
The correct option is: are factually false.
Product claims that are factually false are considered deceptive and are prohibited under current law. This is because false claims can mislead consumers into making purchasing decisions that could harm them or waste their money. Other types of claims, such as subjective claims or claims that cannot be substantiated, may be allowed as long as they do not violate public policy or deceive consumers in a way that is harmful or fraudulent.
Explanation:
So if there was a crime with someone killed someone and the investigators found your blood in the crime scene but you where not there it was just a fellow blood sucking mosquito that the killer killed and the investigators found your blood what about happen?
I made this up btw pls answer
Answer: This is a rare case.
Explanation:
In this case this most likely never happens but when it does you will still be investigated and you would still be a suspect until proven not guilty.
An employee left her job to move across the country and start her own business. After her departure, the employee and her former employer entered into a contract for the employee to provide consulting services to the employer for a one-year period. One month later, the employer told the employee that it intended to withhold payment under the contract because it was not satisfied with the services provided. The employee filed a complaint in federal court, alleging that the employer had breached the consulting contract, for which the employee sought $60,000 in damages. The complaint further alleged that the employee had been the victim of gender discrimination during the course of her employment, in violation of federal law. One week after being served with the complaint, the employer filed an answer.
May the court properly adjudicate the employee's state law claims?
Answers:
A. No, because a plaintiff may not join federal and state law claims in the same action.
B. No, because a court must have subject-matter jurisdiction over all joined claims.
C. Yes, because a state claim may be joined if the requirements for diversity jurisdiction are satisfied.
D. Yes, because a plaintiff may join as many claims as she has against the opposing party.
Answer: A
Explanation:
A. No, because a plaintiff may not join federal and state law claims in the same action.
Federal courts are courts of limited jurisdiction, meaning they can only hear cases arising under federal law or cases where the parties are citizens of different states and the amount in controversy is greater than $75,000. As such, a court cannot adjudicate state law claims and federal law claims in the same action. The employee must file separate complaints for each claim.
Thanks! :) #BO
B. No, because a court must have subject-matter jurisdiction over all joined claims is the correct option.
In this case, the employee has filed a complaint in federal court alleging that the employer had breached the consulting contract, for which the employee sought $60,000 in damages, and that the employee had been the victim of gender discrimination during the course of her employment, in violation of federal law.
The employee's state law claims may be properly adjudicated by the court if the requirements for diversity jurisdiction are satisfied. Diversity jurisdiction requires that the parties be citizens of different states and that the amount in controversy exceed $75,000. In this case, the employee is seeking $60,000 in damages for the breach of contract claim and an unspecified amount for the gender discrimination claim.
If the total amount in controversy exceeds $75,000, the court may properly adjudicate the employee's state law claims. B. No, because a court must have subject-matter jurisdiction over all joined claims is the correct option.
For more about employment:
https://brainly.com/question/1361941
#SPJ11
What is the probable cause for the Issuance of a warrant of arrest
Answer:
please make me brainalist and keep smiling dude I hope you will be satisfied with my answer
Explanation:
Courts usually find probable cause when there is a reasonable basis for believing that a crime may have been committed (for an arrest) or when evidence of the crime is present in the place to be searched (for a search). Under exigent circumstances, probable cause can also justify a warrantless search or seizure.
what do you think a prosecutor would have to show to that ari is guilty of arson (and as a result felony murder)?
A prosecutor would have to show that Ari committed the act of arson and that the act resulted in a death to prove that Ari is guilty of felony murder.
The prosecutor would have to provide evidence that Ari set a fire intentionally, with the purpose of damaging or destroying property. This could include witness testimony, video or photo evidence, or evidence of an accelerant.
The prosecutor would also need to show that the fire resulted in the death of another person, such as through medical evidence, witness testimony, or video or photo evidence.
In addition, the prosecutor would need to show that Ari was aware that setting the fire could result in the death of another person.
Know more about Evidence here
https://brainly.com/question/15880833#
#SPJ11
What are the constitutional rights of the accused?
