Anyone know how to do this? I’m stuck

Answer:when he was doing the multipleis of 8 he put 20 when there is no 20

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

28 in grams=793.787 and 28 in kilo =0.793787

Step-by-step explanation:

Step-by-step explanation:

−2x+5y=−15 and 5x+2y=−6

Rewrite equations:

−2x+5y=−15;5x+2y=−6

Step: Solve−2x+5y=−15for x:

−2x+5y=−15

−2x+5y+−5y=−15+−5y(Add -5y to both sides)

−2x=−5y−15

−2x−2=−5y−15−2(Divide both sides by -2)

x=52y+152

Step: Substitute52y+152forxin5x+2y=−6:

5x+2y=−6

5(52y+152)+2y=−6

292y+752=−6(Simplify both sides of the equation)

292y+752+−752=−6+−752(Add (-75)/2 to both sides)

292y=−872

292y292=−872292(Divide both sides by 29/2)

y=−3

Step: Substitute−3foryinx=52y+152:

x=52y+152

x=52(−3)+152

x=0(Simplify both sides of the equation)

Answer:

x=0 and y=−3

Answer:

Decision rule  is  

Fail to reject the null hypothesis

 The conclusion is  

There is sufficient evidence that indicate that there is a significant difference between the two treatments

Step-by-step explanation:

From the question we are told that  

    The sample size is  n =  12

    The first  mean is  [tex]M_1  =  55[/tex]

    The variance is  [tex]s^2_1 =  8[/tex]

    The second mean is  [tex]M_2  =  52[/tex]

     The second variance is [tex]s^2_2 =  4[/tex]

Let the level of significance be  [tex]\alpha  =  0.05[/tex]

The null hypothesis is  [tex]H_o  :  M_1 = M_2[/tex]

The alternative hypothesis is [tex]H_a  :  M_1 \ne M_2[/tex]

  Generally the test statistics is mathematically

     [tex]t = \frac{M_1 - M_2 }{ \sqrt{\frac{s_1^2}{n_1} +\frac{s_2^2}{n_2}} }[/tex]

=>   [tex]t = \frac{55 - 52 }{ \sqrt{\frac{8}{12} +\frac{4}{12 }} }[/tex]

=>   [tex]t = 1.1619 [/tex]

Generally the degree of freedom is mathematically represented as

      [tex]df = 12 -1[/tex]

=>    [tex]df = 11 [/tex]

Generally  from the t- distriibution table the critical  value  of  [tex]\alpha[/tex] at a degree of freedom of [tex]df = 11 [/tex]  is

    [tex]t_{0.05 , 11} =  2.20098516[/tex]

Here given that the critical value is greater than the t statistics value the

Decision rule  is  

Fail to reject the null hypothesis

 The conclusion is  

There is sufficient evidence that indicate that there is a significant difference between the two treatments

Answer:

the fraction and its decimal equivalent for the mark on the ruler

= 59/64 = 0.921875

Step-by-step explanation:

Given that;

A CARPENTER 's ruler is marked in thirty  seconds

mark on the ruler between 29/32 and 30/32​ is the average of the values

we know that average is the summation of all terms divided by the number of appearance of terms

so

= (29/32 + 30/32​) / 2

= ((29 + 30) / 32) / 2

= (59 / 32) / 2

= 59 / 64

= 0.921875

therefore the fraction and its decimal equivalent for the mark on the ruler = 59/64 = 0.921875

ion even know yet

gyfujkl;kjbhvgfcdxsrtuiokl;, nbvghjkjhbgyu

Answer:

b = 13

Step-by-step explanation:

Divide 143 by 11

Answer:

10% of the answer should be 6

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer: −2x+y=−11

(4,-3) = −2x+y=−11.

Answer: −2x+y=−11.

Answer:=================================================

Step-by-step explanation:

the first one

Answer:

========================================================================================================================================

Step-by-step explanation:

it's the equal sign

Answer:

3⁷

Step-by-step explanation:

When you multiplying or dividing numbers with exponents, you keep the base the same and specifically with dividing, you subtract the exponents themselves. So, you would be doing 3-(-4), which is 7.

[tex]\mathfrak{\huge{\pink{\underline{\underline{AnSwEr:-}}}}}[/tex]

Actually Welcome to the Concept of the Exponents and power,

Since we know the concept that, any power in denominator of a fraction is shows as negative power when it comes to the Numerator of the fraction,like eg:-

[tex]1 \div ( {5}^{8} ) = {5}^{ - 8} [/tex]

so we apply here same,

also

[tex]1 \div ({5}^{ - 8} ) = {5}^{8} [/tex]

so we get as,

[tex] {3}^{3} \div {3}^{ - 4} = {3}^{3} \times {3}^{4} [/tex]

this is the answer.

Given that,

A supply of foods last for a week for 20 families.

It is required to find the time that  would the supply last for 3 more families.