Answer:
The Sixth Amendment ensures the rights of criminal defendants, including the right to an unbiased jury, the right to a public trial without undue delay, the right to counsel, and the right to know the identity of your accusers as well as the specifics of the allegations and supporting documentation.
Explanation:
Brainliest pls!
Current issues with the 4th amendment
Answer:
Surveillance: With the rise of technology, there is an increasing concern about government surveillance and the potential violation of Fourth Amendment rights. This includes issues such as the use of facial recognition technology, warrantless searches of electronic devices, and the collection of data from social media platforms.
Border Searches: Customs and Border Protection (CBP) officers have broad authority to conduct searches at the border, including searches of electronic devices without a warrant. This has raised concerns about the potential violation of Fourth Amendment rights, particularly for citizens and legal residents who are returning to the country.
No-Knock Warrants: No-knock warrants allow law enforcement officers to enter a person's home without first announcing their presence. This can lead to dangerous and violent encounters and has been the subject of controversy and legal challenges.
Qualified Immunity: Qualified immunity is a legal doctrine that protects government officials from being held personally liable for constitutional violations, including violations of the Fourth Amendment. Critics argue that this doctrine has led to a lack of accountability for law enforcement officers who engage in misconduct or violate citizens' rights.
Explanation:
If the state process mirror the federal process then it's foolproof cons aND pros
please help if you know
Answer: Article VI, Paragraph 2 of the U.S. Constitution is commonly referred to as the Supremacy Clause. It establishes that the federal constitution, and federal law generally, take precedence over state laws, and even state constitutions.
Explanation:
Tammy has been found guilty of causing bodily injury to a neighbor during a fight following a heated discussion regarding their property lines. What consequence will this have on her respiratory care license
Explanation:
I cannot provide a definitive answer on what the specific consequences would be for Tammy's respiratory care license as it varies depending on the state/country and the specific circumstances of the case. However, it is important to note that healthcare professionals are held to a high standard of conduct and ethics, and any criminal conviction or violation of the law can have serious consequences on their professional license and employment status. It is best for Tammy to consult with a legal professional and her state's regulatory board for respiratory care to understand the potential consequences of her conviction on her license.
the average age of senators in the congress was years. if the standard deviation was years, find the -scores corresponding to the oldest and youngest senators of age and . round scores to two decimal places.
In HTML format, the z-scores can be written as subscripts, like this: z_1 = 2.17 and z_2 = -5.17.
To find the z-scores that correspond to the oldest and youngest senators of age 29 and 73 years, respectively, given that the average age of senators in the congress was 60 years and the standard deviation was 6 years, we can use the z-score formula:
z = (x - μ) / σ
where z is the z-score, x is the observed value, μ is the mean, and σ is the standard deviation.
For the oldest senator of age 73 years, we have:
z = (x - μ) / σ
z = (73 - 60) / 6
z = 2.17
For the youngest senator of age 29 years, we have:
z = (x - μ) / σ
z = (29 - 60) / 6
z = -5.17
Therefore, the z-scores that correspond to the oldest and youngest senators of age 73 and 29 years, respectively, are 2.17 and -5.17, rounded to two decimal places.
Note: In HTML format, the z-scores can be written as subscripts, like this: z_1 = 2.17 and z_2 = -5.17.
To know more about z-scores refer here:
https://brainly.com/question/15016913
#SPJ11
4th amendment conflict
Answer:
However, there have been conflicts in recent years regarding the interpretation and application of the Fourth Amendment in various contexts, including law enforcement surveillance, airport security, and digital privacy. Some argue that government surveillance programs, such as the National Security Agency's bulk collection of telephone metadata, violate the Fourth Amendment's protection against unreasonable searches and seizures. Others argue that security measures, such as full-body scans and pat-downs at airports, constitute unreasonable searches.
In addition, there have been debates about the application of the Fourth Amendment to digital privacy, such as the government's ability to access personal information stored on electronic devices and online accounts. The Supreme Court has issued several rulings that attempt to clarify the Fourth Amendment's application in these contexts, but the issues remain controversial and ongoing.
Explanation:
TRUE/FALSE. Tahvildaran Jesswein argues in Chapter 1 that the goal is not to escape difference, but to engage it and represent it in a way that might enrich our public debate and better our understanding of our shared uncertainties and vulnerabilities, and to do a cooperative politics, if only from time to time.
Answer: True
Explanation:
Tahvildaran Jesswein argues in Chapter 1 that the goal is not to escape difference, but to engage it and represent it in a way that might enrich our public debate and better our understanding of our shared uncertainties and vulnerabilities, and to do a cooperative politics, if only from time to time.
Tahvildaran Jesswein does argue in Chapter 1 that the goal is not to escape difference, but to engage it and represent it in a way that might enrich our public debate and better our understanding of our shared uncertainties and vulnerabilities, and to do a cooperative politics, if only from time to time. This statement is true because according to Tahvildaran Jesswein, it is important to recognize and engage with the differences that exist among people, rather than trying to escape or ignore them.
By doing so, we can better understand and appreciate the diversity of perspectives and experiences that exist within our communities and use that understanding to inform and enrich our public debate.
Additionally, Tahvildaran Jesswein argues that engaging with difference can help us to find common ground and work together cooperatively, even if it is only on a temporary basis.
For more similar questions on public debate
brainly.com/question/29547170
#SPJ11
restrictions that limit sugar imports, subsidies for the construction of sports stadiums, and federal spending on programs like the construction of an indoor rain forest in iowa all provide examples of government programs
Yes, these all provide examples of government programs.
Restrictions that limit sugar imports are a type of import tariff, subsidies for the construction of sports stadiums are an example of economic development policy, and federal spending on programs like the construction of an indoor rain forest in Iowa is an example of a public works program.
Restrictions that limit sugar imports, subsidies for the construction of sports stadiums, and federal spending on programs like the construction of an indoor rain forest in Iowa are all examples of government intervention in the economy. These programs are designed to support specific industries or sectors of the economy, and are often used to promote economic growth and development.
Restrictions on sugar imports are designed to protect domestic sugar producers from foreign competition, while subsidies for sports stadiums are intended to promote economic development in the local area. Federal spending on programs like the construction of an indoor rain forest in Iowa is intended to support tourism and other industries in the area.
Overall, these programs are all examples of government intervention in the economy, and are designed to support specific industries or sectors in order to promote economic growth and development.
For more such questions on Government intervention in the economy.
https://brainly.com/question/30166356#
#SPJ11
Ways in which the rule of laws protects community members whose property was damaged due to protests
Answer: Four ways you might want to look into
Explanation:
Criminal prosecution: The rule of law requires that those who commit criminal acts, such as damaging private property, be held accountable for their actions. Community members could report the damage to the authorities, who could then investigate the incident and pursue criminal charges against those responsible.
Civil litigation: The rule of law also provides for civil remedies, such as suing the individuals or groups responsible for the damage. Community members could file a lawsuit seeking compensation for the damage caused to their property.
Police protection: The rule of law requires that law enforcement agencies protect citizens and their property. Community members could request police protection to prevent further damage to their property during future protests.
Injunctions: The rule of law provides for injunctions to prevent individuals or groups from engaging in certain activities, such as damaging private property. Community members could seek an injunction to prevent future damage to their property during protests
true/false. Only one-third of the Senate is up for reelection during any single election year because the framers believed that
this was a way to make the Senate resistant to popular pressure
Answer: True
Explanation:
Only one-third of the Senate is up for re-election during any single election year. This statement is true because the framers believed that this was a way to make the Senate resistant to popular pressure.
The framers of the Constitution wanted the Senate to be a more stable and deliberate body than the House of Representatives, which is why they designed it to have longer terms and staggered elections.
By having only one-third of the Senate up for reelection at a time, it ensures that there will always be a majority of experienced senators who can provide continuity and resist sudden shifts in public opinion. This design helps to prevent the Senate from being too reactive to popular pressure and allows it to focus on the long-term interests of the country.
For more similar questions on election
brainly.com/question/3710013
#SPJ11
us gaas use two categories of professional requirements a identified as conditional and presumptively mandatory b identified as mandatory and presumptively mandatory c which, if relevant, require compliance without departure d to describe the degree of responsibility it imposes on auditors
The two categories of professional requirements used by US GAAS are identified as "unconditional" and "presumptively mandatory." Unconditional requirements are those that require compliance without departure, while presumptively mandatory requirements allow for some flexibility, as long as the auditor can justify any departure from the requirement. Option A.