20 families = 1 week = 7 days

If 3 more families joined, total no of families are now 23.

It means that,

1 family= (20/7) days

Now,

23 family =

[tex]\dfrac{20}{7}\times 23=65.71\ \text{days}\\\\\approx 66\ \text{days}[/tex]

So, the supply will last for 66 days.

Answer:

1

General Formulas and Concepts:

Order of Operations: BPEMDAS

Step-by-step explanation:

Step 1: Define

a - b + c

a = 4

b = 2

c = -1

Step 2: Solve

Answer:

Angle: 22.5 deg, Complement: 67.5 deg, Supplement: 157.5 deg

Step-by-step explanation:

22.5 is 1/3 of 67.5

so compliment is 67.5.

Supplement is just adding another angle so I chose 7.

I did 22.5 x 7 = 157.5

Another example would be:

Angle: 10 deg, Complement: 30 (because 10 x 3), Supplement: 70 (because 10 x 7)

Hope this helps :)

Answer:

x=-7

Step-by-step explanation:

4(1-x)+2x=-3(x+1)

4-4x+2x=-3x-3

4-2x=-3x-3

-2x=-3x-7

x=-7

Answer:

j=h-4/k    this is the answer if you are solving for j

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

which one equals 12? option C

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer: The answer is 388$

Step-by-step explanation:

First we need to know our domain and range. our domain is POUNDS and range is TOTAL COST of the delivery AND briskit. Next, we need to find how much the briskit cost by itself. The brisket is 38 pounds.  So to do this, we use need to subtract; y - x = briskit cost. It would look like this if you plug in the units:

304 - 38=266

Now we are going to find how much EACH POUND COSTS. To do this, all we have to do is divide the briskit cost and how much the briskit weighs:

266/38=7

Now that we know how much the briskit cost and how much each briskit weighs, we are going to use the formula y=mx+b so that we can plug in 50 pounds for our x. It would look like this if you plug in the units:

y= 7x+ 38

y= 7(50) + 38= 388$

*Don't forget the dollar sign :) *

Answer:

c = 4

Step-by-step explanation:

Solve for"c" in the following equation:

- 8 c + 7 = - 25

Subtract 7 from both sides:

- 8 c = - 25 - 7

combine like terms

- 8 c = -32

divide both sides by "-8" to isolate c on the left

c = - 32 / (-8)

c = 4

Answer: Whats the question? I dont see

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

The 90% confidence interval is   [tex]15.66< \mu < 15.94 [/tex]

Step-by-step explanation:

From the question we are told that

  The population standard deviation is  [tex]\sigma = 2.2[/tex]

  The  sample mean is  [tex]\= x = 15.8 \ gallon[/tex]

   The sample size is  n  =  669

From the question we are told the confidence level is  95% , hence the level of significance is    

      [tex]\alpha = (100 - 90 ) \%[/tex]

=>   [tex]\alpha = 0.10[/tex]

Generally from the normal distribution table the critical value  of  [tex]\frac{\alpha }{2}[/tex] is  

   [tex]Z_{\frac{\alpha }{2} } =  1.645[/tex]

Generally the margin of error is mathematically represented as  

      [tex]E = Z_{\frac{\alpha }{2} } *  \frac{\sigma }{\sqrt{n} }[/tex]

=>  [tex]E = 1.645  *  \frac{ 2.2}{\sqrt{669} }[/tex]

=>  [tex]E = 0.1399[/tex]

Generally 90% confidence interval is mathematically represented as  

      [tex]\= x -E <  \mu <  \=x  +E[/tex]

=>    [tex]15.8  - 0.1399 <\mu<  15.8  + 0.1399 [/tex]

=>    [tex]15.66< \mu < 15.94 [/tex]

Answer:

250 < x < 370

Step-by-step explanation:

From the given bicycle prices, we first calculate the mean.

Mean = ⅛($350 + $450 + $180 + $200 + $290 + $325 + $240 + $445)

Mean = ⅛(2480)

Mean = $310

Next, is to determine the amount willing to pay using.

Amount = Mean ± Absolute Deviation

Amount = $310 ± $60

This can split as follows

Amount = $310 + $60 or Amount = $310 - $60

Amount = $370 or $250

Represent as an inequality, we have:

250 < x < 370

Answer:

the first one

Step-by-step explanation: it is your answer because when you solve it i gt that answer i calculated it in a calculator and then showed to the teahcre and said that it was crrect please mark me as brainlist

Answer:

x intercept is (1/2, 0).

y intercept = (0, -1/3)

Step-by-step explanation:

2/3x - 1/3 = 0

2/3x = 1/3

x = 1/3 * 3/2

x = 1/2.

y =  2/3(0) - 1/3 = -1/3.

Answer:

explain further or send a picture of what you mean and then I can help you

Answer:

904

Step-by-step explanation:

8 x 113 = 904