It is important for auditors to understand and adhere to these professional requirements in order to conduct an audit that is in accordance with US GAAS. Unconditional requirements must be followed without exception, while presumptively mandatory requirements allow for some flexibility, as long as the auditor can justify any departure from the requirement.
By following these requirements, auditors can ensure that they are conducting an audit that is in accordance with US GAAS and providing an accurate and reliable assessment of the entity's financial statements.
To learn more about presumptively mandatory here:
https://brainly.com/question/30733630#
#SPJ11
Explain how each of the following skills might resolve conflict and contribute to harmonious relationships during your grade 12 academic year. . Collaborating. Accommodating. Compromising
During your grade 12 academic year, working together to settle disputes and promote harmonious relationships is the best course of action.
Why do people collaborate?to collaborate with someone else or work together for a specific goal. Many instances are: The most typical technique of collaborating is probably internally. Team cooperation happens when members of the same team cooperate and use a variety of procedures and tools to accomplish shared organizational and team objectives.
for example Group brainstorming When you approach a decision, getting together as a team to exchange thoughts and queries is a fantastic opportunity for collaboration. You can benefit from many different areas of expertise by gathering ideas from many sources.
Why does accommodation occur?Accommodation is a form of social adaptation that entails the creation or acquisition of tools through which one ethnic group creates economic and non-economic ways of life that complement or add to those of the other. The adjustment resulting from the conflict between people and groups is its main focus.
What makes people compromise?By lowering demands or moderating ideas, two parties can reach a compromise and come to an agreement. Compromise or reaching an understanding is a very effective strategy to resolve dispute.
To know more about the compromise visit:
https://brainly.com/question/4526851
#SPJ1
Which of the following contracts must be written?
A. An agreement to purchase a necklace
B. An agreement to walk someone's dog
C. An agreement to buy a house
D. An agreement between friends
Answer: C - An agreement to buy a house
Explanation:
Choose ten (10) law enforcement agencies or occupations where you would like to work in the future, in accordance with the practice of the criminology profession as stated in RA 11131. Explain each law enforcement agency in 50 words you have chosen why you will be joining.
The 10 law enforcement agencies or occupations that fall under the practice of criminology as stated in RA 11131 and a brief description of each:
Philippine National Police (PNP)National Bureau of Investigation (NBI)Bureau of Jail Management and Penology (BJMP)Bureau of Fire Protection (BFP)Philippine Drug Enforcement Agency (PDEA)Philippine Coast Guard (PCG)Bureau of Immigration (BI)National Prosecution Service (NPS)Public Attorney's Office (PAO)Forensic Science ServicesWhat is the description for these law enforcement agencies?The descriptions are as follows:
Philippine National Police (PNP) - the country's primary law enforcement agency that maintains peace and order and prevents and suppresses crime.
National Bureau of Investigation (NBI) - the country's premier investigative agency that conducts high-level and complex criminal investigations and provides intelligence support to law enforcement agencies.
Bureau of Jail Management and Penology (BJMP) - responsible for the safekeeping, reformation, and rehabilitation of persons deprived of liberty.
Bureau of Fire Protection (BFP) - responsible for preventing and suppressing fires and responding to other emergency situations.
Philippine Drug Enforcement Agency (PDEA) - responsible for implementing the government's anti-drug campaign and enforcing drug laws.
Philippine Coast Guard (PCG) - responsible for ensuring the safety and security of the country's maritime jurisdiction and protecting its marine environment.
Bureau of Immigration (BI) - responsible for implementing the country's immigration laws and policies and managing the entry and exit of foreign nationals.
National Prosecution Service (NPS) - responsible for the prosecution of criminal cases and the protection of the rights of victims and witnesses.
Public Attorney's Office (PAO) - provides free legal assistance to indigent clients and serves as the legal defender of the poor.
Forensic Science Services - provide scientific and technical services to support the investigation of crimes and the administration of justice, including crime scene investigation, DNA analysis, and forensic pathology.
One would prefer to join any of these law enforcement agencies because one would love to make the world a better place as a law abiding citizen that one is.
learn more about law enforcement agencies: https://brainly.com/question/27722655
#SPJ1
What is the difference between fundamental rights and principle of policy in pakistan
Answer:
I don't know if this is fully right as I study American Law but here is my answer.
Explanation:
Fundamental Rights are justiciable, as they can be enforced, whereas the directive principles are non-justiciable, in that, they are not enforceable in the court of law. While fundamental rights establish political democracy, directive principles set social and economic democracy.
law enforcement policies often state that certain types of crimes must be reported to the appropriate investigative unit supervisor for determination whether a detective will be sent to the scene. which of the following is an example of a crime that requires notification of the supervisor of the appropriate investigative unit?
The correct answer is B. Homicide. Law enforcement policies often state that certain types of crimes must be reported to the appropriate investigative unit supervisor for determination whether a detective will be sent to the scene. These types of crimes are usually serious and require specialized investigation.
One example of a crime that requires notification of the supervisor of the appropriate investigative unit is homicide. Homicide is the act of one human killing another and is considered a serious crime that requires specialized investigation.
Other examples of crimes that may require notification of the supervisor of the appropriate investigative unit include sexual assault, kidnapping, and arson. These crimes are also considered serious and require specialized investigation. Therefore, the correct answer is B. Homicide.
For more about law enforcement policies:
https://brainly.com/question/462905
#SPJ11
the degree of causation of a tort great enough to be recognized by law is called (a) proximate cause (b) intimate cause (c) inci- dental cause (d) none of the above
The degree of causation of a tort great enough to be recognized by law is called Proximate Cause.
Proximate cause is a legal concept used to identify the scope of liability in tort law. It establishes the limit of responsibility by determining whether the injury was foreseeable and if the defendant was the direct cause of the injury or not.
Proximate cause focuses on the connection between the harm and the wrongful act, and it is an essential element of negligence liability.
In essence, proximate cause is when the law recognizes that the defendant’s actions, or inactions, resulted in a foreseeable harm to the plaintiff. It must be shown that the wrongful act was the direct cause of the injury, and it was foreseeable that harm could have resulted from the defendant’s act or omission.
Proximate cause also considers intervening forces, such as superseding causes, that break the chain of causation between the wrongful act and the resulting injury.
To know more about Proximate cause click on below link:
https://brainly.com/question/12644777#
#SPJ11
Except for parole and probation officers, what are the minimum qualifications for careers in corrections?
a college degree and two years' experience working
a certificate in mental health
O only a high school diploma
O a high school diploma or GED, a driver's license, good health
Answer:
Here are the requirements.
Explanation:
- Be at least 18 years of age (some states/jurisdictions have a minimum age of 21)
- Possess a high school diploma or GED.
- Have no previous felony convictions.
- Be a United States citizen.
- Possess a valid driver's license.
fill in the blank. a good rule of thumb to use in predicting conformity in an ambiguous situation is that there will be a greater dependence on___when physical reality is lacking as a basis for judgment
A good rule of thumb to use in predicting conformity in an ambiguous situation is that there will be a greater dependence on social cues when physical reality is lacking as a basis for judgment.
When individuals are unsure of how to behave or make a decision in an ambiguous situation, they often look to others for guidance. This is known as social influence or conformity.
In situations where there is a lack of physical reality, such as in online interactions or situations where there are no clear rules or norms, individuals are more likely to rely on social cues from others to guide their behaviour.
These social cues can include the actions and opinions of others, as well as nonverbal cues such as body language and tone of voice.
By paying attention to these social cues, individuals can make more informed judgments and decisions in ambiguous situations.
For more similar questions on conformity
brainly.com/question/27088302
#SPJ11
Which of the following theorists believe that there is no distinction between the sovereignty and the people?
Answer: John Locke
Explanation: He uses a theory of natural rights to argue that governments have obligations to their citizens, have only limited powers over their citizens, and can ultimately be overthrown by citizens under certain circumstances.